identifying study

Utilizing Provided Study Materials and Rubrics

  • Study Guides: These are often provide by instructors to offer a big-picture overview of the material to be tested.
      - A study guide typically includes a list of topics rather than specific questions and answers.
      - Students are expected to "dive more deeply" into each item listed and study beyond the guide for additional context.
  • Rubrics: These function as grading checklists for assignments such as discussion forums, essays, and projects.
      - Full Point Strategy: Students should read the entire rubric, not just the column for maximum points. Understanding the columns for lower scores helps identify pitfalls that cause point deductions.
      - Links and Visibility: Rubrics are often found under assignment descriptions or linked via buttons labeled "view grades" or "grading criteria."
  • Specific Rubric Examples:
      - Discussion Rubric: A section might be worth up to 1010 points. A separate section might govern word counts, explaining how points are lost (rather than earned) based on how much a post falls under the required length.
      - Notebook Check Rubric: This might include specific rows for items like a "four quadrant priorities chart."
        - To earn 44 out of 44 points (4/44/4), a student must include all four quadrants, fill them with items, and label everything correctly.
        - Filling only three quadrants results in earning only 33 points.
        - Additional points are often tied to clear titles, organization, and formatting.

Creating Custom Checklists from Instructions

  • Strategy for Missing Rubrics: When a rubric or guide is not provided, students should create their own checklist by reading the assignment instructions carefully multiple times to ensure no detail is missed.
  • Refining a Checklist: A well-organized checklist should be broken down into logical parts (e.g., Scenario 1 and Scenario 2).
  • Example Analysis (Sociology Assignment):
      - Part 1: Number the responses.
      - Part 2: Describe the type of research and the specific methods used.
      - Part 3: List the challenges faced by the researcher.
      - Part 4: Explain how those challenges relate to the concept of value neutrality.
      - Part 5: Describe how the research exemplifies the use of the sociological imagination.
      - Part 6: Ensure the word count requirement is met.
  • Conceptual Gaps: Using a checklist can reveal gaps in knowledge. For instance, if a student cannot complete the "value neutrality" section of their checklist, they know to revisit the lesson for that specific concept before attempting the assignment.

Understanding Bloom's Taxonomy in Learning

  • Definition: Bloom's Taxonomy is a hierarchical model used by instructors to categorize levels of learning and determine the complexity of assignments.
  • The Revised Hierarchy (Bottom to Top):
      - Remember: The most basic level; involving memorization (e.g., memorizing basic anatomy terms).
      - Understand: Demonstrating the meaning of information (e.g., "describing" a concept).
      - Apply: Using information in new situations (e.g., applying lessons to specific scenarios).
      - Analyze: Drawing connections among ideas or determining methods used (e.g., analyzing research methods or how challenges relate to principles).
      - Evaluate: Justifying a stand or decision.
      - Create: The highest level; producing new or original work (e.g., developing a physical therapy plan for a specific case study or reframing a scenario).
  • Keywords: Instructors use specific verbs to signal the level of work required.
      - "Describe" indicates the Understand level.
      - "List" indicates the Remember level.
      - "Apply" indicates the Apply level.
      - "Relate challenges" or "Analyze what methods were used" indicates the Analyze level.
      - "Evaluate scenarios" indicates the Evaluate level.

Strategic Syllabus Use and Clarification

  • Syllabus Review: Students should read the syllabus at the start of the course and revisit it frequently.
  • Identifying Goals: Look for sections labeled "objectives," "outcomes," or "goals" to understand the core learning targets of the class.
  • Clarification: If instructions are unclear, students should ask the instructor directly. Specific questions to ask include:
      - Is the exam comprehensive (covering all material since the start of the course)?
      - Does the exam only cover specific, recent lessons?

Advanced Note-Taking and Self-Testing Techniques

  • Textbook Outlining: When reading assigned chapters, create an outline based on headings, bolded words, and keyword lists.
  • Processing Lecture Notes: Do not just read notes; rewrite them to help process and internalize the information.
  • The Flashcard "Struggle Pile": When using flashcards, separate the cards you struggle to recall correctly. Return to the original lessons specifically for those items.
  • The Self-Test Method: Create a practice exam based on the material. Wait at least one (11) day before taking the test to ensure the information is in long-term memory. Any incorrect answers indicate areas for further study.
  • "Talking it Out" / The Feynman Technique: Discuss study topics with peers or attempt to teach the material to someone else. Inability to explain a concept clearly highlights a specific area that needs to be revisited in the lessons.