6c
Learning Objectives
Characterization of Voter ID laws timeline and nature in the U.S. in 2012.
Critical evaluation of implementation costs of state Voter ID laws.
Positions of Presidential candidates in 2012 and 2016 elections regarding Voter ID laws.
Texas governor's stance on voter fraud incidence in Texas and issues related to available evidence.
Different types of voter fraud and which can be addressed by Voter ID laws.
Reasons behind the lack of factual basis in claims of voter fraud.
Tension between elections security through Voter ID laws and voter participation.
Events and current state of the Voter ID requirement in Texas post-federal court challenges.
Definition and functionality of voter registration drives.
Main components of the Texas voter registration drive requirements enacted in 2011, illustrated by UTD student Julia Shomenta.
Historical perception of Texas voter registration laws as harsh by advocacy groups.
Weaknesses in the arguments for easier voter access as well as for increased election security.
Common problems in arguments for or against Voter ID laws.
Voter ID Laws as of 2012
Voter ID laws gained traction in states post-2011; previously, only Georgia and Indiana mandated photo IDs.
A surge in states considering or enacting stricter voter ID laws in the lead-up to the 2012 elections, some requiring U.S. Justice Department approval.
Types of Voter ID Laws:
Strict Photo ID Requirement:
Photo ID necessary on Election Day or within a few days for votes to count.
Certain states, like Washington, allow voting without a photo ID if certain criteria are met (i.e., signed affidavits).
Non-photo ID Requirement:
Some form of ID required, but photo ID is not mandatory (e.g., North Dakota).
Vetoed Laws:
Some governors vetoed strict photo ID laws in 2011.
States Without Voter ID Laws:
States like Vermont and Maine do not require voter IDs.
The Financial Costs of Photo ID Laws
Estimated total cost for implementing photo ID laws across 35 states: up to $828 million over four years.
Breakdown of costs per state (examples):
California: $113.6 million.
Texas: $78.2 million.
New York: $66.3 million.
Concerns raised about these costs contributing to the disenfranchisement of voters, especially during fiscal crises.
Positions of Presidential Candidates
2016 Election: Debate over the necessity of photo identification for voting.
Pro-Photo ID:
Mitt Romney (R): Advocated voter ID for preventing multiple voting, emphasized that IDs could be obtained free during voter registration.
Con-Photo ID:
Barack Obama (D): Opposed voter ID requirements, highlighting historical challenges faced by minorities and lack of significant fraud evidence.
Other Candidates: Candidates' positions varying; specifics were not detailed.
Incidence of Voter Fraud in Texas
Texas Governor Greg Abbott claimed rampant voter fraud, but investigations revealed limited evidence (e.g., 5 fraudulent votes among 1 million cast).
Types of Voter Fraud Targeted by Voter ID Laws
In-person voter impersonation is the main type aimed at by Voter ID laws.
Other types of voter fraud, such as mail-in ballot voter impersonation, remain inadequately addressed.
The Perception of Voter Fraud
Many claims of voter fraud stem from inflated voter rolls, but such inflation does not equate to fraud.
Voting irregularities encompass a range of issues; not all are solvable with photo IDs.
Key distinctions: Voter fraud involves individual actions, while election fraud involves officials.
Implications of Voter ID Laws
Voter ID laws raise concerns over undermining free and fair access to voting under the guise of preventing non-existent fraud.
Claims of massive voter fraud in recent elections often deemed baseless by research and studies.
Voter Registration Drives
Defined as coordinated efforts to facilitate voter registration for unregistered individuals; may involve paid solicitors.
State-specific regulations govern the conduct of voter registration drives, with many efforts facing legislative restrictions in recent years.
Changes in Texas Related to Voter Registration Drives
Recent Texas laws have increased challenges for voter registration groups, potentially violating First Amendment rights.
New restrictions include requiring state residency for workers, mandatory training, and in-person delivery of registration forms.
The Debate on Voting Access vs. Security
Discussion centered on whether security and access to voting can coexist; potential policies and attitudes required for acknowledging both sides' concerns.
Identified weaknesses in arguments from both perspectives, including use of exaggeration, incomplete information, and lack of respect in discourse.
Future Topics in this Lecture Series
Transition to practical problems or exercises designed to deepen understanding of these topics.