Improving Sustainability of Beef Production at the Harper Adams University Future Farm Case Study
Harper Adams University Future Farm Overview
The facility is a estate comprising cows, Lleyn ewes, and sows.
It houses the Centre for Crop and Environmental Sciences (CCES) and carries out research, teaching, and knowledge exchange.
The farm aims to achieve net-zero greenhouse gas emissions by .
Beef Production System Specifications
Intensive system: Uses British Blue cross dairy steers and heifers entering at liveweight and finishing at .
Intensive steers and heifers finish at and months of age, respectively.
Outdoor system: Uses Aberdeen-Angus cross dairy steers and heifers entering at liveweight and finishing at .
Feed and Sustainability Economics
Feed accounts for up to of variable costs in beef production systems and is a primary vehicle for greenhouse gas (GHG) mitigation.
Sustainability challenges include farm prosperity (profitability), climate change adaptation, soil health, biodiversity loss, and water quality regarding nitrogen and phosphorus.
Cost modelling express results relative to a steer growing at according to AFRC (1993) and IPCC (2006).
Comparison of Dietary Strategies and Protein Formulation
Concentrate vs. Total Mixed Ration (TMR):
Concentrate Diet: Cost is with a Margin Over Feed (MOF) of .
TMR (Maize and Grass Silage): Cost is with a MOF of .
Forage Quality:
High quality grass silage () yielded a MOF of .
Moderate quality grass silage () yielded a MOF of .
Protein Strategies:
Crude Protein (CP) focus (): MOF of .
Metabolisable Protein (MP) focus (): MOF of .
Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Performance Conclusions
The current predicted farmgate GHG intensity is .
This compares favorably to Welsh lowland beef/sheep producer ranges of .
Strategic nutrition can concurrently reduce production costs and environmental impact, though strategies must be considered on a case-by-case basis.