Separation of Powers
Separation of Powers
Overview of Separation of Powers
Separation of Powers is a core constitutional principle alongside Federalism and Civil Liberties.
It delineates the powers of the three branches of government: Executive, Legislative, and Judicial.
Key Concepts Discussed
Judicial Review: Established in Marbury v. Madison.
Legislative Powers: Defined through McCulloch v. Maryland and the Necessary and Proper Clause.
Executive Powers: Examined through cases like In re Neagle.
Ambiguities in Power
Discussion on the clarity of powers among branches and the “Political Question” doctrine.
Investigates if powers can be shared or uniquely created within branches.
Domestic Power Issues
Congressional Usurpation
Sometimes Congress enacts legislation that infringes on the powers of other branches.
INS v. Chadha (1983): Congress overstepping by giving itself veto power over executive decisions.
Zivotofsky v. Kerry (2015): Supreme Court ruling that only the President can recognize foreign powers.
Usurpation of Judicial Power
Employment Division v. Smith (1990) led to the RFRA, complicating judicial power with religious practice scrutiny.
City of Boerne v. Flores (1997) reaffirmed that it is up to the Court, not Congress, to determine constitutional rights under the 14th Amendment.
Congressional Delegation
The Constitution on Delegation
The Constitution does not explicitly prohibit delegation by Congress.
Delegation is often necessary due to time constraints and expertise.
Judicial Endorsement of Delegation
Mistretta v. U.S (1989): The Court upheld Congress’s delegation of power to set federal sentencing guidelines.
Whitman v. American Trucking Assoc. (2001): Upheld delegation of national air quality standards to EPA.
Presidential Power During War
Quick Action in Emergencies
Presidents often act unilaterally in war; courts later assess constitutional validity.
Historical examples include The Prize Cases (1863) validating presidential actions without prior Congressional declaration.
War Powers Resolution (1973)
Attempts to regulate presidential war powers through mandatory Congressional consultation and troop withdrawal timelines.
Debates ongoing about compliance and effectiveness.
Key Court Cases Regarding War Powers
Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer (1952): President’s seizure of steel industry deemed unconstitutional due to lack of statutory authority.
Ex Parte Milligan (1866): Military tribunals cannot try civilians when courts are functioning.
Hamdan v. Rumsfeld (2006): Military commissions established without legal basis; highlighted issues with evidentiary standards and Geneva Convention violations.
Hamdi v. Rumsfeld (2004): Citizens as enemy combatants upheld, but guaranteed rights to legal counsel and access to courts.