PET Scanner Instrumentation Study Notes

PET Scanner Instrumentation

Objectives

  • Diagram a PET Scanner

  • Discuss the major components of a PET scanner and their function

  • Describe how PET scanners acquire and store data

  • Explain the fundamental operation of dedicated PET scanners and their design

  • Describe transmission imaging and its need and use in attenuation-correcting PET imaging

Essential PET

  • Detection of annihilation photons from a positron emitting radionuclide

    • When a radionuclide atom decays, it emits a positron.

    • The positron travels a short distance, losing kinetic energy through ionization and excitation interactions.

    • After losing energy, it annihilates with an electron, producing two annihilation photons emitted at a 180° angle, each with 511 keV of energy.

    • If both photons are detected by two detectors arranged at 180° within a short coincidence timing window (CTW), the event is considered a “good” event, generating a count in the line connecting the detectors.

    • In reality, the positron travels only a few millimeters or less before annihilating.

Physics of Positron Emitters and Annihilation Photons

  • Positron-emitting radionuclides include:

    • C-11

    • O-15

    • N-13

    • F-18 (all are biological materials)

    • Cyclotron production yields short half-lives, limiting availability.

    • Cu-64 is also produced in cyclotrons.

    • Rb-82 is generator-produced and used for myocardial perfusion imaging.

    • Ga-68 is also generator-produced.

  • Annihilation photons

    • Emit at 511 keV and travel in opposite directions (180° apart).

    • The location of annihilation may not precisely correspond to the location of positron emission due to scattering effects.

  • Coincidence imaging

    • Detects the two photons using two detectors within a short CTW.

    • Eliminates the need for collimators through electronic collimation.

Coincidence Imaging Process

  • Light is generated (scintillation photon) during the interaction between gamma photons and a crystal.

  • This light is subsequently converted into an electronic pulse by a photo-multiplier tube (PMT) or silicon photomultiplier (SiPM).

    • SiPM represents a digital approach in PET imaging.

  • The electronic pulse then reaches the electronic circuits for processing, employing a coincidence timing window to discern between true, random, and scattered events.

    • True counts are logged in a sinogram based on the line of response (LOR) of the event detected.

Scintillation Crystals for Annihilation Photon Detection

  • Types of scintillation crystals:

    • NaI(Tl)

    • Low detection efficiency for 511-keV photons

    • Now largely replaced

    • BGO (bismuth germanate)

    • Highest detection efficiency but long decay time and low scintillation light yield.

    • Newer scintillators:

    • LSO (lutetium oxyorthosilicate), GSO (gadolinium oxysilicate), LYSO (lutetium yttrium orthosilicate)

    • Offer good detection efficiency, high light yield, and short decay times

### Summary of Scintillation Properties

Material

Cost

Detection Efficiency

Light Decay Time

Comments

NaI(Tl)

Cheap

Lowest

Long

No longer widely used

BGO

Expensive

Highest

Long

Used in TOF PET

LSO / LYSO

Expensive

High

Very short

Some patent disputes

GSO

Very expensive

Somewhat lower than LSO

Very short

No longer used

  • The decay time affects scanner deadtime, random coincidence rates, and TOF PET imaging capability.

Time-of-Flight PET (TOF-PET)

  • Utilizes scintillators with fast decay times to localize the annihilation reaction along the LOR from the two detecting crystals.

  • Timing difference of photon arrival allows precise determination along the LOR.

Basic System Design

  • Utilizes multiple small detectors (0.5 x 0.5 x 30 mm), arranged in rings within a gantry.

  • Each event is detected by two opposite detectors, defining its location along the LOR.

  • Data storage occurs in a sinogram, where each pixel represents an individual LOR.

Types of Events in PET

  • True Event: Two annihilation photons from a single annihilation detected within the CTW.

  • Single Event: Only one photon detected.

  • Random Event: Singles detected in two detectors from separate annihilations.

  • Scatter Event: True coincidence where one photon is scattered prior to detection.

  • Impact of Activity Concentration on Counts: Increased concentration alters count rates of trues, randoms, and singles.

Correction for Attenuation

  • Attenuation is critical in PET due to the dependency on both annihilation photons being detected.

  • Correction: The location of the radiopharmaceutical does not affect attenuation, enabling exact measurements through external photon sources or CT.

  • Correction Diagram:

    • Visualizes relation between event LOR and external rod source photons before correction.

Time-of-Flight PET Equations

  • The TOF-PET technique standardizes the reconstruction focus using the LOR as a potential location for the annihilation event:

    egin{align} ext{Let } riangle x & = ext{location from the center of LOR,} \ riangle t & = ext{difference in arrival times,} \ c & = ext{speed of light.} \ riangle x = c imes riangle t ext{This relates the annihilation event's depth to the LOR.} \end{align}

Quantitative Abilities

  • PET’s qualitative results measure physiologic quantities in vivo, crucial for clinical applications like drug development.

  • Successful quantitative measurements necessitate the adjustment for attenuation, scattering, and the calibration factor correlating count density to activity concentration.

Overview of PET Tomograph Composition

  • Scintillation crystals: Generally rectangular prisms sized 4-6 mm square x 20-30 mm long, oriented radially.

  • Rings of detectors formed in 18-32 configurations housed in a gantry with a bore dimension of 50-60 cm.

  • Field of View (FOV):

    • Axial FOV (gantry bore) is 15-18 cm;

    • Transaxial FOV determined by coincident detectors.

Event Detection

  • A combination of detectors forms blocks to capture annihilation photons detected in coincidence.

  • Coincidences in a CTW of 5-12 nsec long need to be registered between detector blocks.

Overview of Acquisition and Image Display

  • Multiple acquisitions performed at each bed position to cover the entire area of interest; images can be reconstructed from all recorded data.

Common acquisition approaches include:

  • Histogram mode (similar to single-photon imaging frame mode)

  • List mode acquisition

  • Prompt sinogram: Captures events detected in the CTW, providing data for trues, randoms, and scatters.

  • Delay sinogram: Offers insight on random coincidences providing comparative data analysis.

  • Transmission sinogram: Assists in better correction processes (in non-CT PET tomographs).

Performance Measures in PET

  • Spatial resolution dependent on several factors:

    • Radionuclide choice;

    • Scintillator size;

    • Detector location in the gantry;

  • Sensitivity is affected by scintillator type, detector geometry, acquisition modes, correction accuracies, 3D acquisition modes resulting in greater sensitivity.

  • Scatter fraction reflects the ratio of scattered coincidences against total counts post-random event subtraction.

  • Count rate denoted with NECR (noise-equivalent count rate) accounts for random and scatter events in PET acquisition and adjusts operation at peak NECR levels.

Standardized Uptake Value (SUV)

  • SUV provides semi-quantitative measures indicating tissue uptake.

  • SUV Formula:
    <br>SUV=racextMBqinareaofinterest(ml)extinjecteddose(MBq)imesextbodyweight(g)<br><br>SUV = rac{{ ext{MBq in area of interest (ml)}}}{{ ext{injected dose (MBq)}} imes ext{body weight (g)}}<br>

  • SUV value interpretations and variabilities heavily influenced by factors like blood sugar at injection, time lapse to imaging, and concurrent uptake by other tissues (e.g., myocardium).

Summary

  • The interplay of diverse factors determines PET imaging appearances, including tomographic design and choice of radiopharmaceuticals used.

  • SUVs are emerging as essential markers in research, emphasizing the necessity of standardization across institutions.