Testing and Evaluation of Pronunciation

CHAPTER IZ: Testing and Evaluation

Introduction

  • Topic Overview: It is noted that little focus is given to testing and evaluation in the literature on teaching pronunciation, particularly in comparison to reading, listening, and speaking skills.

  • Rationale: This is partly due to the extensive body of literature on language assessment applying equally to pronunciation but also because of unique characteristics that influence evaluation and feedback.

  • Unique Characteristics of Pronunciation:   - Involves rule application (e.g., pronunciation of -s endings) and features of perception and production.   - Important for teachers to understand distinct diagnostic and feedback processes.

  • Aim of the Chapter: To explore diagnostic evaluation procedures, ongoing feedback, evaluation strategies, and classroom testing concerning pronunciation.

Diagnostic Evaluation of Pronunciation

  • Purpose: Diagnostic evaluation assesses learners’ proficiency, typically for screening (to determine task capabilities) or placement (to assign appropriate class levels).

  • Benefits: It assists in establishing curricular objectives and identifying individual needs, enabling tailored instruction.

  • Process: Includes both global assessments of class and individual learners’ perception and production abilities.

Diagnosing Perception

  • Importance: Diagnosing a learner’s ability to distinguish sounds is crucial for developing intelligible speech.

  • Test Formats:   - Consonant-Vowel Discrimination:     - Method: Use minimal-pair discrimination exercises.     - Example: "Don't (slip / sleep) on the floor"; students mark the words they hear.   - Word Stress Recognition:     - Testing Recognition: Learners identify the stressed syllables in words/phrases.     - Example: Directions involve marking the syllable receiving the main stress in sentences.   - Prominence Recognition:     - Method: Learners mark the most prominent elements in sentences based on stress.   - Intonation Tests:     - Types: Learners identify rising vs. falling intonation patterns.     - Example: Checking intonation patterns for assertions or questions.   - Shade of Meaning Assessments:     - Learners interpret the meaning behind different stress and intonation patterns.   - Reduced Speech:     - Format: Cloze passage formats requiring missing words from reduction examples.

Diagnosing Production in the Classroom

  • Initial Samples:   - Standardized Reading Sample: Learners read from a diagnostic passage to assess pronunciation features.   - Free Speech Sample: Spoken responses on familiar topics to exhibit typical speech patterns.

  • Diagnostic Passage Aspects:   - Includes various pronunciation features (segmental/suprasegmental) for accurate assessment.   - Practice is encouraged before recording!   - Purpose of Sampling: Find natural speech and confirm the need for focused instruction, often done in a language lab.

Formal Oral Proficiency Testing Instruments

  • General Overview: Many existing tests evaluate overall oral proficiency but do not separate components like pronunciation.

  • Key Examples:   - Test of Spoken English (TSE): Administered in settings similar to TOEFL, includes assessment of several skills with a particular focus on pronunciation.   - ILR Oral Proficiency Interview: Evaluates pronunciation and fluency with trained raters providing holistic scores.   - Additional Tests: Include SPEAK Test, diagnostic passages, and self-evaluation techniques like transcribing and peer feedback.

Ongoing Evaluation with Feedback

  • Purpose: To monitor learners’ progress and provide individualized instruction or curriculum revision.

  • Self-Monitoring and Correction:   - Learners must identify and correct their pronunciation errors.   - Underscored Importance: Self-directed learning reinforces student accountability and autonomy.   - Principles include: defining learning objectives, selecting methodologies, and assessing progress themselves.

Peer Feedback and Teacher Feedback

  • Peer Interaction: Valuable for fostering an environment where learners assist each other and practice listening skills.

  • Teacher’s Role:   - Providing unobtrusive correction without disrupting speech fluency.   - Recommended to keep records to allow for constructive feedback post-activity.

  • Recording Feedback: Using cassettes can enhance the listening and correction processes.

Classroom Testing

  • Differences: Classroom tests are narrower in scope than diagnostic tests and are used throughout the course to assess learned material.

  • Assessment Types:   - Designed to evaluate what has been specifically taught, aiding in measuring progress within the course.

Tests of Perception and Production

  • Prototype Tests: Designed to evaluate sound discrimination and other competencies.

  • Test Designs: Incorporate various assessment types, such as discrimination tasks for consonants and vowels, stress patterns, intonation contours, etc.

Tests of Phonetic Knowledge

  • Additional Assessments: Appropriate for practical phonetics courses, testing students on applying learned rules through application tasks and understanding.

Conclusion

  • Final Thoughts: Ongoing evaluation plays a crucial role in effective pronunciation teaching, necessitating systematic feedback for learners’ self-correction.

  • Key Goals: Creating autonomous learners who can repair mispronunciations and monitor their own speech patterns effectively.

Exercises and Reflection

  • Key Terms to Define: Diagnostic evaluation, screening, placement, diagnostic passages, etc.

  • Discussion Questions: Consider varying approaches to testing across different learner contexts.

  • Activities: Engaging in direct responses to evaluations and peer performance observations to derive beneficial feedback promptly.