Valerie Hudson – Two Trees Theology & Feminist Equality in LDS Doctrine
Context of the Presentation
- Venue & timing: FAIR conference; talk allotted (50) minutes, ending at “quarter-till.”
- Speaker: Valerie M. Hudson—named by Foreign Policy Magazine as one of the top (100) global thinkers.
- Previous FAIR appearance: co-presented with Ralph Hancock & Richard Sherlock on SQUARE II.
- SQUARE II journal overview
- Goal: premier on-line LDS forum addressing contemporary world issues.
- All submissions peer-reviewed.
- Audience engagement: controversial topics have reached up to (50000) views.
- Spring issue highlight: first faith-affirming female-authored article on polygamy.
Key Takeaways from the Polygamy Article
- D&C 132 frames polygamy as an Abrahamic sacrifice, not an eternal norm.
- True Abrahamic sacrifices are:
- Temporally bounded.
- Eventually receive a “ram in the thicket” (deliverance) either in this life or the next.
- Practical implication: the Church does not baptize currently practicing polygamists, even where civilly legal, because outside a direct command such practice is an abomination.
- Monogamy, conversely, is never described as an abomination—rather, it is consistently portrayed as a divine blessing.
Personal Stance: “I Stay Because I Am a Feminist”
- Hudson’s conversion not based on feminism, but her continued activity is.
- LDS doctrine offers a uniquely revolutionary, woman-affirming theology.
Revolutionary LDS Doctrines from a Feminist Lens
- Definition of “God”: an exalted woman and man sealed in the New & Everlasting Covenant (see D&C 132).
- Heavenly Father is not an “old bachelor;” Satan holds that status.
- Eternal embodiment:
- Gendered bodies retained forever; they are gifts, not curses.
- Female physiology (breasts, womb, ovaries) celebrated as blessings.
- Eternal marriage & increase: Marriage persists eternally, bringing fullness of joy through unending posterity.
- Gender equality principles:
- “Equal” ≠ “identical.”
- Wide-ranging spheres of equality: blessings, power, intelligence, dignity, consent, agency, value, potential, virtue, spiritual gifts, temporal stewardships in Zion, etc.
- Elder L. Tom Perry (Feb 2004): spouses are co-presidents, not president/vice-president.
Re-reading Eden Through Restoration Lenses
- Three LDS distinctives:
- The Fall was foreordained and ultimately a blessing.
- Eve did not sin in partaking.
- Consequently, Eve was rewarded, not punished.
- Cosmology setup:
- Pre-mortal realm divided from evil by a chasm; literal Heavenly Parents rear their spirit children.
- Adolescence of spirits prompts a training-through-mortality “Plan of Separation.”
- Opposition of plans: Christ’s full-agency plan vs. Satan’s coercive alternative; $\frac{1}{3}$ rebel ((<br/>31)) while (32) accept Christ’s.
“Two Trees + Two Persons” Model
- Tree 1 – Knowledge of Good & Evil (red fruit): gateway into mortality, full agency, and the Light of Christ.
- Tree 2 – Tree of Life (white fruit): ordinances of salvation & exaltation leading home.
- Two stewardships:
- Women: guardians & givers of the first tree’s fruit (birth, agency awakening).
- Men: guardians & givers of the second tree’s fruit (priesthood ordinances).
Why Was Eve Created Second?
- Not inferiority but pedagogical symbolism: demonstrates Adam’s helplessness regarding Tree 1.
- “Help meet” (Gen. 2:18) in Hebrew denotes “equal power to save.”
- Elder Earl C. Tingey: spouses walk side by side, none before/behind.
Eve’s Act Re-evaluated
- Elder Dallin H. Oaks: Eve displayed “wisdom and courage.” Her act was the minimal transgression necessary to enact separation and agency.
- Pre-mortal reaction: we pleaded, “Mother Eve, please eat!” and rejoiced when she did.
- Suffering foreseen: rape, forced marriage, trafficking, etc. —Eve still stepped forward; she was the best, not the worst, among women.
- Reciprocal honor: the resurrected Christ first appeared to a woman (Mary) as repayment.
Consequences Misunderstood
- “Cursed is the ground for thy sake” → not punitive but enabling opposition (virtue/vice, pleasure/pain).
- Child-bearing “sorrow” ≠ malediction; motherhood is soul-satisfying.
- Genesis 3:16 “rule over” mistranslated: Elder Bruce Hafen—Hebrew bet ⇒ “rule with.”
- Therefore: God promised co-rule, not hierarchy.
The Patriarchal Order ≠ Secular Patriarchy
- Secular patriarchy: men ruling over women.
- LDS “Patriarchal Order”:
- President Ezra Taft Benson: term refers to priesthood lineage “from father to son,” and is actually “an order of family government” wherein husband & wife covenants mirror Adam & Eve.
- President James E. Faust: every father is a patriarch and every mother a matriarch, functioning as co-equals.
Restoration of the Priesthood: A Gift to Women & Families
- Restored priesthood rights re-establish proper male treatment of women:
- Single standard of chastity, marital fidelity.
- Commitment to marriage, active fatherhood, valuing daughters/sons equally.
- Rejection of abuse, pornography, and neglect.
- Willing burden-sharing (housework, etc.).
- Priesthood ≠ bonus denied to women; it is men’s apprenticeship toward Heavenly Father.
- Women possess parallel body-based & spiritual ordinances (pregnancy, childbirth, lactation)—gifts of Tree 1.
Central Drama of Civilization
- True societal health determined by man-woman, parent-child relationships—not wars, markets, or oil prices.
- Jacob 2: despite temples & scriptures, the Nephites risk destruction; the Lamanites survive because husbands/wives & parents/children love one another.
- Thus, women’s status is a barometer of a civilization’s vitality.
- Gender equality is the bedrock of Zion—the “bricks,” not decorative garnish.
Temple Symbolism & Dual Hearkening
- Eden pattern mirrored in temple covenants:
- Phase 1 (Tree 1): Adam hearkened to Eve.
- Phase 2 (Tree 2): Eve subsequently hearkens to Adam concerning ordinances.
- Possible analogous pre-mortal covenant: sons would hearken to daughters as daughters shepherded spirits into mortality.
Proper Church–Family Relationship
- Church supports—does not dominate—families.
- Elder Jeffrey R. Holland: whatever heavenly organization exists, families are central and eternal.
Bedtime Allegory (Hudson’s Children’s Story)
- Two colored fruits: red (life, agency) & white (righteous path home).
- Son placed first; daughter arrives to open Red Door; an adversary attempts deception.
- Daughter chooses courageously; brings son; collective heavenly rejoicing.
- Parents instruct: son will later open White Door, offer fruit back to daughter; mutual hearkening establishes equal partnership.
- Narrative underscores continuous giving/receiving of both stewardships throughout mortal history.
Q&A Highlights
- Two-tree model does explain priesthood stewardship division.
- Second tree = Tree of Life seen by Lehi/Nephi; protected by cherubim; accessed via ordinances.
- Tradition of Mary weaving the temple veil before Christ’s birth noted; further research encouraged.
- First-temple imagery may have included a female-deity tree; link to “Asherah” traditions (per Daniel C. Peterson).
- For full exposition see Hudson & Sorensen, Women in Eternity, Women of Zion (2007).
Practical & Ethical Implications
- LDS theology demands:
- Egalitarian marital governance.
- Rejection of misogynistic cultural patterns.
- Sacred valuation of female embodiment and maternal roles.
- Societal application: measure nations/church units by safety, dignity, and flourishing of women.