top hat chapter 1
TED TALK
texting is seen as improper use of language
writing is seen as very formal language
writing isn’t very natural or common way of communication
writing is not similar to speech
speech is very casual
texting is more similar to speech then writing
back in the day when we spoke speeches like writing, it was very unnatural
pragmatic particles: words that are part of the structure of communication
→ ex. LOL
slash can also be used in text to change the conversation
being biadialectal/bilingual can be benefical
we have criticised skill of english for years
TOP HAT 1 NOTES
language helps us communicate → build community
we have set expectations about how to use a language
linguistics is learning about how the use of languages have evolved and changed
7,168 languages exist
computer languages may be considered as languages
→ linguists are not really interested, may only be used to analyze data
languages that are not word languages are not studied by linguists
→ ex. body language
to describe the term language is hard
but all of us are experts in languages
sign language is different from body language
body language does not have grammar → pretty arbitrary
sign language has its own system and grammar
→similar to how spoken languages are
mental grammar/linguistics competence: subconscious grammar rules we follow in our head
→ linguists what to understand and learn how this system works
unacceptable sentence → not normal
even if we cannot explicitly describe rules of a language, still has internalized knowledge
being a native speaker of a language means:
you know what sounds are used in the language
know words and combinations of words
know what combinations of words are meaningful
language acquisition: learning a language without specific instructions
→ picking it up naturally
learning: learning a language with instructions and steps
children's language is a unconscious → pick up languages spoken at a early age
language learning is conscious and hard to do
language acquisition is supplemented by language instruction
→ due to language rules, spelling and writing
4 aspects of a language
discreteness: set of units that can be combined to communicate (ex. sounds, words)
grammar: systems of rules of how to
productivity: ability to use a language to create messages
displacement: to be able to talk about things not present infront of you
→ ex. past, present
crabs and cuttlefish do not speak a language
→ signals are not used in a specific way
bees use dance to describe food source
→ displacement
Pierre dogs use alarm calls to describe predators
→ displacement
ape and champ good communication → some even use sign
dolphins use whistles to describe things, can understand grammar
^ ape and dolphin above are not natural
animals do not usually display all 4 aspects of language
may turn out human language and animal communication are not that different
charles hockett made criteria that distinguishes human language from animal communication such as:
semanticity: language signals have meaning
arbitrariness: no connection between form of signal and meaning
→ except onomatopoeic words, some vary by language
discreteness: language signals made up of small units to make other words
displacement: speech about non-present things
productivity: can produce and understand new concepts that make sense in the language
animals have communication systems but do not follow hockett guidelines
grammar are set of rules in a language
grammar has many meanings such as:
study of how sentences in a languages are made
→ morphology and syntax
prescriptive grammar
generative grammar: body rules that provide an outcome of permissable sentences
set of rules accounting for constructions
knowledge and use of indicated forms for speaking/writing
linguists consider grammar as generative grammar
grammar is a mental system of rules in the head of native speakers
grammar allows native speakers to produce sounds and signs and organize them into words/sentences
→ animals do not have these grammar conditions
mental grammar can be broken into 5 components (interact with each other but looked at separately):
phonetics: perception and expression of speech
phonology: possible sound combinations
morphology: structure of words
syntax: sentence structure
semantics: meaning/interpretation of sentences
know abstract rules for a language → know how to produce and understand sentences in language
grammatical utterance: possible sentence in language
ungrammatical utterance: not possible sentence in language
a native speaker would never naturally make an ungrammatical sentence
linguist defintion of grammar is different then normal people
double negatives (two words of negation) near each other is seen as ungrammatical is also seen as proper english
speakers of a language may be able to distinguish familiarity and formality
register: style/manners of speaking
→ is about appropriateness not grammatically
the type of register used is based on situation
there are two types of registers:
informal register: casual speaking (ex. what y’all watching)
formal register: formal speaking (ex. what are you watching)
two types of approachment to grammar
descriptivist: actual use of language in situations and groups
does not favour any type of language
no correctness
describes how grammatical rules operate
focused on mental/unconscious rules to speak that language
all varieties of a language are valid and have their own logic
no scientific reason for a language to fit a certain mold
languages always change
languages adopt words from other places
descriptive rules:
the and a precede nouns
adjectives before nouns
SVO (subject, verb, object)
prescriptivist (traditional): there is a standard to speaking a language
levels of logic
classic/older forms of a language are better
warned against foreign words (words from other languages)
→ should or shouldn’t speak, incorrect or correct ways of language
prescriptive rules:
do not end sentence with a preposition
do not split infinitive (to+base)
no double negatives
prescriptive rules are not based on natural speech
linguistics is more interested in descriptive grammar
prescriptive and descriptive grammar both have rules BUT:
prescriptive mandates language (what speakers should or shouldnt do)
descriptive describes language ( what speakers do or dont do)
descriptive rules form grammatically judgements
→ opinion from a native speaker whether a sentence is well constructed or not (based on dialect)
language variety: dialect
prescriptive and descriptive rules can overlap
standard language: most popular/common version of a language
standard languages are based on what “higher” class people speak
if seen as grammatical in one language, can be seen as ungrammatical in another and vice versa
speakers know unconsciously if an utterance is acceptable or not
linguistics performance: action of speaking or performing the language
linguistics competence: mental grammar/unconscious rules of grammar
5 characteristics of grammar:
generality: each language has its own grammar
parity: all grammars are equal, none are better
mutability: grammars change within strict limits
inaccessibility: grammar knowledge is unconscious → language just works, cant describe how it does, it just does
universality: all grammars are alike in a basic principle way
TED TALK
texting is seen as improper use of language
writing is seen as very formal language
writing isn’t very natural or common way of communication
writing is not similar to speech
speech is very casual
texting is more similar to speech then writing
back in the day when we spoke speeches like writing, it was very unnatural
pragmatic particles: words that are part of the structure of communication
→ ex. LOL
slash can also be used in text to change the conversation
being biadialectal/bilingual can be benefical
we have criticised skill of english for years
TOP HAT 1 NOTES
language helps us communicate → build community
we have set expectations about how to use a language
linguistics is learning about how the use of languages have evolved and changed
7,168 languages exist
computer languages may be considered as languages
→ linguists are not really interested, may only be used to analyze data
languages that are not word languages are not studied by linguists
→ ex. body language
to describe the term language is hard
but all of us are experts in languages
sign language is different from body language
body language does not have grammar → pretty arbitrary
sign language has its own system and grammar
→similar to how spoken languages are
mental grammar/linguistics competence: subconscious grammar rules we follow in our head
→ linguists what to understand and learn how this system works
unacceptable sentence → not normal
even if we cannot explicitly describe rules of a language, still has internalized knowledge
being a native speaker of a language means:
you know what sounds are used in the language
know words and combinations of words
know what combinations of words are meaningful
language acquisition: learning a language without specific instructions
→ picking it up naturally
learning: learning a language with instructions and steps
children's language is a unconscious → pick up languages spoken at a early age
language learning is conscious and hard to do
language acquisition is supplemented by language instruction
→ due to language rules, spelling and writing
4 aspects of a language
discreteness: set of units that can be combined to communicate (ex. sounds, words)
grammar: systems of rules of how to
productivity: ability to use a language to create messages
displacement: to be able to talk about things not present infront of you
→ ex. past, present
crabs and cuttlefish do not speak a language
→ signals are not used in a specific way
bees use dance to describe food source
→ displacement
Pierre dogs use alarm calls to describe predators
→ displacement
ape and champ good communication → some even use sign
dolphins use whistles to describe things, can understand grammar
^ ape and dolphin above are not natural
animals do not usually display all 4 aspects of language
may turn out human language and animal communication are not that different
charles hockett made criteria that distinguishes human language from animal communication such as:
semanticity: language signals have meaning
arbitrariness: no connection between form of signal and meaning
→ except onomatopoeic words, some vary by language
discreteness: language signals made up of small units to make other words
displacement: speech about non-present things
productivity: can produce and understand new concepts that make sense in the language
animals have communication systems but do not follow hockett guidelines
grammar are set of rules in a language
grammar has many meanings such as:
study of how sentences in a languages are made
→ morphology and syntax
prescriptive grammar
generative grammar: body rules that provide an outcome of permissable sentences
set of rules accounting for constructions
knowledge and use of indicated forms for speaking/writing
linguists consider grammar as generative grammar
grammar is a mental system of rules in the head of native speakers
grammar allows native speakers to produce sounds and signs and organize them into words/sentences
→ animals do not have these grammar conditions
mental grammar can be broken into 5 components (interact with each other but looked at separately):
phonetics: perception and expression of speech
phonology: possible sound combinations
morphology: structure of words
syntax: sentence structure
semantics: meaning/interpretation of sentences
know abstract rules for a language → know how to produce and understand sentences in language
grammatical utterance: possible sentence in language
ungrammatical utterance: not possible sentence in language
a native speaker would never naturally make an ungrammatical sentence
linguist defintion of grammar is different then normal people
double negatives (two words of negation) near each other is seen as ungrammatical is also seen as proper english
speakers of a language may be able to distinguish familiarity and formality
register: style/manners of speaking
→ is about appropriateness not grammatically
the type of register used is based on situation
there are two types of registers:
informal register: casual speaking (ex. what y’all watching)
formal register: formal speaking (ex. what are you watching)
two types of approachment to grammar
descriptivist: actual use of language in situations and groups
does not favour any type of language
no correctness
describes how grammatical rules operate
focused on mental/unconscious rules to speak that language
all varieties of a language are valid and have their own logic
no scientific reason for a language to fit a certain mold
languages always change
languages adopt words from other places
descriptive rules:
the and a precede nouns
adjectives before nouns
SVO (subject, verb, object)
prescriptivist (traditional): there is a standard to speaking a language
levels of logic
classic/older forms of a language are better
warned against foreign words (words from other languages)
→ should or shouldn’t speak, incorrect or correct ways of language
prescriptive rules:
do not end sentence with a preposition
do not split infinitive (to+base)
no double negatives
prescriptive rules are not based on natural speech
linguistics is more interested in descriptive grammar
prescriptive and descriptive grammar both have rules BUT:
prescriptive mandates language (what speakers should or shouldnt do)
descriptive describes language ( what speakers do or dont do)
descriptive rules form grammatically judgements
→ opinion from a native speaker whether a sentence is well constructed or not (based on dialect)
language variety: dialect
prescriptive and descriptive rules can overlap
standard language: most popular/common version of a language
standard languages are based on what “higher” class people speak
if seen as grammatical in one language, can be seen as ungrammatical in another and vice versa
speakers know unconsciously if an utterance is acceptable or not
linguistics performance: action of speaking or performing the language
linguistics competence: mental grammar/unconscious rules of grammar
5 characteristics of grammar:
generality: each language has its own grammar
parity: all grammars are equal, none are better
mutability: grammars change within strict limits
inaccessibility: grammar knowledge is unconscious → language just works, cant describe how it does, it just does
universality: all grammars are alike in a basic principle way