Lecture Notes: Social Reaction and Critical Models of Crime

Learning Outcomes

  • Compare and contrast sociological theories to analyze various social problems, criminal behavior, and crime victimization.
  • Apply sociological theories to criminal cases and crime statistics.
  • Discuss the role of criminological theory in shaping the structure and operation of correctional facilities.
  • Acknowledge the limitations of theories and research methods in analyzing criminal events and behavior.
  • Improve the use of complex terminology in explaining criminological theory and criminal events.

Labelling and Social Reaction Theory

Overview
  • Labelling Theory: Examines how societal labels affect personal identity and can lead to a self-fulfilling prophecy regarding criminal behavior.
  • Tendency to label lower class individuals and minorities more negatively as offenders compared to middle or upper-class individuals.
Key Concepts
  • Hands-off Policy: Suggests that reducing stigmatization by authorities and society can lessen recidivism rates.
  • Policies from 1960s and 70s:
    • Diversion: Encouraging first-time offenders to avoid the formal justice system to prevent labeling.
    • Decriminalization: Less harsh punishments for minor offenses to avoid stigma.
    • Deinstitutionalization: Opposing the incarceration of juveniles for minor offenses to prevent labels and stigmas.
Foundational Theorists
  • George Mead: Emphasized the construction of self through social interactions and external judgments.
  • Charles Cooley: Highlighted the Looking-Glass Self, whereby self-perception is influenced by the perception of others.
Consequences of Labelling
  • Isolation: Labeling can result in social isolation as labeled individuals are often rejected by mainstream society and gravitate toward other marginalized individuals.
  • Feedback system: Associating with those who are also labeled can increase likelihood of engaging in further illegal activities.
  • Dramatization of Evil (Frank Tannenbaum): Overreaction to minor offenses by the community enhances the severity of the label and the individual's status as an offender.
Types of Deviance
  • Primary Deviance: Minor, infrequent offenses committed before being caught; typically do not lead to labeling.
  • Secondary Deviance: More serious offending that occurs after being labeled as an offender; often a result of internalizing the label.
Lemert's Causal Model
  • Relationship between labeling and subsequent behavior:
    • If an offender is not labeled, they are less likely to engage in secondary deviance.
Criticisms of Labelling Theory
  • The label does not cause initial offending; other underlying factors contribute to criminal behavior.
  • Focus on informal labelling from community and social circles is significant in understanding behavior.

Marxist Theories of Crime

Overview
  • Focus: Disproportionate rates of arrest and charging of lower-class individuals; impact of capitalist structures on justice.
  • Key Terms:
    • Bourgeoisie: Elite class owning production means, controlling societal power.
    • Proletariat: Working class exploited by the bourgeoisie, lacking true profit from labor.
Bonger’s Contribution
  • Argued that capitalism breeds a competitive and selfish society, inciting crime.
  • Isolation and Individualism: Increased focus on personal gain over community interest can lead to criminal behavior.
Quinney's Extension
  • Emphasized capitalism as the root cause of all crime, including crimes committed by upper classes.
  • Critiques: Viewed as overly simplistic in attributing crime solely to capitalist factors.

Conflict Theories of Crime

Overview
  • Assumes constant social change leads to conflict among groups vying for their interests.
Key Theorists
  • Thorstein Sellin: Studied cultural diversity; argued that separate cultures create their own norms diverging from mainstream values.
  • George Vold: Suggested that social groups inherently form based on shared interests, leading to law-making that prioritizes these groups.
  • Austin Turk: Identified competition for power among groups as a primary driver of crime; discussed the relationship between systemic conflict and criminal justice inefficiencies.
Empirical Evidence
  • Studies linking the number of interest groups in a society to crime rates.

Policy Implications

Related to Labelling Theory
  • Diversion: Avoiding official labeling by redirecting offenders to rehabilitation instead of incarceration.
  • Decriminalization: Reducing penalties for minor crimes to minimize stigmatization.
  • Deinstitutionalization: Keeping minors out of formal systems to prevent labeling impacts.
  • Economic Opportunities: Enhancing access to jobs is critical for future crime reduction.
  • Right on Crime Movement: Advocates for reforming crime prevention strategies while reducing prison populations.

In-Class Activity

  • Objective: Develop a policy proposal reflecting principles of diversion, decriminalization, or deinstitutionalization.
  • Elements of Proposal:
    • Title, target population, policy approach, policy description, justification, intended outcomes based on labelling theory concepts.

Next Week Prep

  • Read Tibbets & Hemmens (2019), Section 10.
  • Quiz on today’s lecture (Chapter 9).
  • Essay due Friday, March 21st at 11 PM.