Lecture Notes: Social Reaction and Critical Models of Crime
Learning Outcomes
- Compare and contrast sociological theories to analyze various social problems, criminal behavior, and crime victimization.
- Apply sociological theories to criminal cases and crime statistics.
- Discuss the role of criminological theory in shaping the structure and operation of correctional facilities.
- Acknowledge the limitations of theories and research methods in analyzing criminal events and behavior.
- Improve the use of complex terminology in explaining criminological theory and criminal events.
Labelling and Social Reaction Theory
Overview
- Labelling Theory: Examines how societal labels affect personal identity and can lead to a self-fulfilling prophecy regarding criminal behavior.
- Tendency to label lower class individuals and minorities more negatively as offenders compared to middle or upper-class individuals.
Key Concepts
- Hands-off Policy: Suggests that reducing stigmatization by authorities and society can lessen recidivism rates.
- Policies from 1960s and 70s:
- Diversion: Encouraging first-time offenders to avoid the formal justice system to prevent labeling.
- Decriminalization: Less harsh punishments for minor offenses to avoid stigma.
- Deinstitutionalization: Opposing the incarceration of juveniles for minor offenses to prevent labels and stigmas.
Foundational Theorists
- George Mead: Emphasized the construction of self through social interactions and external judgments.
- Charles Cooley: Highlighted the Looking-Glass Self, whereby self-perception is influenced by the perception of others.
Consequences of Labelling
- Isolation: Labeling can result in social isolation as labeled individuals are often rejected by mainstream society and gravitate toward other marginalized individuals.
- Feedback system: Associating with those who are also labeled can increase likelihood of engaging in further illegal activities.
- Dramatization of Evil (Frank Tannenbaum): Overreaction to minor offenses by the community enhances the severity of the label and the individual's status as an offender.
Types of Deviance
- Primary Deviance: Minor, infrequent offenses committed before being caught; typically do not lead to labeling.
- Secondary Deviance: More serious offending that occurs after being labeled as an offender; often a result of internalizing the label.
Lemert's Causal Model
- Relationship between labeling and subsequent behavior:
- If an offender is not labeled, they are less likely to engage in secondary deviance.
Criticisms of Labelling Theory
- The label does not cause initial offending; other underlying factors contribute to criminal behavior.
- Focus on informal labelling from community and social circles is significant in understanding behavior.
Marxist Theories of Crime
Overview
- Focus: Disproportionate rates of arrest and charging of lower-class individuals; impact of capitalist structures on justice.
- Key Terms:
- Bourgeoisie: Elite class owning production means, controlling societal power.
- Proletariat: Working class exploited by the bourgeoisie, lacking true profit from labor.
Bonger’s Contribution
- Argued that capitalism breeds a competitive and selfish society, inciting crime.
- Isolation and Individualism: Increased focus on personal gain over community interest can lead to criminal behavior.
Quinney's Extension
- Emphasized capitalism as the root cause of all crime, including crimes committed by upper classes.
- Critiques: Viewed as overly simplistic in attributing crime solely to capitalist factors.
Conflict Theories of Crime
Overview
- Assumes constant social change leads to conflict among groups vying for their interests.
Key Theorists
- Thorstein Sellin: Studied cultural diversity; argued that separate cultures create their own norms diverging from mainstream values.
- George Vold: Suggested that social groups inherently form based on shared interests, leading to law-making that prioritizes these groups.
- Austin Turk: Identified competition for power among groups as a primary driver of crime; discussed the relationship between systemic conflict and criminal justice inefficiencies.
Empirical Evidence
- Studies linking the number of interest groups in a society to crime rates.
Policy Implications
- Diversion: Avoiding official labeling by redirecting offenders to rehabilitation instead of incarceration.
- Decriminalization: Reducing penalties for minor crimes to minimize stigmatization.
- Deinstitutionalization: Keeping minors out of formal systems to prevent labeling impacts.
- Economic Opportunities: Enhancing access to jobs is critical for future crime reduction.
- Right on Crime Movement: Advocates for reforming crime prevention strategies while reducing prison populations.
In-Class Activity
- Objective: Develop a policy proposal reflecting principles of diversion, decriminalization, or deinstitutionalization.
- Elements of Proposal:
- Title, target population, policy approach, policy description, justification, intended outcomes based on labelling theory concepts.
Next Week Prep
- Read Tibbets & Hemmens (2019), Section 10.
- Quiz on today’s lecture (Chapter 9).
- Essay due Friday, March 21st at 11 PM.