Aggression and Bullying Notes
Aggression and Bullying
- Definition of Aggression:
- Intent to harm is a key factor.
- Subjective social labeling influences perception.
- Injurious and destructive behavior defined socially.
Types of Aggression
- Hostile vs. Instrumental aggression.
- Angry vs. Non-angry aggression.
- Distinction between aggression (behavior), hostility (attitudinal), and anger (emotional arousal).
- Assertiveness is different from aggression.
Theories of Aggression
- Trait theory: Consistency and stability of aggressive traits.
- Drive theory: Freud's hydraulic model, catharsis hypothesis.
- Ethological theory: Agonistic interactions.
- Social cognitive theory:
- Sociocognitive Influences: Modeling, enactive experience, direct tuition.
- Sociocognitive Regulators: Outcome expectations, self-efficacy beliefs.
- Information Processing Model (Crick & Dodge, 1994):
- Encode, interpret social cues; formulate goals.
- Generate strategies, evaluate effectiveness, enact response.
- General Aggression Model (GAM) (Anderson & Bushman, 2002):
- Integrative framework considering social, cognitive, personality, developmental, and biological factors.
Role of the Victim
- Anxious or crying children often become targets.
- Aggressors are gratified by pain cues.
- Low self-regard and self-perceived social competence contribute to victimization.
- Cycle: Low self-regard and abuse reinforce each other.
- Anxiety is both a cause and consequence of victimization.
- Types of Peer Victimization:
- Physical, Verbal, Relational, and Cyber victimization.
- Coping self-efficacy is a mediator between victimization and psychological outcomes.
- Physical weakness.
- Behavioral reactions: passive or provocative victim.
- Low status, minority status, few friends, poor quality friendships.
- Overprotective parents, enmeshed relationships, poor communication.
- Bullying not taken seriously, lack of support for reporting, unclear procedures.
Psychological Outcomes of Peer Victimization
- Depression, anxiety, low self-esteem , school refusal and loneliness, acting out, suicide ideation.
Factors Attenuating Negative Impact of Victimization
- Coping skills.
- Coping self-efficacy: perceived capability to control negative events.
- Two cognitive domains: Self-efficacy for avoiding self-blame, Victim-role disengagement.
- Two behavioral domains: Self-efficacy for proactive behavior, Self-efficacy for avoiding aggressive behavior.
- Coping Self-Efficacy and Cyber Victimization: Coping self-efficacy and emotion dysregulation partially or fully mediated the relationship between cyber victimization, depression, and social anxiety.
Definition of Bullying
- Bullying involves repeated negative actions over time and an imbalance of power.
- Participant roles: bully, reinforcer, assistant, victim, defender, outsider.
Electronic/Cyber Bullying
- Bullying through digital means.
- Debates over definition remain.
- Prevalence: Lower than traditional bullying; recent data show significant negative online experiences.
Debates about the Causes of Bullying
- Skilled manipulation vs. Cognitive deficits.
- Moral disengagement: Selective activation and disengagement of internal controls, enabling harmful conduct despite moral standards.
- Mechanisms of moral disengagement: moral justification, euphemistic language, advantageous comparison, displacement/diffusion of responsibility, distorting consequences, dehumanization, attribution of blame.
The Role of Bystanders
- Active vs. Passive bystanders.
- Active bystanders: help the victim or the bully(defenders).
- Intervention by bystanders can reduce bullying.
- Bystanders & Moral Disengagement: MD neg. associated with defending styles & pos. associated with aggressive defending.
- Cyberbullying defending depends on self-efficacy & moral disengagement.