Criminal Procedure: Miranda Principles
Introduction to Miranda Warnings
Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination allows a person in police custody to remain silent.
Many arrestees are unaware of their right to remain silent, right to counsel, or other constitutional rights.
Miranda warnings are required when a person is in custody and police desire and anticipate interrogation.
Miranda Warning Components
Right to remain silent.
Anything said can and will be used against you in court.
Right to an attorney during questioning.
If indigent, a free attorney will be appointed.
Ability to exercise these rights at any time.
Basis for Warnings
Fifth Amendment: No person compelled to be a witness against themselves.
Historical police interrogation practices included brutality, isolation, and psychological tactics, leading to involuntary confessions.
Key Case Precedents
Escobedo v. Illinois (1964): Reversed conviction due to denial of counsel during interrogation, violating Fifth and Sixth Amendments.
Miranda v. Arizona (1966): Established the requirement for police to inform arrestees of their constitutional rights (silence, counsel, etc.) before custodial interrogation.
Missouri v. Seibert (2004): Ruled against