genetic impacts and fisheries
fisheries induced evolution
fisheries-induced evolution (FIE) = genetic changes in fish populations caused by selective harvesting
fishing targets big fish
natural predators often target small or weak fish
this:
fishing = opposite selection pressure compared to nature
large, fast growing, late maturing fish are removed
small, slow growing, early-maturing fish survive and reproduce
different life history traits are affected by due to FIE
fishing selects for earlier maturation, smaller size at age, slower growth, lower reproductive investment
this is because large, old, fecud fish are removed, and only small early maturing fish contribute to the gene pool. so overtime there is an evolutionary shift
FIE is a problem because:
smaller adults = low fecundity
early maturation = less energy for growth
reduced body size = lower resilience
long term reduction in stock productivity
slow to reverse, because evolution is heritable
FIE can reduce maximum sustainable yield (MSY) and recovery potential
genetic structure and local adaptation
fish populations are not single homogenous genetic pools
they are made f local, genetically distinct subpopulations, adapted to temperature, salinity, migration routes, spawning grounds, timing, and depth
NE atlantic cod has multpile genetically distinct populations
coastal vs migratory cod
spawning groups separate
different adaptive genes
Herring
shows AIC-like clines, different spawning times, genetically strucutred populations
salmon
locally adapted to rivers → extremenly strong genetic structure
overfishing removes some local groups entirely leading to loss of genetic diversity, loss of locally adapted traits, and reduced resilience to climate change
this is called genetic erosion
how fisheries impact genetic diversity
there are three pathways that impact genetic diversity
direct selection
demographic effects
habitat changes
direct selection:
this is basically teh selective removal of large/old fish = evolutionary change
demographic effect:
overfishing reduces population size, number of breeders and effective population size (Ne)
a low Ne → random genetic drift, loss of rare alleles, inbreeding, reduced adaptability
habitat changes
fishing modifies the seabed, migration pathways, spawning grounds
this shifts which subpopulation survives, altering the genetic structure
genomic tools reveal hidden impacts
there are new genomic technologies
whole genome sequencing
SNP arrays
RADseq
Environmental DNA (eDNA)
these tools reveal cryptic population structure, fine sclae adaptation, selective sweeps, signatures of overfishing, and changes happening faster than we though
case study: atlantic cod
cod have supergenens (inversions) associated with migration behaviour
overfishing + climate → geographical shifts in supergene frequencies
strong spatial genetic structure despite high dispersal potential
gene flow is not enough to rescue overfishes stocks
even if some fish move long distances, strong local adaptation means that mixing does not guarantee recovery
this is why some stocks fail to rebuild
fisheries induced evolution is slow to reverse
once traits (like small size) become genetically embedded
reversal takes many generations
natural selection must work in opposite direction
but fishing pressure often continues
so we get evolutionary ratchets
management implications
protect old/large fish → maintain genetic diversity
protect local spawning units
use genomic monitoring
avoid high exploitation rates
incorporate evolutionary considerations into stock assessments
the papers - Bernatchez et al. 2017 and Helmerson et al. 2025
fisheries have profound genetic impacts on marine fish populations through both selective harvesting and long term demographic reductinos. Bernatchez et al. (2017) outlines the mechanisms of fosheries induced evolution (FIE), where size selective harvesting removes large, late maturing individuals and favours genotypes, local adaptation, and earlier maturation. Genomic toold reveal fine scale population strucutre, local adaptation, and evolutionary shofts that would otherwise remain hidden. Helmerson et al. (2025) provide empirical evidence of these processes by analysing a century of archival and modern atlantic cod genomes. They show major allele frequency shifts, reduced genetic diversity, and changes in key supergenes controlling migration, behaviour, and temperature tolerance.Many cod subpopulations have been genetically homogenised or lost entirely, indicating that human pressures have reshaped cod genomes far more rapidly than natural processes could. Both papers highlight that genetic erosion reduces adaptive potential and makes population recovery under climate change more difficult. Effective management therefore requires protecting large spawners, conserving local populations, maintaining effective population size, and using genomic to monitor evolutionary change