Influences on Policy
Understanding different influences on policy-making processes.
Part 1: Introduction to policy process theory, referencing Birkland text.
Part 2: Application of theory through review of significant domestic policy fields; reference Cochrane text and CQ Researcher articles.
Process Model - James Anderson
Identification of a Problem: Recognizing issues that require governmental action.
Setting Decision-Making Agendas: Establishing priorities for discussion.
Formulating Policy Proposals: Drafting potential solutions for the identified problem.
Legitimizing Policy (Formalization): Gaining official approval for the proposals.
Implementation of Policy: Enacting the policy and putting it into action.
Evaluating Policy: Assessing the effectiveness and outcomes of the policy.
Refining Policy: Making necessary adjustments based on evaluation results.
Role of the policy maker and the administrators in shaping policy.
Governance Defined: Combination of administration and policy.
Administration: Viewed as the implementation of policies.
Policy: Provides guidance for administrators.
Administrative Discretion:
The interpretation of law through the guidance that policy makers provide.
Policy makers guide implementation with legislative oversight.
Objectives of Governance:
Efficiency: Optimal resource use in administration.
Effectiveness: Achieving desired results.
Equity: Fair distribution of resources and services.
Conceptual Overview:
Intervention & Interaction: Examining elements like federal funding and state distribution.
Defining Public:
Questions around who constitutes the public and perceptions of this group.
Ideal vs. Reality: Investigating if the ideal conception of the public aligns with reality.
Variability in definitions across policy fields and over time, exemplified through education.
What is Policy?
Questions concerning whether policy equates to laws created by legislative bodies.
Enforcement Importance: Policies only function when enforced.
Purpose of Policy: Investigating if the meaning of policy varies among stakeholders.
Examination of external influences on policy from non-legislative entities.
Policy Definitions:
Eulau & Prewitt: A standing decision marked by consistency in behavior by both makers and adherents.
Easton: A framework for the authoritative allocation of values pertaining to society.
Dye: Broader perspective stating "Whatever government chooses to do or not to do".
Stable Process:
Links policy to action aimed at goals over time by government officials.
Responses to public demands and can lead to either action or inaction.
Driven by Liberalism:
Public policy serves public interest and is defined through elected policy makers.
Mandates in Policy-Making:
Differentiate between direct vs. indirect mandates in federalism.
Understanding power dynamics that influence policy-making decisions.
Definitions:
Power: Ability to compel actions contrary to someone's will.
Authority: Legitimized power based on societal consent.
Legitimization:
Based on public consent regarding political power.
Sovereign Authority: Derived from the will of the people without coercion.
Founders' Concerns:
Fear of both monarchy tyranny and populace tyranny.
Solution involved dispersing power to prevent concentration.
James Madison's Insight:
Highlights the need for proper checks and balances among governmental branches.
Government must be structured to counteract ambitions of individuals.
Division of Authority:
Split of power between national and state governments, each with designated responsibilities.
Checks and Balances:
Each level of government maintains oversight over others, guided by enumerated powers and diverse interests.
Responsibilities Within Government:
Each governmental body has constitutionally defined roles and responsibilities.
The federal government acts through constitutional authority: Article 1, Section 8.
Timeline of Federalism Phases:
1789-1865: Union in Peril.
1865-1937: Qualitative Federalism.
1937-present: Cooperative Federalism.
Use the layer cake analogy to describe different federalism phases.
Key Principles:
National government operates via enumerated powers.
Limited national government constitutional purposes.
Each government exercises sovereign authority in its responsibilities.
Relationship marked by tension rather than cooperation.
Key Drivers:
The Great Depression led to increased national institutions.
Growth of federal regulatory and administrative agencies.
Perception that state and local governments are insufficient to meet needs.
Modern Federalism Model:
Described as a marble cake, showcasing mixed responsibilities.
Fiscal Federalism: Examining the interplay of government responsibilities and financial management.
Types of Mandates:
Direct Mandates: Require state compliance based on constitutional authority.
Indirect Mandates: Conditioned on state consent and federal funding receipt.
Government Functions:
Federal government captures revenue to control the economy while states allocate funds and implement programs.
Financial Incentives:
Federal funding acts as leverage to encourage state participation in policy initiatives.
Continued reliance on funding shapes state constituencies benefiting from federal programs.
The Role of Government:
Perspectives from William Graham Summer (Libertarian), Edward Bellamy (Socialist), and Woodrow Wilson (Pragmatist) on government roles.
Need for Separation of Powers:
Government must have inherent self-governing mechanisms to maintain control.
Definitions:
Positive Law: Specific provisions in state constitutions.
Higher Law: Principles embodied in the Federal Constitution, subject to interpretation.
Crisis Response:
American administrative state emerged from crisis and adaptability rather than careful planning.
Analogy of the Constitution as a log cabin, with administration filling gaps as needed.
Challenges Faced:
Incoherent personnel systems, weak regulatory machinery, and poor coordination.
Impact of the Depression Era and subsequent reforms of the 1960s.
Role of Legitimization:
Interaction between official and unofficial policy actors over extended periods.
Clear definitions and terms influence the complexity of policy making.
Definition:
Refers to specific areas where various participants contest for influence and decision-making.
Types of Actors:
Official Actors: Elected public officials with constitutional authority.
Unofficial Actors: Private interests not authorized constitutionally.
Levels of Government:
Federal (US Constitution), State (State Constitution), Local (subject to state authority).
Primary Policy Mechanisms:
Includes Congress, state legislatures, county commissioners, and city councils, often supported by administrative staff.
Role and Responsibility:
The chief executive is typically the sole elected official representing a political unit, responsible for oversight of administrative functions.
Judicial System's Function:
The Supreme Court and lower courts interpret law, assure constitutional compliance, and respond to challenges.
Key Elements:
Job specialization, hierarchical control, institutional knowledge, trained staff, and standard operating procedures.
Role of Interests and Media:
Unofficial actors representing specific interests influence policy processes through their participation levels.
The Power of Group Mobilization:
Groups, rather than individuals, effectively influence policy by mobilizing and gaining visibility among policymakers.
Key Concepts:
Divided Power, Compromise, and Equilibrium emphasize characteristics needed for effective governance.
Punctuated Equilibrium:
Explains how policy fields can remain stable until disrupted by significant events, leading to new policy adoption.
Focusing Events and Social Movements:
Factors that can shift focus and decision-making in policy fields.
Key Interactions:
Long-term engagement of both official and unofficial actors within specific policy domains (e.g., education, environment).
Types of Operatives:
Entrepreneurs (promote change), Technical Specialists (subject experts), Decision Makers (elected or administratively appointed), Mediators (influence from media/public opinion).
Understanding Influence:
Influence is a collective activity, necessitating sacrifices for the greater good.
Madison's Concerns:
Need for controlling inevitable factions to prevent tyranny by promoting a diverse union.
Necessary Measures:
Controlling faction causes may involve limiting liberty or homogenizing opinions.
Group Theory Model:
Policy outcomes are determined through competition and negotiations among various groups.
Critique of Pluralism:
Suggests influential elite groups dominate policy-making processes at the expense of broader interests.
Challenges for Lower & Working Classes:
Difficulty in organizing and exerting influence due to lack of resources and ineffective representation.
Interest Group Dynamics:
Argues that groups tend to form primarily to benefit their members, hampered by issues like the free-rider problem.
Decision-Making Frameworks:
Rational, Community/Political Theory, and Strategic Decision-Making emphasize thorough consideration of alternatives and coordinated action toward predefined outcomes.
Challenges in Government:
Difficulties in knowing public desires, leading to trade-offs for individual gains.
Characteristics:
Defined by clear objectives, full consideration of alternatives, with decisions aimed at maximizing benefits.
Herbert Simon's Perspective:
Limits in human rationality necessitate refined decision making focusing on practical limits and stakeholder satisfaction.
Group Decision-Making:
Emphasizes collective, community-driven choices based on personal values and cooperation.
Characteristics:
Ambiguous objectives, changing preferences, limited evaluation of costs and benefits, prioritizing the stability of power positions.
Obstacles:
Difficulty in agreeing on measurable outcomes, complex resource control, and political conflicts complicating effective governance.
Realistic Approach:
Adjustments based on limited information and political realities, emphasizing gradual changes in policy.
Pragmatic Decision-Making:
Highlights targeted and intentional adjustments within existing policy frameworks.
Policy Development Steps:
Identifying problems, setting agendas, formulating proposals, legitimizing, implementing, evaluating, and refining policies.
Dimensions of Policy Agenda:
Ranges from vague issues to concrete decision agendas that transform into laws.
Competing Interests:
Official actors representing public interests versus unofficial actors with private aims.
Control Dynamics:
Limited resources heighten competition for agenda placement, enabling specific groups to dominate the discourse.
Reality of Problems:
Consensus is necessary for issues to be recognized by the government as problems affecting the public.
Power Dynamics:
Different forms of power manifest in agenda placement processes, influencing governance and policy outcomes.
Types Identified:
Positive, negative, and latent powers illustrate diverse influences on policy agendas.
Process Overview:
Development of mechanisms to address public issues follows agenda placement.
Competitive Nature:
Many alternative proposals exist, with rational methods often constrained by political compromise.
Proposed Solutions:
Various approaches like public funding for job creation, direct job initiatives, and tax reduction strategies to promote economic growth.
Criteria for Alternatives:
Must be technically feasible, affordable, and politically acceptable to gain traction in policy discussions.
Knowledge of Effects & Causes:
The presence or absence of information significantly influences policy formulation typologies.
Typologies Explained:
Routine (high knowledge of effects/cause), Incremental (status quo adjustment), Creative (innovative solutions), Conditional responses, and Craftsmanship (ad-hoc responses).
Three Types:
Traditional, Charismatic, and Legal/Rational authority frameworks establish legitimacy in governance.
Legitimization:
Actions grounded in constitutional law receive general public acceptance, ensuring the legitimacy of government actions.
Public Perception:
Citizens must see government authority as legitimate and comply willingly with enacted policies.
Action Legitimacy Sources:
Majoritarian actions reflect popular legislative activities, whereas non-majoritarian actions may arise from court or bureaucratic decisions.
Procedural Legitimacy:
Support from legislative review processes ensures bills are scrutinized, promoting accountability.
Drafting Laws:
Laws written broadly facilitate multiple interpretations, impacting political compromise.
Rules and Regulations:
Administrative rules possess the force of law, with established procedures enacted under the Administrative Procedures Act.
Role of Courts:
Judicial actions protect individual rights and shape policy through rulings on constitutional legitimacy.
Nature of Implementation:
Translates legislative intentions into action, ensuring alignment with legal principles.
Relationship Dynamics:
Policymakers (principals) trust administrators (agents) to implement policies effectively.
Top-Down vs. Bottom-Up:
Top-down approaches may lack local sensitivity; bottom-up approaches favor local adaptation but risk deviations.
Importance of Communication:
Effective communication between levels of government is crucial for performance and localized responsiveness.
Key Elements:
Clear measurable outcomes, performance indicators, appraisals, performance incentives, and resource allocation linked to performance.