EB

Public_Policy 1

Page 1

Page 2: Plan of Study Policy

  • Influences on Policy

    • Understanding different influences on policy-making processes.

    • Part 1: Introduction to policy process theory, referencing Birkland text.

    • Part 2: Application of theory through review of significant domestic policy fields; reference Cochrane text and CQ Researcher articles.

  • Process Model - James Anderson

    • Identification of a Problem: Recognizing issues that require governmental action.

    • Setting Decision-Making Agendas: Establishing priorities for discussion.

    • Formulating Policy Proposals: Drafting potential solutions for the identified problem.

    • Legitimizing Policy (Formalization): Gaining official approval for the proposals.

    • Implementation of Policy: Enacting the policy and putting it into action.

    • Evaluating Policy: Assessing the effectiveness and outcomes of the policy.

    • Refining Policy: Making necessary adjustments based on evaluation results.

    • Role of the policy maker and the administrators in shaping policy.

Page 3: Governance

  • Governance Defined: Combination of administration and policy.

    • Administration: Viewed as the implementation of policies.

    • Policy: Provides guidance for administrators.

  • Administrative Discretion:

    • The interpretation of law through the guidance that policy makers provide.

    • Policy makers guide implementation with legislative oversight.

  • Objectives of Governance:

    • Efficiency: Optimal resource use in administration.

    • Effectiveness: Achieving desired results.

    • Equity: Fair distribution of resources and services.

Page 4: Federalism

  • Conceptual Overview:

    • Intervention & Interaction: Examining elements like federal funding and state distribution.

  • Defining Public:

    • Questions around who constitutes the public and perceptions of this group.

    • Ideal vs. Reality: Investigating if the ideal conception of the public aligns with reality.

    • Variability in definitions across policy fields and over time, exemplified through education.

Page 5: Understanding Policy

  • What is Policy?

    • Questions concerning whether policy equates to laws created by legislative bodies.

    • Enforcement Importance: Policies only function when enforced.

    • Purpose of Policy: Investigating if the meaning of policy varies among stakeholders.

    • Examination of external influences on policy from non-legislative entities.

Page 6: Definitions of Policy

  • Policy Definitions:

    • Eulau & Prewitt: A standing decision marked by consistency in behavior by both makers and adherents.

    • Easton: A framework for the authoritative allocation of values pertaining to society.

    • Dye: Broader perspective stating "Whatever government chooses to do or not to do".

Page 7: Characteristics of Public Policy**

  • Stable Process:

    • Links policy to action aimed at goals over time by government officials.

    • Responses to public demands and can lead to either action or inaction.

Page 8: Democracy & Public Policy**

  • Driven by Liberalism:

    • Public policy serves public interest and is defined through elected policy makers.

Page 9: Structure of Federalism**

  • Mandates in Policy-Making:

    • Differentiate between direct vs. indirect mandates in federalism.

    • Understanding power dynamics that influence policy-making decisions.

Page 10: Power & Authority**

  • Definitions:

    • Power: Ability to compel actions contrary to someone's will.

    • Authority: Legitimized power based on societal consent.

  • Legitimization:

    • Based on public consent regarding political power.

    • Sovereign Authority: Derived from the will of the people without coercion.

Page 11: Power & the Constitution**

  • Founders' Concerns:

    • Fear of both monarchy tyranny and populace tyranny.

    • Solution involved dispersing power to prevent concentration.

Page 12: Federalist 51**

  • James Madison's Insight:

    • Highlights the need for proper checks and balances among governmental branches.

    • Government must be structured to counteract ambitions of individuals.

Page 13: Understanding Federalism**

  • Division of Authority:

    • Split of power between national and state governments, each with designated responsibilities.

  • Checks and Balances:

    • Each level of government maintains oversight over others, guided by enumerated powers and diverse interests.

Page 14: Constitutional Legitimization**

  • Responsibilities Within Government:

    • Each governmental body has constitutionally defined roles and responsibilities.

    • The federal government acts through constitutional authority: Article 1, Section 8.

Page 15: Historical Perspective of Federalism**

  • Timeline of Federalism Phases:

    • 1789-1865: Union in Peril.

    • 1865-1937: Qualitative Federalism.

    • 1937-present: Cooperative Federalism.

    • Use the layer cake analogy to describe different federalism phases.

Page 16: Principles of Dual Federalism**

  • Key Principles:

    • National government operates via enumerated powers.

    • Limited national government constitutional purposes.

    • Each government exercises sovereign authority in its responsibilities.

    • Relationship marked by tension rather than cooperation.

Page 17: Reasons for Federal Government Growth**

  • Key Drivers:

    • The Great Depression led to increased national institutions.

    • Growth of federal regulatory and administrative agencies.

    • Perception that state and local governments are insufficient to meet needs.

Page 18: Cooperative Federalism**

  • Modern Federalism Model:

    • Described as a marble cake, showcasing mixed responsibilities.

    • Fiscal Federalism: Examining the interplay of government responsibilities and financial management.

Page 19: Federal Policy Influence**

  • Types of Mandates:

    • Direct Mandates: Require state compliance based on constitutional authority.

    • Indirect Mandates: Conditioned on state consent and federal funding receipt.

Page 20: Theory of Fiscal Federalism**

  • Government Functions:

    • Federal government captures revenue to control the economy while states allocate funds and implement programs.

Page 21: Influencing State Policy**

  • Financial Incentives:

    • Federal funding acts as leverage to encourage state participation in policy initiatives.

    • Continued reliance on funding shapes state constituencies benefiting from federal programs.

Page 22: Administrative Structure**

  • The Role of Government:

    • Perspectives from William Graham Summer (Libertarian), Edward Bellamy (Socialist), and Woodrow Wilson (Pragmatist) on government roles.

Page 23: Federalist 51 Reflection**

  • Need for Separation of Powers:

    • Government must have inherent self-governing mechanisms to maintain control.

Page 24: Positive vs. Higher Law**

  • Definitions:

    • Positive Law: Specific provisions in state constitutions.

    • Higher Law: Principles embodied in the Federal Constitution, subject to interpretation.

Page 25: Formation of American Administrative State**

  • Crisis Response:

    • American administrative state emerged from crisis and adaptability rather than careful planning.

    • Analogy of the Constitution as a log cabin, with administration filling gaps as needed.

Page 26: Characteristics of Early Administrative State**

  • Challenges Faced:

    • Incoherent personnel systems, weak regulatory machinery, and poor coordination.

    • Impact of the Depression Era and subsequent reforms of the 1960s.

Page 27: Political Process Participants**

  • Role of Legitimization:

    • Interaction between official and unofficial policy actors over extended periods.

    • Clear definitions and terms influence the complexity of policy making.

Page 28: Policy Domains**

  • Definition:

    • Refers to specific areas where various participants contest for influence and decision-making.

Page 29: Political Actors**

  • Types of Actors:

    • Official Actors: Elected public officials with constitutional authority.

    • Unofficial Actors: Private interests not authorized constitutionally.

  • Levels of Government:

    • Federal (US Constitution), State (State Constitution), Local (subject to state authority).

Page 30: Legislative Bodies**

  • Primary Policy Mechanisms:

    • Includes Congress, state legislatures, county commissioners, and city councils, often supported by administrative staff.

Page 31: The Chief Executive**

  • Role and Responsibility:

    • The chief executive is typically the sole elected official representing a political unit, responsible for oversight of administrative functions.

Page 32: Role of Courts**

  • Judicial System's Function:

    • The Supreme Court and lower courts interpret law, assure constitutional compliance, and respond to challenges.

Page 33: Features of Bureaucracy**

  • Key Elements:

    • Job specialization, hierarchical control, institutional knowledge, trained staff, and standard operating procedures.

Page 34: Unofficial Actors in Policy Process**

  • Role of Interests and Media:

    • Unofficial actors representing specific interests influence policy processes through their participation levels.

Page 35: Interest Groups**

  • The Power of Group Mobilization:

    • Groups, rather than individuals, effectively influence policy by mobilizing and gaining visibility among policymakers.

Page 36: Cornerstones of American Government**

  • Key Concepts:

    • Divided Power, Compromise, and Equilibrium emphasize characteristics needed for effective governance.

Page 37: Stability of Policy Fields**

  • Punctuated Equilibrium:

    • Explains how policy fields can remain stable until disrupted by significant events, leading to new policy adoption.

Page 38: Disruption of Equilibrium**

  • Focusing Events and Social Movements:

    • Factors that can shift focus and decision-making in policy fields.

Page 39: Policy Making Concepts**

  • Key Interactions:

    • Long-term engagement of both official and unofficial actors within specific policy domains (e.g., education, environment).

Page 40: Policy Operatives**

  • Types of Operatives:

    • Entrepreneurs (promote change), Technical Specialists (subject experts), Decision Makers (elected or administratively appointed), Mediators (influence from media/public opinion).

Page 41: Influence Dynamics**

  • Understanding Influence:

    • Influence is a collective activity, necessitating sacrifices for the greater good.

Page 42: Federalist 10 - Control of Factions**

  • Madison's Concerns:

    • Need for controlling inevitable factions to prevent tyranny by promoting a diverse union.

Page 43: Faction Control**

  • Necessary Measures:

    • Controlling faction causes may involve limiting liberty or homogenizing opinions.

Page 44: Pluralism**

  • Group Theory Model:

    • Policy outcomes are determined through competition and negotiations among various groups.

Page 45: Elitist Approaches**

  • Critique of Pluralism:

    • Suggests influential elite groups dominate policy-making processes at the expense of broader interests.

Page 46: Representation Issues**

  • Challenges for Lower & Working Classes:

    • Difficulty in organizing and exerting influence due to lack of resources and ineffective representation.

Page 47: Mancur Olson's Critique**

  • Interest Group Dynamics:

    • Argues that groups tend to form primarily to benefit their members, hampered by issues like the free-rider problem.

Page 48: Policy Decision Models**

  • Decision-Making Frameworks:

    • Rational, Community/Political Theory, and Strategic Decision-Making emphasize thorough consideration of alternatives and coordinated action toward predefined outcomes.

Page 49: Reality of Decision-Making**

  • Challenges in Government:

    • Difficulties in knowing public desires, leading to trade-offs for individual gains.

Page 50: Rational Decision-Making**

  • Characteristics:

    • Defined by clear objectives, full consideration of alternatives, with decisions aimed at maximizing benefits.

Page 51: Compromised Rationalism**

  • Herbert Simon's Perspective:

    • Limits in human rationality necessitate refined decision making focusing on practical limits and stakeholder satisfaction.

Page 52: Community Influence**

  • Group Decision-Making:

    • Emphasizes collective, community-driven choices based on personal values and cooperation.

Page 53: Political Model of Decision-Making**

  • Characteristics:

    • Ambiguous objectives, changing preferences, limited evaluation of costs and benefits, prioritizing the stability of power positions.

Page 54: Public Sector Decision-Making Challenges**

  • Obstacles:

    • Difficulty in agreeing on measurable outcomes, complex resource control, and political conflicts complicating effective governance.

Page 55: Incrementalism**

  • Realistic Approach:

    • Adjustments based on limited information and political realities, emphasizing gradual changes in policy.

Page 56: Incremental Strategies Can Be Effective**

  • Pragmatic Decision-Making:

    • Highlights targeted and intentional adjustments within existing policy frameworks.

Page 57: A + B = C Process Model**

  • Policy Development Steps:

    • Identifying problems, setting agendas, formulating proposals, legitimizing, implementing, evaluating, and refining policies.

Page 58: Policy Agenda**

  • Dimensions of Policy Agenda:

    • Ranges from vague issues to concrete decision agendas that transform into laws.

Page 59: Actors and the Agenda**

  • Competing Interests:

    • Official actors representing public interests versus unofficial actors with private aims.

Page 60: Agenda Setting Competition**

  • Control Dynamics:

    • Limited resources heighten competition for agenda placement, enabling specific groups to dominate the discourse.

Page 61: Social Construction of Reality**

  • Reality of Problems:

    • Consensus is necessary for issues to be recognized by the government as problems affecting the public.

Page 62: Use of Power**

  • Power Dynamics:

    • Different forms of power manifest in agenda placement processes, influencing governance and policy outcomes.

Page 63: Forms of Power/Authority**

  • Types Identified:

    • Positive, negative, and latent powers illustrate diverse influences on policy agendas.

Page 64: Policy Formation**

  • Process Overview:

    • Development of mechanisms to address public issues follows agenda placement.

Page 65: Alternative Selection Process**

  • Competitive Nature:

    • Many alternative proposals exist, with rational methods often constrained by political compromise.

Page 66: Solutions and Alternatives**

  • Proposed Solutions:

    • Various approaches like public funding for job creation, direct job initiatives, and tax reduction strategies to promote economic growth.

Page 67: Acceptability of Alternatives**

  • Criteria for Alternatives:

    • Must be technically feasible, affordable, and politically acceptable to gain traction in policy discussions.

Page 68: Factors Influencing Formulation**

  • Knowledge of Effects & Causes:

    • The presence or absence of information significantly influences policy formulation typologies.

Page 69: Policy Formulation Approaches**

  • Typologies Explained:

    • Routine (high knowledge of effects/cause), Incremental (status quo adjustment), Creative (innovative solutions), Conditional responses, and Craftsmanship (ad-hoc responses).

Page 70: Weber's Legitimate Authority**

  • Three Types:

    • Traditional, Charismatic, and Legal/Rational authority frameworks establish legitimacy in governance.

Page 71: Constitutional Authority**

  • Legitimization:

    • Actions grounded in constitutional law receive general public acceptance, ensuring the legitimacy of government actions.

Page 72: Characteristics of Legitimacy**

  • Public Perception:

    • Citizens must see government authority as legitimate and comply willingly with enacted policies.

Page 73: Majoritarian vs. Non-Majoritarian Legitimating**

  • Action Legitimacy Sources:

    • Majoritarian actions reflect popular legislative activities, whereas non-majoritarian actions may arise from court or bureaucratic decisions.

Page 74: Legitimization by Law**

  • Procedural Legitimacy:

    • Support from legislative review processes ensures bills are scrutinized, promoting accountability.

Page 75: Generality vs. Specificity in Legislation**

  • Drafting Laws:

    • Laws written broadly facilitate multiple interpretations, impacting political compromise.

Page 76: Administrative Law Making**

  • Rules and Regulations:

    • Administrative rules possess the force of law, with established procedures enacted under the Administrative Procedures Act.

Page 77: Judicial Review as Legitimacy Test**

  • Role of Courts:

    • Judicial actions protect individual rights and shape policy through rulings on constitutional legitimacy.

Page 78: Policy Implementation**

  • Nature of Implementation:

    • Translates legislative intentions into action, ensuring alignment with legal principles.

Page 79: Principal/Agent Paradigm**

  • Relationship Dynamics:

    • Policymakers (principals) trust administrators (agents) to implement policies effectively.

Page 80: Implementation Approaches**

  • Top-Down vs. Bottom-Up:

    • Top-down approaches may lack local sensitivity; bottom-up approaches favor local adaptation but risk deviations.

Page 81: Hierarchical Coordination**

  • Importance of Communication:

    • Effective communication between levels of government is crucial for performance and localized responsiveness.

Page 82: Performance Management Components**

  • Key Elements:

    • Clear measurable outcomes, performance indicators, appraisals, performance incentives, and resource allocation linked to performance.