PHYSICS 250 (Spring 2025) – Student Evaluation Summary

Quantitative Highlights

  • Course understanding advanced: median 4.54.5 (both sections)

  • Interest increased: medians 3.93.9 / 4.14.1

  • Expectations clear: median 4.84.8

  • Workload vs. same-credit courses: median 2.82.82.92.9 (≈“Typical”)

  • Instructor preparedness: median 4.94.9

  • Instructor clarity: median 4.94.9

  • Instructor respectfulness: median 4.94.9

  • Overall course excellence: medians 4.54.5 / 4.64.6

  • Overall instructor excellence: median 4.94.9

  • Textbook value lowest item: medians 2.72.7 / 2.82.8

  • Expected grades skew high: median 4.94.9 (≈“A”)

Major Strengths (Student-Identified)

  • Extremely prepared, clear, respectful, and passionate instructor

  • Recorded/async lectures: YouTube videos with embedded quizzes; students control pace

  • Abundant practice: homework (Mastering Physics), extra problems, in-video examples, studio worksheets

  • Flexible & responsive: grading tweaks, added practice, adjusted policies mid-term

  • Studio format:
    • 30-min concept reviews
    • Choice of talkative vs. quiet groups
    • Equation/summary sheet each unit

  • Office-hour access (daily, fast e-mail replies)

  • Organization: one-page Canvas layout, clear weekly schedules, fair exams aligned to taught material

  • Emphasis on real-world / biomedical applications (e.g., MRI)

Common Improvement Requests

  • Release content earlier (lectures, quizzes, HW, studio sheets) so students can work ahead

  • Exam leniency:
    • Option to drop lowest exam or do corrections
    • More partial credit / larger question pools

  • Additional practice: solved examples, step-by-step solutions, full practice exams

  • Workload balancing:
    • Fewer new units during exam weeks
    • Spread difficult chapters apart

  • Grading tweaks: shift HW/quiz to completion or provide automatic drops from start

  • Technical/format issues:
    • TopHat stability & backup plan
    • Remove YouTube ads or host videos elsewhere
    • Improve Pearson free-response tolerance

  • Studio enhancements: stronger facilitation, random TA check-ins, clearer collaboration expectations

  • More lead-instructor office hours (despite high current availability)

Notable Patterns

  • Textbook perceived as least helpful; students rely on instructor-made resources instead

  • Workload viewed as typical despite accelerated schedule

  • Vast majority rated instructor and course well above college & university medians

  • Repeated sentiment: “Best professor / course experience at UM”