PHYSICS 250 (Spring 2025) – Student Evaluation Summary
Quantitative Highlights
Course understanding advanced: median (both sections)
Interest increased: medians /
Expectations clear: median
Workload vs. same-credit courses: median – (≈“Typical”)
Instructor preparedness: median
Instructor clarity: median
Instructor respectfulness: median
Overall course excellence: medians /
Overall instructor excellence: median
Textbook value lowest item: medians /
Expected grades skew high: median (≈“A”)
Major Strengths (Student-Identified)
Extremely prepared, clear, respectful, and passionate instructor
Recorded/async lectures: YouTube videos with embedded quizzes; students control pace
Abundant practice: homework (Mastering Physics), extra problems, in-video examples, studio worksheets
Flexible & responsive: grading tweaks, added practice, adjusted policies mid-term
Studio format:
• 30-min concept reviews
• Choice of talkative vs. quiet groups
• Equation/summary sheet each unitOffice-hour access (daily, fast e-mail replies)
Organization: one-page Canvas layout, clear weekly schedules, fair exams aligned to taught material
Emphasis on real-world / biomedical applications (e.g., MRI)
Common Improvement Requests
Release content earlier (lectures, quizzes, HW, studio sheets) so students can work ahead
Exam leniency:
• Option to drop lowest exam or do corrections
• More partial credit / larger question poolsAdditional practice: solved examples, step-by-step solutions, full practice exams
Workload balancing:
• Fewer new units during exam weeks
• Spread difficult chapters apartGrading tweaks: shift HW/quiz to completion or provide automatic drops from start
Technical/format issues:
• TopHat stability & backup plan
• Remove YouTube ads or host videos elsewhere
• Improve Pearson free-response toleranceStudio enhancements: stronger facilitation, random TA check-ins, clearer collaboration expectations
More lead-instructor office hours (despite high current availability)
Notable Patterns
Textbook perceived as least helpful; students rely on instructor-made resources instead
Workload viewed as typical despite accelerated schedule
Vast majority rated instructor and course well above college & university medians
Repeated sentiment: “Best professor / course experience at UM”