human development #1
What is human development?
scientific study of continuity and change in human beings from conception until death
goal of developmental psychology: describe, explain, and optimize growth across the life span
Why study human development?
enriched, more complex understanding of:
self and others
as changing, dynamic beings
understand how to facilitate healthy development at any age
what systems/structures facilitate or inhibit optional growth & development
the only constant in life is change
“No one ever steps in the same river twice…” Heraclitus
to grow & develop is to change
“You Can’t Go Home Again” (T. Wolfe)
we are multifaceted beings
physical/biological: we are embodied beings with complex interplay between our bodies and minds
psychosocial: the integration of the psychological and social (relationships, identity, finding one’s place in the world)
cognitive: intellectual skills such as attention, memory, learning, reasoning, ability to process information
cultural: the influences of the larger environment in which we develop
individuals are product of nature & nurture
nature/nurture are inextricably interwoven in a dynamically interactive way
we experience both continuity & discontinuity in development
development consists of both a gradual accumulation of small changes as well as significant qualitative changes
qualitative changes
transitions/turning points: significant changes in roles/status (e.g: starting school, puberty, first job; leaving home; substantial change in direction)
we are bo b bb th similar & dissimilar to others
some parts of human development are experienced by all, some by some, and some by just one
cohorts: group of persons born at the same historical time & experience particular social changes within a particular culture at approx. same age
but are not experienced in the same way
unique life events: things that happen to us outside our control may cause relatively abrupt changes & produce long lasting effects
we are narrative beings
we learn about, and understand, our lives, and our families/loved ones by the stories we construct & tell ourselves & each other
Urie Bronfenbrenner’s Ecological Systems Theory (EST)
↪What are the systems & structures that influence a child’s development?
ecology: scientific study of the interaction of organisms & their environments
primary focus of EST
the interaction between child (nature) & environment (nurture) produces development
to understand who someone is, we must understand the environment & how the child interacts with it
assumptions:
individuals & environment are constantly fluid, dynamic, changing
Development is a “transactions progress” between person & environment
as individuals grow they understand & engage their ecosystem with more complexity and agency
EST consists of 3 components
1. person
2. proximal processes
3. contexts: 5 types
Concept #1: the person
physical, psychological, social attributes of a person influences their experiences
thus, different people experience the same setting on very different ways
Concept #2: proximal processes
frequent, long term. Increasingly complex activities a person engages within a particular setting
*proximal processes are the mechanisms that foster growth & development
spending time and learning from my parents and siblings
Concept #3: 5 types
contexts: one’s environment consists of five concentric circles
ranging from immediate face to face setting to border, encompassing social contexts
a) microsystems: setting where proximal processes occur, consisting of specific activities, relationships, and roles
examples: living room, classroom, daycare, friend’s house, sports fields
Developmentally Optimal Microsystems Will Have:
1. engaging/stimulating activities that are varied, frequent, and grow in complexity
2. relationships are characterized by warmth & reciprocity
Bronfenbenner: “somebody has to be crazy about that kid”
3. Mesosystem
the connections between a person’s microsystems
a growth enhancing mesosystem will contain:
microsystems: that are mutually supportive
multiple “links” of adults & peers that share multiple settings
4. Exosystem
settings that do not involve the developing person but nevertheless affect them
provide specific examples of being significantly affected (positive/negative) as a child/adolescent by settings that you did not participate in
5. Macrosystem
sociocultural influence (belief systems, values, cultural practices, economic/educational systems)
a child may be influenced by multiple, overlapping cultural, national, religious macrosystem
6. Chronosystem
time: development occurs in a historical context
one’s development is not only effect by people, activities, settings, and culture but also by historical events
Take Away Lessons from EST
1. Children develop through relationships. Proximal processes are essential
2. A child’s development is inextricably linked with the context in which it occurs
Attachment
the close emotional tie between infant and caregiver
Stranger Anxiety/Separation Distress
general wariness of unfamiliar adults/sadness at separation from caregivers
in every culture beginning about 8 months
The Science of Attachment
Sigmund Freud/Psychoanalytic view: strong attachment is a product of infant’s biological need for nourishment
Harry Harlow’s Contact Comfort Study
the surprising importance of contact comfort in the formation of an infant's love for its mother
contrary the predictions of psychoanalytic theory, physical contact with the mother was more important than food in the formation of attachments
Testing Infant/Caregiver Attachment
Mary Ainsworth
securely attached infants will use the caregiver as a secure base from which to explore the world
attachment quality is assessed in the Ainsworth Strange Situation Test (ASST):
a series of separations & reunions between infants & their caregivers in an unfamiliar playroom
most important episode is reunion episode
Ainsworth’s Strange Situation
quality of attachment has four basic patterns:
securely attached
insecure - resistant
insecure - avoidant
disorganized - disoriented
secure attachment: seeks comfort from the caregiver during the reunion and then return to independent play
uses the caregiver as a secure base from which to explore
insecure-resistant attachment: show ambivalent responses during reunions, first approaching caregiver & then pushing away
may actively resist any attempts to be comforted
disorganized-disoriented attachment: display contradictory behavior
both drawn to and fearful of caregiver’ frozen postures, sitting and staring
Possible Causes of Attachment Style
parent’s ability to create a warm, sensitive relationship
child’s temperament
dynamic/relational issues
Intergenerational Transmission
infant’s attachment quality is related to the parent’s own attachment with parents
disorganized-disoriented infants can be explained by mother’s trauma history
Adult Relationships
Bowlby: attachment effects
an internal working model
a sense of self, other people & new situations/stable interaction patterns
our relationship with caregiver is template we carry over to new relationships
Questions to Consider:
do caregivers “shape” or “discover” their child’s personality?
how do nature/nurture interact in childhood development?
Temperament
temperament: stable (over time & situations) behavioral/emotional directions to the environment due to genetic profile
Focus on temperament shows:
child’s behavior is not only a product of environmental influences
children differ in susceptibility to environmental stressor
Common ways of describing temperament
bold/cautious; inhibited/uninhibited
fussy, restrained, exuberant, timid, fearful, anxious, impulsive, active, passive
9 dimensions of temperament
activity level: how active is the child?
rhythmicity: regularity of bodily functions
approach/withdrawal: (bold/timid): initial reaction toward novel people/situations
adaptability: ability to modify/soothe initial reactions (e.g.:anger, joy, fear, frustration)
intensity of reactions: amount of energy put into positive/negative reactions
threshold of responsiveness: level at which child notices a stimulus
quality of mood: are reactions positive or negative?
distractibility: extent to which child can be easily interrupted from current activity/mood
attention span: length of time engaged in task with no interference
Temperamental Clusters
difficult children: high withdrawal, low rhythmicity, negative mood, low adaptability, high intensity of reaction
easy children: high approach, high rhythmicity, positive mood, high adaptability, low intensity reaction
slow to warm up children: high withdrawal, slow to adapt, low intensity negative reaction
Parenting Styles: D. Baumrind
parenting behaviors & attitudes that set the emotional climate & expectations for parent/child interactions
parenting styles based on 2 dimensions
responsiveness: degree of warmth/support/acceptance shown towards child
demandingness: degree of expectation of adherence to standards/compliance
authoritarian: high demandingness/low responsiveness
oriented to obedience, authority, compliance
power assertive, unidirectional communication
authoritative: high demandingness/high responsiveness
child does have some autonomy but clear, firm standards & limits are enforced
child’s perspective is respected and responded to, dialogical approach
permissive/indulgent: low demandingness/high responsiveness
Responsive to child’s needs but little expectation of child self-regulation
rejecting/neglecting; indifferent: low demandingness; low responsiveness
caregiver focused on own needs rather than child’s
no limits or monitoring a child’s behavior
Bidirectionality of Parent-Child Interactions
parents affect children’s characteristics, and vice versa
over time, this effect reinforces and perpetuates each party’s behavior
the child’s characteristics are one of the strongest influences on parenting styles
child’s temperament (easy, difficult, slow to warm) as well as attractiveness impacts parenting
SES: working class parents more likely to use authoritarian parenting
high SES parents more likely to use democratic dialogical parenting style
ethnic/cultural differences: authoritarian parenting may be more accepted, and successful, in traditional/non-Western, communitarian based cultures