International Relations Test – Complete Human Security Reading Notes
Agency and Machines
Coker uses Bruno Latour’s theory, stating that agency is relational and comes from interactions between humans and tools.
AI lacks motivation, intention, and consciousness, which are central to human agency.
Autonomous Weapons
Systems such as Israel’s Harop drone and the U.S. Sea Hunter are semi-autonomous raising ethical concerns because their decision-making bypasses human moral judgement.
Ethics and Intelligence
Machines may beat humans in logic-based decision-making, but they lack rationality in the human sense, like emotional awareness, purpose, and ethical reasoning.
AI cannot “choose” peace, and can only follow code.
Actors vs Agents
AI can act (execute tasks) but cannot be agents (make autonomous moral decisions).
They do not possess teleology or social intentionality.
Peace requires human empathy and diplomacy.
Human Security Implications
AI risks dehumanizing war and removing accountability.
Machines may reduce operational risk but cannot engage in reconciliation or peacebuilding, which is crucial for lasting human security.
AI may amplify state power but must remain under ethical human oversight.
Human security necessitates keeping humans in the loop to ensure peace and justice.
Boko Haram: Time for an Alternative Approach
Failure of governance, corruption, and social inequality in northern Nigeria created fertile ground for Boko Haram.
A purely military response has exacerbated the humanitarian crisis, displaced civilians, and increased radicalization.
A shift is needed toward development-oriented and community-based strategies as a sustainable solution.
Boko Haram has undermined personal, economic, and political security, particularly for women and children.
Military approaches often ignore root causes such as poverty, unemployment, and social marginalization.
Development, education, and political inclusion are necessary for achieving lasting peace.
Policy Recommendations
Incorporate youth and civil society in peacebuilding efforts.
Strengthen regional cooperation and intelligence sharing.
Invest in long-term solutions including infrastructure, education, and local governance.
A multidimensional approach rooted in human security principles is necessary to counter Boko Haram’s influence effectively.
African Solutions to African Problems
AfSol prioritizes local knowledge, regional cooperation, and traditional mechanisms of conflict resolution.
Western-led interventions often fail to account for cultural specificity and long-term development needs.
Regional organizations such as the African Union and ECOWAS are better placed to handle local crises through contextual understanding.
AfSol aligns with human security’s emphasis on people-centered solutions.
Local ownership and participation are key to addressing root causes of insecurity (e.g., poverty, identity conflicts).
Incorporating indigenous values and governance mechanisms enhances legitimacy and effectiveness.
Case Studies
African Union Mission in Somalia (AMISOM): Demonstrates African-led peace enforcement, though dependent on external funding.
Gacaca courts in Rwanda: A local mechanism for transitional justice that reinforced community healing.
Critiques
Regional bodies often lack capacity and funding, limiting effectiveness.
Risk of elite capture and authoritarian abuse in the name of “African solutions”.
While AfSol offers a promising framework aligned with human security, it must be supported by institutional capacity, accountability, and inclusive governance.
Preventive Diplomacy and the Lake Malawi Dispute
The Lake Malawi dispute is rooted in colonial-era demarcation ambiguities and competition over oil and gas exploration.
Preventive diplomacy, as practiced by the Southern African Development Community (SADC) and the African Union (AU), helped to avoid armed conflict.
Early engagement and diplomatic mediation are emphasized as cost-effective and sustainable conflict prevention strategies.
Preventive diplomacy prioritizes peaceful resolution over military engagement, aligning with the human security principle of freedom from fear.
The dispute affects economic and environmental security, particularly for lakeside communities dependent on fishing and agriculture.
Successful diplomacy avoided displacement and infrastructural damage that often follow border conflicts.
Challenges Identified
Regional diplomatic bodies face limitations in enforcement and are often constrained by state sovereignty concerns.
Resource-based conflicts are prone to flare-ups without institutionalized cooperation mechanisms.
Policy Recommendations
Institutionalize preventive diplomacy with binding protocols and timely intervention.
Enhance transparency and joint resource management in disputed zones.
Incorporate civil society actors to strengthen local participation and legitimacy.
The Lake Malawi case illustrates how diplomacy can uphold human security by addressing disputes early.
Emphasizes the importance of dialogue, regional cooperation, and inclusive processes in Africa’s peace and security architecture.
AMISOM and Regional Peacekeeping
AMISOM was launched in 2007 to support the transitional government, combat Al-Shabaab insurgents, and create space for political stabilization.
Troop contributions came from African countries such as Uganda, Burundi, Kenya, and Ethiopia.
Human Security Implications
AMISOM contributed to personal security by protecting civilians from Al-Shabaab attacks and providing secure zones.
It aimed to restore political security by enabling democratic governance and elections.
The mission also addressed economic and community security through infrastructure repair and access to aid.
Challenges
Accusations of human rights abuses and civilian casualties undermined trust in the mission.
Dependency on international funding (notably from the EU) limited AU autonomy.
Logistical and strategic coordination among troop-contributing countries was often weak.
Successes and Lessons
Helped reclaim major cities from militants and enabled humanitarian access.
Demonstrated potential for African-led interventions using local knowledge and regional legitimacy.
Reinforced the need for integrated approaches combining military, political, and developmental strategies.
AMISOM is a benchmark for regionally-led conflict management.
It supports the idea that African institutions can play a central role in upholding human security when properly resourced and coordinated.
Cyberpower and Global Insecurity
Cyberpower refers to the ability to use digital networks to influence, disrupt, or damage enemy states or populations.
States are increasingly vulnerable to cyberattacks that can paralyze infrastructure without a single bullet being fired.
Cyberwarfare challenges traditional military doctrine, undermines deterrence theory, and redefines the battlefield.
Relevance to Human Security
Cyberattacks can cripple hospitals, water systems, and financial institutions, threatening economic, health, and infrastructure security.
Disinformation campaigns can incite political violence and erode community security by targeting ethnic, religious, or political groups.
Civilian populations are the most vulnerable, particularly in less technologically advanced states that lack cyber defense mechanisms.
Examples
Alleged Russian cyber-interference in U.S. and European elections.
Stuxnet virus (US-Israeli) against Iran’s nuclear program as a precedent for state-level offensive cyber use.
The rise of cybercrime targeting developing economies and marginalized communities.
Policy Implications
Cybersecurity must be viewed as a public good, requiring international norms and multilateral cooperation.
Human security advocates should push for inclusion of cyber threats in peacebuilding frameworks.
There's a pressing need to bridge the digital divide and support digital literacy to defend against cyber manipulation.
Cyberpower reshapes how insecurity is produced and experienced.
It further blurs the lines between war and peace and between military and civilian domains, demanding a renewed human security approach that includes the digital realm.
Quick Summaries for Revision
Coker (2019) – Artificial Intelligence and the Future of War: AI is reshaping war but cannot replace human conscience or responsibility. Human security requires human agency.
Santos (2014) – Boko Haram: Time for an Alternative Approach: Boko Haram thrives due to poor governance. A human security approach must include education and development.
Lobakeng (2017) – African Solutions to African Problems: AfSol supports using African institutions to solve conflicts. Human security improves when local voices shape peace efforts.
Lalbahadur (2016) – Preventive Diplomacy and the Lake Malawi Dispute: Preventive diplomacy helped avoid conflict. Regional cooperation protected communities, which is a peaceful model for resolving African disputes.
AMISOM – African Union Peacekeeping Case Study: AMISOM helped secure Somalia. It shows African leadership can promote security when supported.
Coker (Cyberpower and Global Insecurity): Cyberattacks can damage civilian life, requiring a broader human security lens to protect digital infrastructure.
Extended Summaries for All Readings
Coker (2019) – Artificial Intelligence and the Future of War: AI in warfare challenges agency and ethics. AI lacks moral reasoning and empathy. Human security must not be outsourced to machines.
Santos (2014) – Boko Haram: Time for an Alternative Approach: Military approaches have deepened insecurity. A human security approach requires addressing socioeconomic conditions and investing in education.
Lobakeng (2017) – African Solutions to African Problems: AfSol emphasizes African-led responses, using indigenous mechanisms and regional institutions. It aligns with human security, which advocates for context-sensitive strategies.
Lalbahadur (2016) – Preventive Diplomacy and the Lake Malawi Dispute: Diplomatic engagement prevented violent conflict. Regional cooperation and conflict prevention uphold both state and human security.
AMISOM – African Union Peacekeeping Case Study: AMISOM stabilized major cities and restored governance. Despite criticisms, it shows that African-led peacekeeping can effectively respond to regional threats when paired with long-term development.
Coker (Cyberpower and Global Insecurity): Cyberwarfare poses existential risks to civilian life. A revised human security approach must include cyber resilience and international cooperation.