POLI week 2- constitutions
POLI 1P98 Lecture 2.1: The Canadian Constitution- The Master Institution
Three Main Institutions of Canadian Government
Institution- a set of legal and normative rules (norm- ideas) (legal- constitution itself), determines who makes public policy, and tells us what policy actors are allowed to do and not to do
Three main institutions in Canada:
1. Parliamentary Government
House of Commons (representative member that we vote for ex. Chris Bittle)
Senate (appointed)
Fusion of powers system- our executive branch is fused with the legislative branch
PM is the head of government
The Crown in the head of state
There is a principle called responsible government- the idea that the PM has to maintain confidence in the house of commons
2. Federalism
Canada has two sovereign levels of government that each have their own powers (fed and prov.)
Federalism- is the division of powers
Ex. healthcare is Provincial, Military is Federal
3. Constitutionalism
The constitution is what we call the master institution because it shapes everything
Constitutionalism- means that we as a country believe that the constitution is our law, we have govt officials that abide by the constitution, and we have courts that inforce the constitution
Constitutions
Constitution:
The highest level of law in a political system
Constitutional law trumps all other types of law (ex. CCC), the constitution is supreme
Contains rules about how political power is structured, exercised and constrained
Rules for making rules
Constitutions are rarely just single documents
Written and unwritten documents
Constitutions are intended to be relatively permanent
The written parts of constitutions can be changed through the use of amending formulae
Is it in the Constitution?
Senators must be 30 years old and own $4,000 worth of property
true
The federal government can veto provincial legislation that it does not like
Technically true- disallowance clause, but we haven’t used it in a very long time
The PM is appointed by the Crown, not elected by the people
True on a convention
Same-sex marriage rights are protected
True based on judicial decisions (anologuos grounds)
Constitutionalism
Constitutionalism: when the actors in the political system recognize the constitution as legitimate, play within its rules, and accept the judiciary’s role in interpreting the constitution.
“Constitutional monarchy”
King is the head of state, and that power of the crown is entrenched in both the law and the constitution
Elements of Constitutionalism:
Rule of Law- equal before and under the law
Constitutional laws trump all other laws
Judicial interpretation of the constitution
Constitutions and Courts
Constitutions require enforcement and interpretation
Usually by courts – independent dispute resolution through law
Judicial review: when judges decide whether state actions are legal
Remedies: striking down; reading in
Example: Carter v. Canada [2015]; Miron v. Trudel [1995]
POLI 1P98: Lecture 2.2- How the Canadian Constitution Shapes Policymaking
Sources of Canadian Constitutional Law
Entrenched constitutional law
Non-entrenched constitutional law (Profound Impacts- Apart of institutional law)
Constitutional conventions- Unwritten Principle viewed by political actors in terms of working, ex. If PM violates one of these conventions he is seen as untrustworthy)
Judicial decisions
Entrenched Constitutional Law
Two most important entrenched constitutional documents:
1. Constitution Act, 1867
Canada’s founding constitutional document
Contains the federal division of powers (s. 91-95) and ensures that Canada has parliamentary government (preamble)
2. Constitution Act, 1982
Contains the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms (s. 1-32) and the notwithstanding clause (s. 33)
NTWS- allows Parliament or provincial legislatures to temporarily override sections 2 and 7–15 of the Charter.
Protects existing indigenous rights (s. 35)
Example of Notwithstanding Clause Usage
2023: Saskatchewan Government
Invokes NTWS to prevent children under 16 from changing names or pronouns at school w/o parental consent (“Parents’ Bill of Rights Act”)
Non- Entrenched Constitutional Law
Two prominent examples:
Supreme Court Act, 1875
Clarity Act, 2000
Constitutional Conventions
Two prominent examples:
Confidence convention
Ceremonial role of the Crown
Judicial Decisions
Pre-Charter court cases:
Series of cases on the federal-provincial division of powers
Post-Charter court cases:
The courts have taken an active role in expanding Canadian citizens’ Charter rights
Case Study: Canada (AG) v. Bedford 2013
Laws relating to sex work are unconstitutional as they jeopardize s.7 security of the person
S.210: indictable offence to keep a bawdy-house
S.212(1)(j): prohibits living off the avails of prostitution
S.213(1)(c): prohibits communicating in public for the purposes of prostitution (solicitation)
Policy Response: Bill C-36, Protection of Communities and Exploited Person’s Act
For the first time in Canadian criminal law, Bill C-36 criminalizes the purchase of sexual services
Section 286.1: “Everyone who, in any place, obtains for consideration, or communicates with anyone for the purpose of obtaining for consideration, the sexual services of a person is guilty of an indictable offence.”
Impact of Constitutional Law
Constitutional supremacy means that public policy must adhere to constitutional law in all of its forms
Post-Charter impact on public policymaking has been massive
“Legalized Politics” and “Judicialization”