Delphy and Leonard on Gender Roles
Delphy and Leonard:
Feminist writers who focused on the familiar exploitation of women in the family
Saw the exploitation of women in the family not as a benefit to capitalism, but rather as a benefit to men
The family is patriarchal in nature and allows men to have a sense of authority at home
Domestic labour:
The domestic labour that females provided at home would have been rewarded with wages outside of the home
Deemed to be ‘non-productive’ when performed in the home- lost their worth and were not counted in the economy
Home is not a refuge from work for women, but rather an economic microsystem of its own
Work performed by women is ‘invisible’ and forms part of a set of expectations of being a wife and mother
Domestic labour is gendered and when males perform tasks in the home, this is seen as ‘helping out’ rather than a duty
Men are seen as having minimal responsibilities towards childcare- they ‘babysit’ their own children
Roles of males:
A man’s time in the home was used for leisure based on assumptions that his work was completed outside of the home
Women did not receive such leisure time, as assumptions were made about them enjoying housework and childcare
Domains of the household were referred to as being part of a woman’s world- ‘her kitchen’ etc.
Evaluations:
Links to work of others such as Oakley, Duncombe and Marsden with dual burden and triple shift
Recent changes in the division of labour still see women doing more than their male counterparts- Gershunny refers to this as a form of ‘lagged adaption’
Ignores the role of capitalism in shaping the economics of ‘gendered labour’ as being lower status
The role of dual burden and triple shift is taken on in lone-parent families without the presence of males
Dunne found there to be greater equality in domestic labour in lesbian households