Scales, Standards, Units and Significant Figures

Identification and Counting of Significant Figures

  • Each non-zero digit within a number is classified as a significant figure.

  • Zeros are included in the count of significant figures only under specific conditions:

    • When they are positioned between two non-zero digits.

    • When they are located at the end of the decimal part of a number.

  • Examples identified in practice include:

    • The number 20002000 contains only 11 significant figure, which is the digit 22.

    • The number 2000.02000.0 contains 55 significant figures, as the trailing zero in the decimal part is counted.

Procedures for Estimation and Rounding

  • To estimate a number to a specific precision, significant figures are removed starting from the right until the desired number of significant figures is reached.

  • Rounding must be applied as figures are removed to ensure accuracy.

  • Example of rounding procedure:

    • The value 6.8276.827 possesses 44 significant figures.

    • If this value must be expressed to 33 significant figures, the digit 77 must be removed.

    • Because the digit 77 is removed, the preceding digit is rounded up, resulting in a value of 6.836.83.

Significant Figure Rules for Mathematical Operations

  • When handling experimentally measured values of varying significant digits, specific rules must be applied during addition and subtraction.

  • Rule for Addition and Subtraction:

    • When two experimentally measured numbers are added or subtracted, the total number of significant figures or digits in the final result must be equal to the smallest number of decimal places found in any individual term within the sum or difference.

  • Example Application of the Addition Rule:

    • Consider the addition of two measured values: 9.659.65 and 8.48.4.

    • The term providing the limiting precision is 8.48.4, as it contains the least number of decimal places (one decimal place) compared to 9.659.65.

    • While the mathematical sum of these values is 18.0518.05, the reported experimental sum must be rounded to match the least precise term.

    • Consequently, the correct sum is 18.118.1 and not 18.0518.05.