Introduction to Cell Biology - Flashcards
What is Life?
Seven core characteristics (in the slide, listed with numbers but presented as a complete set):
Order
Reproduction
Growth and development
Energy processing
Regulation
Response to the environment
Evolutionary adaptation
Question framed: WHAT IS LIFE?
Themes of Biology
Organization
Information
Energy and Matter
Interactions
Evolution
Classification and Diversity
Domains:
Domain Bacteria (a)
Domain Archaea (b)
Domain Eukarya (c)
Typical cell size examples shown:
2 \mu m
100 \mu m
Kingdoms (within Eukarya shown):
Kingdom Animalia
Kingdom Plantae
Kingdom Fungi
Protists
Purpose: Classifying life
DNA is Universal
DNA is the chemical substance of genes; blueprint for heritable traits
Base letters (DNA alphabet): A, T, C, G
Example sequence snippet shown: A \; T \; C \; G \; C \; G \; A \; T \; A \; T \; G \; G \ldots C
Implication: Diversity of life arises from differences in DNA sequences
Note: Foundational topics will be covered in BIO 2001
DNA and Genes
Genes are the blueprints for proteins, the building blocks of life
Diversity of life arises from differences in DNA sequences
Core idea linking genotype (DNA) to phenotype (proteins and traits)
Summary line: You will cover all of these topics in BIO 2001
Evolution and Diversity
Evolution drives the diversity of life
Charles Darwin (1859): "descent with modification" (descend with modification)
Evolution = change over generations that is inherited by offspring of a population
Natural selection is one mechanism for evolution
Individuals that are most fit produce more offspring which share their traits
Those fit traits become more common over generations
Note: More detail to come in the next lecture
Process of Science
Key components of scientific method/activity:
EXPLORATION AND DISCOVERY
FORMING AND TESTING HYPOTHESES
SOCIETAL BENEFITS AND OUTCOMES
COMMUNITY ANALYSIS AND FEEDBACK
Mimicry Case Study: Coral Snake vs Scarlet King Snake
Eastern coral snake (venomous) vs Scarlet king snake (nonvenomous)
Traditional rhyme to distinguish species:
"Red on yellow, kill a fellow; Red on black, friend of Jack"
Alternative rhyme capturing variation: "Red into black, venom lack; red into yellow, kill a fellow."
Concept: Mimicry involves the mimic sharing a perceptual attribute with the model to avoid predation
Core mechanism: Selection is driven by the signal-receiver (predator)
Geographic Distribution and Mimicry Dynamics
Geographic distribution: eastern coral snake and scarlet king snake have partially overlapping ranges
Roles: venomous model vs nonvenomous mimic; predator–prey interactions influenced by geography
Visual of interaction: predator responds to color patterns that signal venom or nonvenom
Hypothesis in Mimicry Study
Hypothesis: The scarlet king snake will be preyed upon less often in regions that overlap with the eastern coral snake
Variables:
Venomous model (eastern coral snake) present vs absent
Mimic (scarlet king snake) vs nonmimic (plain brown)
Predator: real or simulated predation pressure
Experimental Design: Mimicry Study
Use artificial snakes (scarlet king snakes and plain brown snakes)
Place in areas that either contain or lack eastern coral snakes
Outcome measure: count the number of attacks on artificial snakes
Data presentation: graph the data as the percentage of total attacks on artificial snakes
Data Analysis: Mimicry Results (Presumed interpretation from slides)
Percent of total attacks on artificial snakes
In coral snake absent vs present conditions:
Artificial brown snakes: around 83\% and 84\% of total attacks
Artificial king snakes (mimics): around 17\% and 16\% of total attacks
Implication: Mimics experience fewer attacks than nonmimics, supporting mimicry theory under the tested conditions
Experimental Interpretation
Question: Can these results be extended to larger questions about mimicry and evolution?
Considerations:
Mechanisms explaining results (e.g., signal perception by predators, learning, and generalization)
How mimicry affects fitness and allele frequencies over generations
Was This Result Expected?
Revisit: The observed attack patterns (approximately 83–84% on nonmimics vs 16–17% on mimics) align with expectations of selective protection for mimics when a venomous model is present
The consistency of results across coral-snake present/absent conditions is discussed
Classroom Activity: YOUR Turn
Now it's YOUR turn!
Form groups of 3–4
Elect one person to take notes
Florida Camouflage Study: Background Information
Three population contexts:
Inland population
Beach population
Gulf of Mexico population
Geographic framing: Florida region with inland and coastal (beach) habitats
Visual map labels indicate areas: Inland population, Beach population, Gulf of Mexico
Research Question: Camouflage and Predation by Owls
Does camouflage protect the mouse from predation by the owl?
Three populations considered: Inland, Gulf of Mexico, Beach
Hypothesis (Florida study framing)
Not explicitly stated in the transcript, but context implies: camouflage (coloration matching habitat) reduces predation risk by owls in a given habitat
Experimental Design (Florida camouflage study)
Habitats considered: Inland, Gulf of Mexico, Beach
Model types:
Light models
Dark models
Treatment groups:
Camouflaged (control)
Non-camouflaged (experimental)
Overall design: test predation on different color morphs across habitats to assess camouflage effectiveness
Data Analysis: Predation on Models
Metric: Percentage of attacked models
Example data layout shown in the slide:
Habitat-specific comparisons (Beach vs Inland)
Models: light vs dark; camouflage status (camouflaged vs non-camouflaged)
Visual: graphs plotting percentage of attacks for each model type and habitat (0 to 100 scale)
Results Visualization (Beaches vs. Inland)
Beach habitat vs Inland habitat displays the rate of predation on light and dark models under camouflaged vs non-camouflaged conditions
Observed trend: camouflage generally reduces predation in the tested contexts, but specifics depend on habitat and model color
Conclusion?
Slide leaves the question open with a placeholder: "Conclusion?"
Encourages students to integrate data across habitats to draw a general conclusion about camouflage efficacy in owl predation
Evidence for Evolution Video and Homework (Course Wrap-Up)
Video link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cC8k2Sb1oQ8
Homework for Friday, 8/22/2025 by classtime (2:00 pm EDT):
Watch the video (9:22) and take notes
List evidences for evolution for each of the 4 main groups (at least 2 examples per group)
Provide 3 facts about Charles Darwin
Upload to Blackboard as a Word or pdf file
Evidences for Evolution to cover:
Fossil evidence
Biogeographical evidence
Anatomical evidence
Biochemical evidence (includes DNA)
Evidences for Evolution (Overview)
Fossil evidence
Biogeographical evidence
Anatomical evidence
Biochemical evidence (including DNA)
Note: This list is framed for the homework task, and aligns with the four main groups of evolutionary evidence
Quick References and Concepts to Remember
DNA base pairs: A\text{-}T and C\text{-}G
Gene-protein relationship: Genes → proteins → traits
Evolutionary mechanism: Natural selection as a driver of adaptation
Mimicry definitions: Model, Mimic, Signal-receiver, Predator
Camouflage studies: Habitat-specific effectiveness of coloration in reducing predation
Process of science sections highlight how hypotheses are formed, tested, analyzed, and interpreted in a societal context
The content links foundational biology (DNA, evolution) to practical, real-world cases (mimicry, camouflage) and to the scientific method
1859 is a key year for Darwin’s theory: Darwin, C. (1859) On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection
All numerical values included here are provided as figures from the transcript, for study context. If you need additional clarification on any specific figure or data point, I can extract and format it more precisely.