Aldehydes & Ketones Master-Class: Oxidation, Nucleophilic Additions, Acetals, Imines, Wittig Administrative & Study Logistics Midterm prep strategySecond class session = dedicated problem-solving marathon. Review your returned quiz (handed back at end of class) and visit office hours for questions. Extra–problem sourcesInstructor’s problems are lifted directly from recommended books (esp. Janice G. Smith – Organic Chemistry ); specific chapters listed in syllabus. Message: “If I recommend it, that’s exactly what you should be studying.” Oxidation & Reduction Fundamentals Oxidizing alcohols → carbonyls1° ROH → CH < e m > 2 Cl < / e m > 2 PCC Aldehyde \text{1° ROH}\xrightarrow[\text{CH}<em>2\text{Cl}</em>2]{\text{PCC}}\text{Aldehyde} 1° ROH PCC CH < e m > 2 Cl < / e m > 2 Aldehyde (only mild PCC works; strong Cr(VI) gives carboxylic acid).2° ROH → H < e m > 2 O PCC or CrO < / e m > 3 / H + Ketone \text{2° ROH}\xrightarrow[H<em>2O]{\text{PCC\ or\ CrO}</em>3/H^+}\text{Ketone} 2° ROH PCC or CrO < / e m > 3/ H + H < e m > 2 O Ketone (either mild or strong reagents OK).3° alcohols: no oxidation (no α-hydrogen). Further oxidationAldehyde → CrO 3 / H + Carboxylic Acid \text{Aldehyde}\xrightarrow{\text{CrO}_3/H^+}\text{Carboxylic Acid} Aldehyde CrO 3 / H + Carboxylic Acid (aldehyde → acid already “built-in” during strong oxidations of 1° ROH). Friedel–Crafts acylationAr–H + R C O C l → A l C l 3 Aryl Ketone \text{Ar–H}+RCOCl\xrightarrow{AlCl_3}\text{Aryl Ketone} Ar–H + R C O C l A l C l 3 Aryl Ketone Carbonyl can be reduced later. Catalytic hydrogenolysis of aryl ketonesAr–CO–R → P d / P t / N i H < e m > 2 Ar–CH</em>2–R \text{Ar–CO–R}\xrightarrow[{Pd/Pt/Ni}]{H<em>2}\text{Ar–CH</em>2–R} Ar–CO–R H < e m > 2 P d / P t / N i Ar–CH</em>2–R (acyl group → alkyl). Hydride reductionsAldehyde → H < e m > 2 O N a B H < / e m > 4 1° alcohol \text{Aldehyde}\xrightarrow[H<em>2O]{NaBH</em>4}\text{1° alcohol} Aldehyde N a B H < / e m > 4 H < e m > 2 O 1° alcohol Ketone → H < e m > 2 O N a B H < / e m > 4 2° alcohol \text{Ketone}\xrightarrow[H<em>2O]{NaBH</em>4}\text{2° alcohol} Ketone N a B H < / e m > 4 H < e m > 2 O 2° alcohol L i A l H 4 LiAlH_4 L i A l H 4 interchangeable but added in separate dry step.Diagnostic tip: single new R = hydride; two new R = Grignard. Carbon Nucleophile Review (Grignard) R M g B r + Aldehyde → 2° alcohol RMgBr + \text{Aldehyde} \rightarrow \text{2° alcohol} R M g B r + Aldehyde → 2° alcohol R M g B r + Ketone → 3° alcohol RMgBr + \text{Ketone} \rightarrow \text{3° alcohol} R M g B r + Ketone → 3° alcohol Nucleophilic carbon = “C–Mg” bond; step-2 aqueous/acid work-up regenerates neutral product. Cleaving Alkenes to Aldehydes/Ketones/Acids Ozonolysis (reductive work-up; e.g.
Alkene → M e < e m > 2 S O < / e m > 3 2 Carbonyls \text{Alkene}\xrightarrow[Me<em>2S]{O</em>3}\text{2 Carbonyls} Alkene O < / e m > 3 M e < e m > 2 S 2 Carbonyls )Mechanistically: simply “insert O” and split; excellent aldehyde generator. Hot K M n O < e m > 4 / H < / e m > 2 O KMnO<em>4/\text{H}</em>2O K M n O < e m > 4/ H < / e m > 2 O cleavageSame C=C split plus over-oxidation of any vinylic H into −COOH \text{−COOH} −COOH . Fits mnemonic: “Permanganate usually ends as carboxylic acid unless cold dihydroxylation.” Oxygen Nucleophiles with Carbonyls (Acid Catalysis Mandatory) Universal first step under H + H^+ H + : protonate the carbonyl O — eliminates possibility of negative charges. 1. Hydration → Geminal Diols Ald./Ket. + H 2 O → H + Gem-Diol (HO–C–OH) \text{Ald./Ket.}+H_2O\xrightarrow{H^+}\text{Gem-Diol (HO–C–OH)} Ald./Ket. + H 2 O H + Gem-Diol (HO–C–OH) MechanismProtonate C=O. H2O attack. De-protonate to regenerate acid. 2. Alcohol Addition → Hemiacetals Ald./Ket. + R O H → H + Hemiacetal (HO–C–OR) \text{Ald./Ket.}+ROH\xrightarrow{H^+}\text{Hemiacetal (HO–C–OR)} Ald./Ket. + R O H H + Hemiacetal (HO–C–OR) ImportanceAll carbohydrates (glucose, fructose, galactose, etc.) are cyclic hemiacetals. The anomeric carbon = only carbon bearing two heteroatoms (OH & OR) ; site of biological reactivity. Cyclic hemiacetal formationIntramolecular version where internal OH acts as nucleophile. Ring size determined by which OH attacks (5-membered = furanose, 6-membered = pyranose). Procedure: number the chain, choose attacking O, draw ring first, then add substituents. Ald./Ket. + 2 R O H → H + Acetal (RO–C–OR) + H 2 O \text{Ald./Ket.}+2 ROH\xrightarrow{H^+}\text{Acetal (RO–C–OR)} + H_2O Ald./Ket. + 2 R O H H + Acetal (RO–C–OR) + H 2 O Mechanistic highlights (SN1-like)Protonate carbonyl. ROH attack → hemiacetal. Proton transfer → convert OH to good leaving group. H2O departure → carbocation. 2nd ROH attack. Deprotonate ⇒ acetal + acid regenerated. Use as protecting groups for carbonyls (stable to base & many nucleophiles, removed in acid/water). Retrosynthesis Tips Locate carbon bearing two OR groups ⇨ that carbon belonged to original carbonyl. Each OR fragment traces back to an alcohol nucleophile; original electrophile = aldehyde or ketone. For hemiacetals same logic, but one OR, one OH. Nitrogen Nucleophiles (Acid Catalyzed) Only primary & secondary amines react (tertiary lacks N–H for proton transfer). 1. Imines (Schiff Bases) from 1° Amines Ald./Ket. + R N H < e m > 2 → H + C=N–R (Imine) + H < / e m > 2 O \text{Ald./Ket.}+RNH<em>2\xrightarrow{H^+}\text{C=N–R (Imine)} + H</em>2O Ald./Ket. + R N H < e m > 2 H + C=N–R (Imine) + H < / e m > 2 O Steps mirror acetal path (add, proton transfer, eliminate water, deprotonate). Water must appear as by-product; good exam check. 2. Enamines from 2° Amines Ald./Ket. + R < e m > 2 N H → H + Enamine (C=C–NR</em>2) + H 2 O \text{Ald./Ket.}+R<em>2NH\xrightarrow{H^+}\text{Enamine (C=C–NR</em>2)} + H_2O Ald./Ket. + R < e m > 2 N H H + Enamine (C=C–NR</em>2) + H 2 O After water loss, N has no proton ⇒ conjugate base abstracts β-H (resonance-stabilized) → C=C formation. Wittig Reaction (C=O → C=C) Reagents: aldehyde/ketone + phosphorus ylide (phosphorane) . Ylide definition: adjacent P + – C − P^+–C^- P + – C − whose C bears R group(s). Mechanism[2+2] cycloaddition to give 4-membered oxaphosphetane. Collapse → R < e m > 2 C = C R ′ R<em>2C=CR' R < e m > 2 C = C R ′ + O P P h < / e m > 3 OPPh</em>3 O P P h < / e m > 3 . Stereochemistry: E (trans) alkene generally favored. Making the Ylide Step 1 SN2: P P h < e m > 3 + R – X → [ P P h < / e m > 3 R ] + X − PPh<em>3 + R–X \rightarrow [PPh</em>3R]^+X^- P P h < e m > 3 + R – X → [ P P h < / e m > 3 R ] + X − (needs methyl, 1° or allylic halide). Step 2 Base deprotonation (E1cb style): strong base (e.g. n ! BuLi , N a H , K O t B u n!\text{BuLi},\ NaH, KOtBu n ! BuLi , N a H , K O tB u ) abstracts α-H ⇒ ylide (P^+!!–!C^-). Electron-withdrawing groups (e.g. carbonyl, ester) adjacent to carbanion stabilize via resonance, enhancing acidity and ease of ylide formation. Acid Catalysis & Mechanistic Patterns (Across O & N Nucleophiles) First action: protonate carbonyl O. Nucleophile adds once carbonyl is activated. Proton transfers orchestrate conversion of OH to H2O LG and regeneration of catalyst. Loss of H2O → carbocation (SN1) except in hydration/hemiacetal where LG not required. Exam/ACS Strategy Reminders Recognize patterns:Protonated carbonyl → nucleophilic addition. Two OR → acetal; OR + OH → hemiacetal; O- & N-derived analogs distinguished by heteroatom. Phosphorus in reagent list almost always signals Wittig. Count ring atoms when intramolecular nucleophiles present (5 vs 6 membered confusion common). Work backwards : find carbon bearing two heteroatoms to spot original carbonyl for retrosynthesis. By-product cross-checks: H2O in imine/enamine & acetal formation; O P P h 3 OPPh_3 O P P h 3 in Wittig. Oxidation state memory aid: PCC stops at aldehyde; any Cr(VI) aqueous keeps going to acid. Practical/Philosophical Connections Carbohydrate cyclization and anomeric reactivity directly mirror hemiacetal chemistry learned here. Protecting-group logic (acetals) underpins multistep synthesis design and ethical environmental consideration (choose removable protecting groups to lower waste). Wittig’s utility extends to pharma/agrochem where immediate alkene products feed into olefin metathesis or bioactive scaffolds — illustrating how foundational mechanisms scale to real-world innovation.