CHEM 120 Equilibrium Review Problem Set
Equilibrium Problem
- Initial moles: H2 (5.443), Cl2 (7.432), HCl (3.211) in 1.500 L container.
- Equilibrium constant: Kc = 30.5
- Reaction: H<em>2(g)+Cl</em>2(g)⇌2HCl(g)
- Initial concentrations: [H<em>2]=3.629M, [Cl</em>2]=4.955M, [HCl]=2.141M
Reaction Quotient and Direction
- Q=[H<em>2][Cl</em>2][HCl]2=(3.629)(4.955)(2.141)2=0.2549
- Q < K, reaction proceeds to the right (toward products).
ICE Table
- R: H<em>2, Cl</em>2, 2HCl
- I: 3.629, 4.955, 2.141
- C: -x, -x, +2x
- E: 3.629-x, 4.955-x, 2.141+2x
Equilibrium Expression
- K=[H<em>2][Cl</em>2][HCl]2
- 30.5=(3.629−x)(4.955−x)(2.141+2x)2
- 30.5=17.98−8.584x+x24.584+8.564x+4x2
- 4.584+8.564x+4x2=548.39−261.84x+30.5x2
- 26.5x2−270.40x+534.81=0
Solving for x
- Quadratic formula: x=2a−b±b2−4ac
- x=2(26.5)−(−270.40)±(−270.40)2−4(26.5)(534.81)
- x=2.755 and x=7.448
- x = 2.755 (7.448 is not possible due to negative concentration)
Equilibrium Concentrations
- [H2]=3.629−2.755=0.874M
- [Cl2]=4.955−2.755=2.200M
- [HCl]=2.141+2(2.755)=7.651M
Checking the Work
- Q=[H<em>2][Cl</em>2][HCl]2=(0.874)(2.200)(7.651)2=30.444
- Q ≈ K, solution is correct.
Partial Pressures at Equilibrium
- Reaction: C(s)+O<em>2(g)⇌CO</em>2(g)
- ΔGrxno=−394.4molkJ
Calculating Kp
- ΔGo=−RTln(K)
- −394400molJ=−(8.314mol⋅KJ)(298.15K)ln(K)
- ln(K)=−(8.314mol⋅KJ)(298.15K)−394400molJ=159.11
- K=e159.11=1.26×1069=P<em>O</em>2P<em>CO</em>2
Limiting Reactant
- 100.0 g O<em>2×32.00gO<em>21molO</em>2=3.125molO</em>2
- 100.0 g C×12.01gC1molC=8.326molC
- Oxygen is the limiting reactant.
Initial Partial Pressure of Oxygen
- P<em>O</em>2=10.00L(3.125molO2)(0.08206mol⋅KL⋅atm)(298.15K)=7.646atm
- Initially, P<em>CO</em>2=0
Equilibrium Partial Pressures
- 1.26×1069=7.646−xx
- 9.634×1069−1.26×1069x=x
- x=1.26×10699.634×1069=7.65atmCO2
Solving for Partial Pressure of Oxygen
- 1.26×1069=x7.646
- x=1.26×10697.646=6.07×10−69atmO2
Checking the Work
- Q=P<em>O</em>2P<em>CO</em>2=6.07×10−697.646=1.26×1069
- Q = K, so answers are correct.
Weak Acid Equilibrium
- Weak monoprotic acid HA with Ka=1.54×10−7
- 0.10 M solution of HA.
- HA(aq)+H<em>2O(l)⇌A−(aq)+H</em>3O+(aq)
ICE Table
- I: 0.10, 0, 0
- C: -x, +x, +x
- E: 0.10 - x, x, x
Approximation
- Since Ka<10−3 and [HA]>0.05M, neglect x in (0.10 - x).
- K<em>a=[HA][A−][H</em>3O+]=1.54×10−7=0.10(x)(x)
- x2=1.54×10−8
- x=1.24×10−4=[A−]=[H3O+]
pH Calculation
- pH=−log([H3O+])=−log(1.24×10−4)=3.906
Weak Base Equilibrium
- Weak base B with Kb=3.84×10−5
- 0.200 M solution of B.
- B(aq)+H2O(l)⇌BH+(aq)+OH−(aq)
ICE Table
- I: 0.20, 0, 0
- C: -x, +x, +x
- E: 0.20 - x, x, x
Approximation
- Since Kb<10−3 and [B]>0.05M, neglect x in (0.20 - x).
- Kb=[B][BH+][OH−]=3.84×10−5=0.20(x)(x)
- x2=7.68×10−6
- x=2.77×10−3=[BH+]=[OH−]
pOH and pH Calculation
- pOH=−log([OH−])=−log(2.77×10−3)=2.557
- pH=14−pOH=14−2.557=11.443
Solubility of Copper(II) Hydroxide
- Saturated solution of Cu(OH)<em>2, K</em>sp=2.2×10−20
- Cu(OH)2(s)⇌Cu2+(aq)+2OH−(aq)
- Ksp=[Cu2+][OH−]2
Equilibrium Concentrations
- [Cu2+]=x, [OH−]=2x
- Ksp=(x)(2x)2=4x3
- 2.2×10−20=4x3
- x3=5.5×10−21
- x=35.5×10−21=1.77×10−7M
- [Cu2+]=1.77×10−7M, [OH−]=3.53×10−7M
Acetic Acid Buffer
- Acetic acid buffer with pH = 5.00
- Total acetic acid + acetate concentration = 100.0 mM
- pKa=4.74
- CH<em>3COOH(aq)+H</em>2O(l)⇌CH<em>3COO−(aq)+H</em>3O+(aq)
Buffer Equation
- pH=pK<em>a+log([CH3COOH][CH</em>3COO−])
- 5=4.74+log(100−xx)
- 0.26=log(100−xx)
- 100.26=100−xx
- 1.8197=100−xx
- 181.97−1.8197x=x
- 181.97=2.8197x
- x=2.8197181.97=64.5mM[CH3COO−]
- [CH3COOH]=100.0mM−64.5mM=35.5mM
Molar Solubility of Calcium Fluoride
- CaF<em>2(s)⇌Ca2+(aq)+2F−(aq), K</em>sp=3.9×10−11
- Ksp=[Ca2+][F−]2=(x)(2x)2=4x3
- 4x3=3.9×10−11
- x3=9.75×10−12
- x=2.14×10−4M
Molar Solubility in 0.01 M NaF
Ksp=[Ca2+][F−]2=(x)(0.01)2=3.9×10−11
x=3.9×10−7M
The molar solubility decreased by a factor of 549.7.
Molar Solubility of Zinc Phosphate
- Zn<em>3(PO</em>4)<em>2(s)⇌3Zn2+(aq)+2PO</em>43−(aq), Ksp=9.1×10−33
- K<em>sp=[Zn2+]3[PO</em>43−]2=(3x)3(2x)2=108x5
- 108x5=9.1×10−33
- x5=8.4×10−35
- x=1.53×10−7M
Equilibrium Constant Calculation
- Zn2+(aq)+4CN−(aq)⇌Zn(CN)42−
- Zn<em>3(PO</em>4)<em>2(s)⇌3Zn2+(aq)+2PO</em>43−(aq)
- Zn<em>3(PO</em>4)<em>2(s)+12CN−(aq)⇌3Zn(CN)</em>42−(aq)+2PO43−(aq)
- K=K<em>f3×K</em>sp=(5.0×1011)3×9.1×10−33=1.14×101
Molar Solubility of Nickel Cyanide
- Ni(CN)<em>2(s)⇌Ni2+(aq)+2CN−(aq), K</em>sp=3×10−11
- Ni2+(aq)+6NH<em>3(aq)⇌Ni(NH</em>3)<em>62+(aq), K</em>f=2×108
- Ni(CN)<em>2(s)+6NH</em>3(aq)⇌Ni(NH<em>3)</em>62+(aq)+2CN−(aq)
- K=K<em>sp×K</em>f=(3×10−11)(2×108)=6×10−3
- K=[NH3]6[Ni(NH<em>3)</em>62+][CN−]2=(1.00)6(x)(2x)2
- 6×10−3=4x3
- x=0.114M
Isomerization of Ethanal to Vinyl Alcohol
- CH<em>3C(O)H⇌H</em>2CCHOH
- ΔG∘=−127.6molkJ for ethanal, ΔG∘=−83.02molkJ for vinyl alcohol.
- ΔGrxn∘=(1mol×−83.02molkJ)−(1mol×−127.6molkJ)=44.58molkJ
Equilibrium Constant Calculation
- ΔG=−RTlnK
- lnK=−RTΔG
- lnK=−8.314mol⋅KJ×298K44.58molkJ×10001kJJ=−18.01
- K=e−18.01=1.48×10−8