Judiciary
Superior judges - supreme, appeal, high
Constitutional Reform Act 2005 - established the supreme court, meaning that judges were separate from parliament which created an independent judiciary
Inferior judges - crown, magistrates, county
Role
Preside over both civil (decide the issue of liability & the amount of damages to be awarded) & criminal (decide the sentence & jury decide the verdict) cases
s2 ECHR - must take into account decisions made by the ECtHR, but are not bound
s3 ECHR - as far as it’s possible to do so judges must interpret legislation in a way that upholds the convention rights
Training
Carried out by the Judicial College
3 elements:
Knowledge of substantive law evidence, procedure
The acquisition & improvement of judicial skills
The social context within which judging occurs
First appointment - go through an introduction programme & will be assigned a mentor who is an experienced judge
Continue their professional development through the completion of seminars & e-learning to keep up to date with developments of legislation & procedure
Constitutional Reform Act 2005 - judicial posts are advertised & candidates must apply
Recruitment of judges is now managed by judicial Appointments Commission - completely separate from the political influence of the gov
Qualities recommended by the JAC for a good judge:
Intellectual capacity
Integrity, independence of mind, decisiveness, objectivity, willingness to learn
Ability to understand & deal fairly
Efficiency
Appointments are now made solely on merit, the amount of time a candidate has to have worked in law has been reduced to increase the pool of potential candidates & encourage applications from solicitors, barristers, tribunal judges
Retirement
Usually retire at 70
Superior judges have security of tenure - they should not be at risk of removal just because the gov may not agree with their decisions can be dismissed due to misbehaviour or inability/disciplinary reasons, they may also be under pressure to resign if their behaviour is unwarranted
e.g. Judge Peter Bowers refused to jail a pedophile for accessing images of child abuse in 2013, saying ‘he’d have a hard time in prison’
Dismissal - can be dismissed due to misbehaviour or inability/disciplinary reasons, they may also be under pressure to resign if their behaviour is unwarranted
~ Lord Chancellor - can dismiss inferior judges with consent of the Lord Chief Justice for misbehaviour or incapacity
~ The King - can remove senior judges when given a petition from both houses of parliament
Judges cannot be prosecuted or sued for anything they do in exercise of their judicial role - Sirros v Moore
Separation of powers
s3 Constitutional Reform Act 2005 - guarantees judicial independence & states this must be upheld at all times
Judges are free from influence from the legislature & gov, they can make decisions which may displease the gov without threat of dismissal, must be free from political bias
To ensure D gets a fair trial judges cannot have any political bias & influence from the legislature
Judges also hear applications for judicial review of gov decision making & strike down legislation that is ultra vires - requires a judge not to be afraid to find against the gov
Representation of judges
Female judges
44% of all judges (underrepresented in senior roles)
57% of magistrates
41% of barristers
54% of solicitors
78% of chartered legal executives
Ethnic minorities
13% of all judges (Underrepresented in senior roles)
17% of barristers
19% of solicitors
12% of chartered legal executives
Age
68% of all judges are 50 & over
6% aged 70 & over
41% of barristers
31% of solicitors
39% of chartered legal executives
72% of new appointees are under 50
Judges tend to be older within senior roles due to their experience