Prostho Veneer Restorations and Radicular Retained Restorations
Fixed Prosthodontics Restoration
PFM (Porcelain Fused to Metal Crown)
All Ceramic Crown (aka Porcelain Crown, Ceramic Crown)
Metal Crown (aka Stainless Steel Crown, Shell Crown)
Partial Veneer Restoration
Three-quarter crown
Pin modified three-quarter crown
Seven-eighths crown
Porcelain laminate veneer
Proximal half crown
Intracoronal Restorations
Inlays
Onlays
Radicular Retained Restorations
Dowel Post and Core
Pre-fabricated Post and Core
COMPLETE VENEER RESTORATIONS
PFM
Widely used
Consist of: complete coverage cast metal crown, layed fused porcelain
Least conservative
Indications
Esthetics
Porcelain crown contraindicated
Gingival involvement
Contraindications
Large pulp chamber
Intact buccal wall
Feasible more conservative retainer
Advantage
Superior esthetics
Disadvantages
Removal of substantial amount of tooth structure
Subject to fracture (porcelain brittleness)
Difficulty to obtain accurate occlusion
Difficult shade selection
Inferior esthetics vs porcelain crown
All Ceramic Crown
Most esthetically pleasing
Resembles natural tooth structure better
Susceptible to fracture
Fabrication Techniques
Platinum Foil Matrix Technique - old technique, adapted to die
Direct Firing - associated with previous tech., die is removed through air abrasion
Lost Wax - most recent technique
Historical Background of Crowns and Inlays
C.H. Land - first ceramic crowns and inlays (1886), platinum foil matrix (1887)
Acrylic Resin in 1940s, causing ceramic restorations to decline in popularity until disadvantage of resin materials was realized
Vacuum firing was introduced, improving the appearance of the ceramic restoration. More dense and translucent restoration is achieved, impossible for airfiring.
Introduction of High Strength Porcelains
Developed due to incidence of fracture in old ceramic restorations.
Two paths:
Two ceramic materials to fabricate the restoration (high strength, non-esthetic core + low strength, esthetic ceramic)
Ceramic materials that combine good esthetics with high strength ceramics
High Strength Ceramic Core
Introduced in Dentistry by McLean and Hughes (1965)
Glass-alumina composite is used instead of feldspar
Fused aluminum oxide particles are much stronger, acting as a constraint model
Indications
High esthetics
Proximal caries
Intact incisal edge
Endodontically treated (w/ post and core)
Favorable distribution of occlusal load
Contraindication of High Strength Ceramic Core
Superior strength is warranted
Significant caries with sufficient coronal tooth structure
Thin teeth faciolingually
Unfavorable distribution of occlusal load
Advantages
Esthetics unsurpassed
Good tissue response
Conservative of facial wall
Disadvantages
Reduced strength (vs PFM)
Proper preparation EXTREMELY CRITICAL
Among least conservative restoration
Brittle
Single restoration only
Complete Cast Crown
Badly damaged posterior teeth
Single tooth or as a retainer
Adequate tooth structure removal to allow restoration to its original contour
Reduction should be sufficient to produce acceptable strength
Advantages
Greater retention and resistance (vs partial veneer crown)
Superior strength
Can modify the axial tooth contour (dealing with malaligned teeth)
Allows modification for proper placement of survey lines, guide planes, and occlusal rests
Easy modification of the occlusion on supraerupted teeth
Disadvantages
Extensive reduction of the occlusal
Common incidence of inflammation of gingiva
Electric vitality test no longer feasible
Objections to display of metal
Indicators
Extensive coronal destruction
Maximum retention and resistance OR high displacement force is anticipated
Support a removable partial denture
Endodontically treated teeth
Contraindications
More conservative restoration
Need for high esthetics
PARTIAL VENEER RESTORATIONS
Partial Veneer Crown (POSTERIOR)
Indication
Sturdy clinical crown of average length OR longer
Intact buccal surface not in need of contour modification
No conflict between axial relationship of tooth and proposed path of withdrawal
Contraindications
Short teeth
High caries index
Poor alignment
Bulbous teeth
Thin teeth
Advantages
Conservative of tooth preparation
Easy access to margins for finishing (dentist), for cleaning (patient)
Less gingival involvement than with complete cast crown
Easy escape of cement and good seating
Easy verification of seating simple
Electric vitality test feasible
Disadvantages
Slightly less retentive than complete cast crown
Limited adjustment of path of withdrawal
Some display of metal
Partial Veneer Crown (ANTERIOR)
Indication
Same as posterior PVC
Contraindication
Same as posterior, additional:
Nonvital teeth
Extensive destruction
Cervical caries
Advantages
Same as posterior
Disadvantages
Same as posterior, additional:
Non-indicated on non-vital teeth
Porcelain Laminate Veneer
History
1983 - introduction
Combined esthetics and positive tissue response of porcelain with adhesive strength of acid etched retained restoration
Acid Etching
Retention is accomplished by creation of microporosites in the porcelain and enamel
Treated with 10% acid solution (hydrofluoric acid)
Normally used phosphoric acid
Silane Coupling Agent
Function: alter the surface of a solid, increase the shear strength of porcelain-composite resin bond
Composite Resin Luting Cements
Auto-curing composite resins retain laminate veneers
This kind of luting cement increases working time
Advantages
Excellent esthetics
Excellent long term durability
Inherent porcelain strength
Marginal integrity
Soft tissue compatibility
Minimal tooth reduction
Disadvantages
Time
Cost
Fragility
Lack of repairability
Difficulty in color matching
Irreversibility
Inability to trial cement the restoration
Indications
Correcting diastemata
Exception: anything more than 2 mm of diastema causes the PV to be unsupported
Masking discolored or stained teeth
Masking enamel defects
Correcting misaligned or malformed teeth
Contraindications
Bruxism
Short teeth
Insufficient or inadequate enamel
Large restoration OR endodontically treated teeth
Oral habits causing excessive stress on restoration
GINGIVAL FINISHING LINES
Chamfer - preferred for all gingival finishing lines.
Supragingival finishing lines - same advantages as proximal finishing lines
Impressions are easier to make
Major disadvantage - visible staining or color changes
INCISAL PREPARATION
1 mm of porcelain thickness
Only 0.5 mm of incisal reduction is required if incisocervical of restoration is 0.5 mm longer than existing tooth.
Only rounding off of incisal edge is required if preoperative teeth are to be lengthened by 1 mm.
Finishing line should slope slightly gingival approximately 75 degrees from the labial.
LABIAL DEPTH REDUCTION
0.5-0.7 mm - maxillary teeth
0.3 mm for smaller teeth (mandibular incisors)
Instrument: three-tiered depth cutter;
To not overproduce and affect the dentinal portion
INLAYS
Walls diverge occlusally
Class I Inlay
Occlusal bevel - provides marginal integrity
Wall - provides retention and resistance
Pulpal floor - provides resistance
Class II Inlay
Gingival bevel - marginal integrity
Proximal box - retention, resistance; structural durability
Proximal flare - marginal integrity
Isthmus - retention and resistance, structural durability
Dovetail - retention and resistance, structural durability
Occlusal bevel - marginal integrity
Class III Inlay
Proximal box - retention and resistance, structural durability
Dovetail - retention and resistance
Facial bevel - marginal integrity
Proximal flare - marginal integrity
Isthmus - retention and resistance
Lingual bevel - marginal integrity
Class V Inlay
Pinholes - retention and resistance
Peripheral wall -retention and resistance
Bevel - marginal integrity
Onlay
Class II MOD
Involves the tip of the cusp
Gingival bevel, occlusal lingual bevel, occlusal facial bevel, proximal flare - marginal integrity
Proximal box, Isthmus - retention and resistance, structural durability
Planar occlusal reduction, Functional cusp bevel, occlusal shoulder - structural durability
Radicular Retained Restoration
Treatment Planning
Extensive caries or periodontal disease make removal of teeth more sensible than endodontically treating it.
Orthodontic repositioning or root resection may also restore it.
This should be done if its loss will significantly jeopardize the patient’s occlusal function.
Inspection
Assessment of a tooth for endodontic treatment:
Good apical seal
No sensitivity to pressure
No exudate
No fistula
No apical sensitivity
No active inflammation
Considerations
Endodontically treated teeth are believed to be weaker than the vital teeth.
Metal post replaces the root canal filling to strengthen it.
Disadvantages
Placing a post needs additional operative procedure
Preparing the tooth to accommodate the post needs removal of additional tooth structure
Difficulty of restoration of the tooth later (post may have failed to provide adequate retention)
Complicates or prevents future endodontic retreatment
Considerations (for posterior teeth)
Endodontically treated posterior teeth are subject to greater loading.
They are positioned closer to the insertion of the masticatory muscles, combined with morphologic characteristics.
Complete coverage is recommended with a high risk of fracture.
Best protection as the tooth is encircled by the restoration.
Types
Dowel post and core (custom)
Prefabricated post
Classification of prefabricated posts
Tapered smooth sided post
Tapered serrated post
Tapered threaded post
Parallel smooth sided
Parallel serrated post
Parallel threaded post
Principles of Tooth Preparation
Conservation of Tooth Structure
Root canal - creates a post space, minimal tooth structure removal; over enlargement of removal may perforate or weaken then split the tooth during cementation of the post.
Coronal tissue - lost from caries, previous restorations or preparation for endodontic access cavity; further reduction is needed for cast core; amount of remaining tooth structure is probably the single most important predictor of clinical success
Six Features of a Successful Design Preparation
Adequate apical seal
Minimum canal enlargement
Adequate post length
Positive horizontal stop
Vertical wall
Extension of the final restoration onto the sound tooth structure
Retention Form
Anterior teeth - affected by preparation geometry, post length, diameter, surface texture, luting agent; long posts with circular cross section for good retention and support
Posterior teeth - has curved roots and elliptical ribbon shaped canals, short posts on divergent canals for better retention
Retention of a post is affected by the following:
Preparation geometry - nearly circular cross section, canal with elliptical cross sections to ensure adequate retention and eliminate undesired undercuts
Post length - post length increases, retention increases; short post will fail, long post can damage apical seal OR cause root perforation
Post diameter - increasing diameter is not recommended
Post surface texture - serrated OR roughened post is more retentive
Luting agent - has little effect on post retention
Zinc phosphate and GI have similar renentive properties
Polycarboxylate and composite resin - less
May be important if post has poor fit within the canal.
Three Stage Operation for a Post and Core Preparation (Direct Method)
Canal preparation
Acrylic Pattern Fabrication
Finish and Cementation of Dowel Core
Canal Preparation
Round bur - used to remove caries, bases, and previous restorations
Prepare teeth for a complete restoration
Not necessary to remove all supragingival coronal tooth structure
Removal of endodontic filling material:
Warmed endodontic plugger
Rotary instrument
Make the post length equal to the height of the anatomic crown (or two-thirds the length of root).
Leave some of the gutta percha on the apex (master apical cone) that provides an apical seal
Preparation of keyway
No. 170 bur - key way at the occlusal where there is the greatest bulk
Keyway should cut to the diameter of the bur approx. 1mm
Keyway should cut to the length of the cutting blades of the bur approx 4mm
Placing contra-bevel
Prominent contra bevel around the occlusal external periphery of the preparation with a flame diamond
Provides a gold collar around the occlusal circumference of the preparation
Retention and prevention of fracture (resistance)
Safeguard on a precision fitting dowel (tendency to exert lateral force when cemented)
Acrylic Pattern Fabrication
Sprue fitted into the canal
14 gauge solid plastic sprue OR matchstick
Cut a small notch on the facial portion of the occlusal end of the plastic sprue; to aid in orienting the dowel core pattern
Mix acrylic resin monomer and polymer to a runny consistency
Lubricate the canal with a petrolatum on a small piece of cotton on the reamer
Fill the mouth of the canal as full as possible with acrylic resin
Coat the plastic sprue with monomer
Completely seated in the canal
Make sure that the external bevel is covered
Pump the pattern in and out when acrylic resin has initial set to prevent locking into any undercuts
Relubricate the canal and reseat the acrylic post after polymerization
Make a second mix of acrylic resin, place it around the exposed plastic sprue
Coronal portion can be molded on the labial and lingual during the curing of the acrylic
Acrylic core is shaped following the outline form of a jacket preparation.
No roughness or undercuts.
Finished acrylic pattern should be smoothened.
Cementation of Dowel Core
Luting agent should fill all dead space.
Voids may cause for periodontal inflammation via laterla canals.
Rotary past filler (or cement tube) is used to fill the canal with cement.
Post and core is inserted gently to reduce hydrostatic pressure, may cause root fracture
Groove should be placed along the side post to allow excess cement to escape (if a parallel side post is being used)
Location of Dowel Core for Posterior Teeth
Maxillary premolars with two canals utilize the buccal canal for most of its restoration
Maxillary molars utilize the palatal canal for retention
Mandibular molars utilize the distal canal