Cuneiform and the Decipherment – Quick Reference

Cuneiform: Overview

  • Not a language; a writing system (like hieroglyphs) invented by the Sumerians. Used across Mesopotamia by many groups

  • Variants include: Sumero–Akkadian cuneiform, Ugaritic cuneiform, Old Persian cuneiform. Visually similar but not identical across languages.

Cuneiform: Script Type and Varieties

  • Usually not a true alphabet; it is a syllabary.

    • Signs encode consonant+vowel combinations (e.g., /ba-/, /mu-/, /se-/) rather than single consonants like /b/ or /m/.

    • Total signs are hundreds; a few vowel-only signs exist.

  • Ugaritic cuneiform and Old Persian cuneiform are later simplifications toward alphabet-like systems.

  • Basic wedge-strokes: horizontal, vertical, downward diagonal, upward diagonal, angular hook (Winkelhaken).

  • Typical sign uses 5–10 wedge strokes; each syllabic sign is a unique combination of strokes.

History of Development

  • Original Sumerian writing system developed around 3300 B.C.E.3300\ \mathrm{B.C.E.}; partly pictographic at first.

  • Used for inventory and administration; gradually became the true cuneiform form by around 3000 B.C.E.3000\ \mathrm{B.C.E.} to 2900 B.C.E.2900\ \mathrm{B.C.E.}.

  • Adoption by Semitic-speaking Akkadians made it more abstract and less pictographic.

Tablet-Writing and Medium

  • Writing medium: clay tablets pressed with a sharpened reed to produce wedge marks (hence "cuneiform">).

  • Tablets recorded in horizontal lines; read left-to-right.

  • Tablets could be erased when still wet; baked to preserve when important; extremely durable after baking.

  • Papyrus was not used in Mesopotamia; tablets were the standard medium.

Daily Life and Literacy

  • No public schooling; literacy was low among ordinary people.

  • Cylinder seals provided a key literacy/administrative function: personal signatures and contracts on clay tablets.

  • Cylinder seals were portable, status symbols, and widely used across Mesopotamian societies.

Cylinder Seals: Function and Significance

  • Cylinders bore carved motifs and/or writing; rolled over damp clay to leave an impression.

  • Used in contracts, approvals, and signings; often kept as heirlooms or worn as jewelry.

  • They are among the most common finds in Mesopotamian archaeology.

Reading and Complexities of Cuneiform

  • Many languages used the same cuneiform script; the dominant surviving texts are in Akkadian ( Babylonian dialect ), with Sumerian texts also present.

  • Many Sumerian words were inserted into Akkadian sentences (logograms), complicating reading and translation.

  • Languages of Mesopotamia were Afro-Asiatic (Semitic) and other families; most speakers used Akkadian (Assyrian, Babylonian dialects) or Sumerian.

  • Akkadian splits into two main dialects: Assyrian and Babylonian.

  • Syllabaries allow multiple spellings for the same word (e.g., CV, VC, CVC patterns) and sometimes a single-vowel sign.

  • Example pattern: the infinitive šakānum could be written in several ways (6 listed spellings in typical teaching examples), illustrating spelling variation.

The Decipherment of Cuneiform

  • The decipherment problem paralleled the decipherment of hieroglyphs but followed its own path.

  • Old Persian cuneiform is nearly purely alphabetic (about 51 signs), which helped anchor decipherment.

  • Mount Behistun (Behistun Inscription) played a crucial role: a trilingual text in Old Persian, Babylonian (Akkadian), and Elamite.

  • Key figures and milestones:

    • Carsten Niebuhr (1767): accurate sketches of Behistun inscriptions.

    • Eugène Burnouf: published notes that aided reading the Old Persian portion.

    • Henry Rawlinson (early 1840s–1849): copied, transliterated, and translated the Old Persian portion; used his knowledge of Avestan and Vedic languages.

    • By 1838 Rawlinson began translating Old Persian; 1847–1849 published his translations.

    • The Behistun inscriptions allowed decoding of other languages (Babylonian/Akkadian and Elamite) similarly to how the Rosetta Stone aided decipherment of hieroglyphs.

  • Royal Asiatic Society meeting in 1857\ : a public comparison of translations by Rawlinson, Hincks, Oppert, and Talbot showed near-identical results on a newly discovered prism (Tiglath-Pileser I), proving the decipherment work.

  • Outcomes:

    • By mid-19th century, a functional decipherment of Sumero-Akkadian cuneiform allowed translation of thousands of texts.

    • Old Persian, Babylonian (Akkadian), and Elamite texts could be read and compared, enabling broader understanding of Mesopotamian history.

The Behistun Inscription (Key Case)

  • A trilingual inscription (Old Persian, Babylonian, Elamite) on a rock face in western Persia.

  • The Old Persian portion provided a phonetic framework; Babylonian (Akkadian) and Elamite provided cross-checks.

  • The inscription helped identify place-names (satrapies) and royal names (e.g., Darius, Xerxes).

  • The discovery and decipherment process established a method for reading previously unknown cuneiform languages.

The Epic of Gilgamesh and Mesopotamian Literature

  • There are many genres in Mesopotamian literature: myth, epic, ritual texts, divination, letters, royal inscriptions, annals, treaties, law, hymns, wisdom literature, prophecy, autobiographies, archives, and more.

  • The Epic of Gilgamesh is not a single, fixed, classical epic; it is a compilation of episodes written at different times by different authors and later stitched together.

  • The epic is often shown as a hallmark of Mesopotamian literature, but its manuscript tradition is highly varied across tablets.

  • Related flood/myth cycles: Sumerian Flood story (The Epic of Ziusudra), Atrahasis, and parallels in Genesis.

  • The idea of the Gilgamesh epic as a single masterwork is tied to later interpretive movements (e.g., Pan-Babylonianism) that argued Near Eastern cultures were uniformly superior to later Israelite/Greek/Roman works.

Notable Individuals and Terms

  • Sir Henry Rawlinson: key figure in decipherment; often called the "Father of modern Assyriology".

  • Other contributeors: Eugène Burnouf; Edward Hincks; Botta; Layard; A.L. Oppert; Talbot; Norris.

  • The Decipherment enabled modern archaeology and historical linguistics in the ancient Near East.

Quick Reference Dates (selected)

  • Sumerian origin of writing: 3300 B.C.E.3300\ \mathrm{B.C.E.}

  • True cuneiform by: 3000 B.C.E.3000\ \mathrm{B.C.E.}2900 B.C.E.2900\ \mathrm{B.C.E.}

  • Old Persian cuneiform steps toward alphabeticity: 18th–19th centuries CE ( decipherment processes in the 1700s–1800s )

  • Niebuhr’s Persepolis work: 17671767 CE

  • Burnouf’s and Rawlinson’s work influencing decipherment: mid- to late-19th century

  • Royal Asiatic Society decipherment meeting: 18571857 CE

Core Takeaways

  • Cuneiform is a writing system used for multiple languages, not a single language.

  • It began as Sumerian and evolved through Akkadian influence; variants include Ugaritic and Old Persian.

  • It is typically a syllabary with hundreds of signs, not a simple alphabet.

  • Tablets and cylinder seals were central to administration, economy, and daily life; most texts are Akkadian, with Sumerian words inserted as logograms.

  • The Behistun Inscription was pivotal to deciphering cuneiform, analogous to the Rosetta Stone for hieroglyphs.

  • Gilgamesh is a composite of episodes; Mesopotamian literature spans many genres and reflects a rich, diverse literary culture.