Lecture 10 Speech Perception A
Unit: Sound & Sign - The Building Blocks of Language
Linguistics 111 - Speech Perception A + Class 11
Announcements
Housekeeping:
RQ8 was due before class.
D07 worksheet due on Friday by 11:59pm ET.
Peer Feedback/Reflection and Outline Resubmission due on Friday by 11:59pm ET.
No Class on Monday - Fall Study Break.
No RQ for next Wednesday.
Practice Exam due next Wednesday.
iClicker Check: Interaction of Sounds
Sounds adjacent to each other influence each other to ease pronunciation and perception.
**Key Concepts: **
Assimilation: A sound becomes more like a neighboring sound.
Dissimilation: Sounds become less similar to each other.
Epenthesis: Insertion of a sound within a word.
Metathesis: Reordering of sounds.
Strengthening: Reinforcement of a sound.
Deletion: Omission of a sound.
Weakening: Reduction in sound intensity or clarity.
iClicker Check: Vowel Systems
Consideration of which three vowels might exist in a limited vowel inventory and the importance of central sounds in a vowel triangle system.
Triangle System: Central vowels are distinct in articulation, promoting diversity in sound.
Languages with only three vowels are likely to incorporate these core sounds.
Recap: Importance of Studying Language
Mind Creates Language:
Language exists in the mind where sounds translate to meaning.
Linguistics employs scientific methods to analyze the mental structures of language.
Language Shapes Society:
Language helps establish social connections and individual identity.
Diversity in Language:
All varieties of language are valid, promoting justice against linguistic discrimination.
Recap: How We Study Language
Hierarchy of Language Structure:
SOUNDS/SIGNS → SENTENCES → MORPHEMES/WORDS → MEANING.
Sound and Sign: Key Areas of Study
Phonetics:
Study of the physical properties of speech sounds and how they are produced and perceived.
Use of the International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA) to represent sounds.
Understanding articulatory phonetic properties of consonants and vowels.
Analysis of both pulmonic (air from lungs) and non-pulmonic (other sources) consonants.
Discussion of five parameters in sign languages.
Phonology:
Focus on the distribution of sounds within languages and their interactions.
Distinction between phonemes (distinct sound units) and allophones (contextual variations of phonemes).
Formulation of phonological rules and generalizations.
Examination of common cross-linguistic phonological processes.
Recognition of phonotactic constraints affecting syllable structure.
Speech Perception:
Examination of how sounds are heard, interpreted, and understood.
Primary focus on:
Lack of Invariance Problem: Variations in acoustic properties challenge perception accuracy.
Categorical Perception: The process where continuous sound inputs are perceived in discrete categories.
Perceptual Narrowing: The process of becoming attuned to specific phonetic contrasts based on linguistic exposure.
Lack of Invariance Problem
Definition: The inconsistency in sound manifestation, where identical phonemes appear acoustically or articulatory different yet are perceived as the same.
Example with nonce-words 3[ada], [idi], [udu]: Even with different contexts, speakers perceive /d/ consistently.
Articulatory Overlap: Overlaps between phonetic realizations of surrounding vowels and consonants that can confuse perception.
Coarticulation demonstrates this phenomenon, showing how surrounding phonemes influence articulation and perception.
Categorical Perception
Definition: The cognitive process by which continuous variations in sound are categorized by the listener.
Example: Different sounds presented sequentially lead to a categorical perception boundary.
Illustrates the brain's ability to impose structured categories over a continuum of sound, leading to perception of distinct phonetic sounds (e.g., [pa] vs. [ba]).
Voice Onset Time (VOT): Measures time between release of stop consonant and onset of vocal cord vibration; critical in differentiating voiced and voiceless stops.
Consonants with lower VOT:** perceived as more voiced (/b/).
Consonants with higher VOT:** perceived as more voiceless (/p/).
Categorical Perception in Practice
Experiments demonstrate categorical perception using VOT. Listeners identify whether they perceive [pa] or [ba] based on slight manipulations of VOT.
Graphical representation of shifts in perception as VOT changes emphasizes categorical perception versus continuous input.
Distinction in Perception: Listeners demonstrate a clear boundary in their perceptions, indicating that linguistic categories influence interpretation of sounds.
Categorical Perception and Its Boundaries Across Languages
Each language enacts its unique phonological system, leading to different perception boundaries.
Example: English and Hindi exhibit different responses to aspiration in stops.
Categorical boundaries exist uniquely patterned by language, indicating that language shapes cognitive processing of sounds.
Categorical Perception in Sign Language
Similar mechanisms in sign perception. Research shows that ASL signers demonstrate categorical perceptions in perceiving hand shapes, mirroring spoken language mechanisms.
Studies conducted by Baker et al. (2005) highlight the significance of gesture parameters and participant familiarity with sign language affecting categorization.
Results indicate ASL signers outperform non-signers in tasks straddling the categorical boundary, confirming categorical perception within the realm of sign language.
Conclusions on Perception
As infants, we are capable of distinguishing between language sounds from birth but narrow this ability based on exposure.
Perceptual Narrowing: Developmental change observed where infants become proficient in their language contrasts while failing to recognize non-native sounds.
Age milestones (0mo, 6-8mo, 10-12mo) indicate decreasing differentiation of non-native contrasts.
Overall Implications of the Studies
Cognitive processing of language emerges as a complex interplay of acoustics and mental categorization, encompassing speech and sign languages.
Recognition of inherent linguistic structures validates all forms of communication, challenging discrimination based on variation in language use.