Lecture 17: Groups
From Person to People: Group Behavior
What Is Group Behavior?
Group behavior studies how being part of a group influences individuals' actions, decisions, and attitudes.
Key Questions:
How do groups affect our behavior toward others?
How quickly do we form impressions of others?
How do stereotypes influence our behavior?
The Bystander Effect
Definition: The tendency for individuals to be less likely to help in an emergency when others are present.
Key Study: Darley & Latané (1968)
Participants overheard someone having a seizure.
Results:
In small groups (2 people): ~100% helped.
In large groups (6 people): ~50% helped.
Why?: Diffusion of responsibility—people assume someone else will take action.
Example: Kitty Genovese Case
Kitty Genovese’s murder in 1964 is often cited as an example of the bystander effect.
Reports claimed many witnesses failed to intervene, assuming others would.
Group Membership and Bias
Why Do We Join Groups?
Groups provide a sense of belonging and shared identity (e.g., same place, religion, or interests).
Henri Tajfel’s Minimal Group Paradigm:
Even arbitrary group assignments (e.g., based on counting dots) lead to in-group favoritism and out-group bias:
In-group: More resources and points are given to members of one’s own group.
Out-group: Resources are withheld, and failures are celebrated.
Categorization:
Purpose: Helps make decisions efficiently by organizing information into categories.
Drawbacks:
Leads to stereotyping and snap judgments.
Example: Assigning traits based on group membership rather than investigation.
Thin Slicing:
Definition: Making quick judgments about others based on limited information.
Nalini Ambady’s Research:
Judgments formed in 6 seconds can predict traits like talkativeness, political views, or honesty.
Accuracy vs. Stickiness:
Judgments can be accurate but are often resistant to change (stickiness).
Can lead to self-fulfilling prophecies (e.g., treating someone as dishonest makes them act dishonestly).
Implicit vs. Explicit Bias
Implicit Bias:
Definition: Unconscious biases that influence behavior and decisions without the person’s awareness.
Examples:
Hurricane Katrina: Media portrayed young Black men as looters and white couples as survivors despite similar actions.
Implicit Association Test (IAT): Measures subconscious associations between concepts (e.g., race and good/bad).
Common topics: Race, age, sexuality, weight, disability, gender roles.
Explicit Bias:
Definition: Conscious biases that individuals are aware of and can express verbally.
Examples:
Hiring biases: Studies show racial preferences in hiring, especially for candidates with moderate qualifications.
Dark Side of Groups
The Prisoner’s Dilemma
A game theory scenario where two individuals must choose between cooperation or betrayal.
Outcomes:
Both cooperate: Moderate reward (e.g., both get 2 years in prison).
One betrays, the other cooperates: Betrayer benefits (e.g., 1 year), cooperator suffers (e.g., 10 years).
Both betray: Mutual punishment (e.g., 6 years each).
Iterated Prisoner’s Dilemma:
Repeated interactions encourage cooperation over time.
Strategies:
Copycat: Mirror the other’s behavior.
Copykitten: Forgive occasional betrayals but punish repeated ones.
It pays to be nice when reputation matters.
Ultimatum Game:
Setup:
A proposer offers a split of $10.
The responder can accept (both get money) or reject (neither gets money).
Purpose: Tests generosity and fairness.
Public Goods Game:
Setup:
Participants contribute to a shared pot, which is multiplied and redistributed.
Individuals must decide between personal gain (free-riding) or contributing for group benefit.
Finding:
Time pressure leads to more generosity (fast decisions are often kind).
Group Bias and Stereotypes
Group bias combines categorization, snap judgments, and implicit bias, amplifying stereotypes.
Payne (2001) Study:
Participants identified objects as guns or tools faster when they matched racial stereotypes (e.g., Black prime = gun).
Light Side of Groups
Groups can achieve things individuals cannot, fostering cooperation and generosity.
Key Insights:
Groups can amplify biases but also encourage collaboration under the right conditions.
Spontaneous decisions often reflect our better nature, while calculated ones may lean toward self-interest.