External factors that affect education
Material deprivation
Lack of physical and financial resources needed for success
Examples-
Poor housing (overcrowding, damp)
Inadequate diet and health
Lack of access to resources (Books, internet, tutors)
Less money for transport/ uniform and trips
Impact-
Higher absence rates
Poor concentration and health
Less support for homework/ revision
Cultural deprivation
Language-
Bernstein
Restricted code- Used more by working class (Informal, limited vocabulary)
Elaborated code- Used in education (formal, complex speech)- benefits middle class students
Parental attitudes-
Working class parents may-
Place less value on education
Be less confident dealing with schools
Attend fewer parents evenings
Douglas- Parental interest is a key factor in achievement
Habitus (Bourdieu)-
Middle class families provide cultural capital
Knowledge, tastes, ways of speaking and behaving that match the schools expectations
Cultural capital (Bourdieu)-
Cultural capital- Skills, knowledge, attitudes passed on by middle-class families
Economic capital- Money and recourses
Educational capital- Ability to use both to do well in school
MC students often have all three
Parents education
Educated parents-
Use more challenging speech and reasoning
Read more to their children
Know how to deal with school/systems
Feinstein- Parental education is the most important factor in a child’s achievement
Working class subcultures (Sugarman)-
Values passed down that may hinder success-
Fatalism- Belief that fate determines success
Immediate Gratification- Preferring short term reward
Collectivism- Valuing group over individual success
Present-time orientation- little planning for the future
Impact on social class, Gender and Ethnicity
Class- Working class students face more material and cultural disadvantages
Ethnicity- Some minority groups face-language barriers or less parental knowledge of the system
Gender- External influences like changing job markets or gender role socialisation also matter (see gender-specific revision for more)
Bernstein’s study
Explores how language use in different social classes affects educational achievement
Schools operate using the elaborated code (in teaching, textbooks)- Therefore, middle class students are at an advantage and WC students may struggle leading to lower achievement
Bourdieu’s study
Studied how the middle class maintain their advantage in education to reproduce class inequality
Found MC students understand education and can convert cultural capital into success and WC students feel out of place and may lack the knowledge and confidence to succeed
Douglas study
Studied how home background affects educational achievement, with focus on parental interest
Found that cultural deprivation (lack of support. books) limits working-class children’s progress and MC families pass on values and attitudes that help children to succeed
Feinsteins study
Studied how parents own education levels affect their children’s cognitive development and educational achievement
Found that parental education shapes how children are raised and children from better-educated homes are more school ready-and likely to succeed long term
Sugarmans study
Studied how working class values and attitudes contribute to lower educational achievement
Found that these values can limit aspiration, reduce motivation to study and discourage long-term educational planning and MC are more likely to develop behaviour aligned with school expectations