Identifying Author Claims and Arguments
The Relationship Between Arguments and Claims
- An argument represents the "mountain," or the overarching big idea of an entire piece of writing.
- A claim is a "marker" or a small, specific aspect of the larger argument that an author processes with the reader.
- Breaking down a large, academically critical reading into small claims prevents the brain from becoming overwhelmed and helps build a clearer understanding of the whole piece.
Case Study: Writing as a Profession
- Overarching Argument: Writing professionally is difficult and requires a commitment to time, multiple revisions, and rejection.
- Supporting Claim: A writer must continue to produce work even when they are not finding success.
- To support the overall argument, the specific claim regarding continued effort correlates directly with the "commitment to rejection" mentioned in the main thesis.
Identifying Effective Textual Evidence
- Close reading involves distinguishing between explicit, directly connected paragraphs and those that are merely transitional or supplemental.
- When identifying which paragraph best illustrates a claim, it is necessary to find the section where the fullness of the concept is established.
- Effectiveness is determined by how many components of the claim are present; for example, a paragraph mentioning both the inability to stop and the presence of "doubts" is more thorough than a paragraph that only mentions "doubts."
Academic Assessment and Critical Thinking
- Multiple-choice sections on exams, such as the AP exam, typically provide several answer choices that "kind of" work.
- Success on these assessments requires critical thinking to identify the one answer that most thoroughly encompasses all parts of a claim.
- Mastering the skill of identifying specific claims helps climbing the "mountain" of a complex argument more manageable and increases reader confidence.