Identifying Author Claims and Arguments

The Relationship Between Arguments and Claims

  • An argument represents the "mountain," or the overarching big idea of an entire piece of writing.
  • A claim is a "marker" or a small, specific aspect of the larger argument that an author processes with the reader.
  • Breaking down a large, academically critical reading into small claims prevents the brain from becoming overwhelmed and helps build a clearer understanding of the whole piece.

Case Study: Writing as a Profession

  • Overarching Argument: Writing professionally is difficult and requires a commitment to time, multiple revisions, and rejection.
  • Supporting Claim: A writer must continue to produce work even when they are not finding success.
  • To support the overall argument, the specific claim regarding continued effort correlates directly with the "commitment to rejection" mentioned in the main thesis.

Identifying Effective Textual Evidence

  • Close reading involves distinguishing between explicit, directly connected paragraphs and those that are merely transitional or supplemental.
  • When identifying which paragraph best illustrates a claim, it is necessary to find the section where the fullness of the concept is established.
  • Effectiveness is determined by how many components of the claim are present; for example, a paragraph mentioning both the inability to stop and the presence of "doubts" is more thorough than a paragraph that only mentions "doubts."

Academic Assessment and Critical Thinking

  • Multiple-choice sections on exams, such as the AP exam, typically provide several answer choices that "kind of" work.
  • Success on these assessments requires critical thinking to identify the one answer that most thoroughly encompasses all parts of a claim.
  • Mastering the skill of identifying specific claims helps climbing the "mountain" of a complex argument more manageable and increases reader confidence.