CS203-B Week 3: Representation: Semiotics & Mythology Study Notes

Representation: Semiotics & Mythology

Introduction

  • Semantics Definition: Umberto Eco (1932-2016) states, "Semiotics is in principle the discipline studying everything which can be used in order to lie. If something cannot be used to tell a lie, conversely it cannot be used to tell the truth: it cannot in fact be used ‘to tell at all’.” (Eco, 1976)

Part 1: Structuralism

Ferdinand de Saussure (1857-1913)

  • Father of Modern Linguistics
  • Contributions to Ancient and Indo-European Languages
  • University of Geneva (1892-1913)
  • Published Course in General Linguistics (1916) posthumously by students
  • Critical View: Rejects previous language theories, such as reflective theories.
  • Introduced terms: Structural Linguistics and Structuralism.

Structuralism Deconstructed

  • Objective: Examine laws, structures, and conventions that govern communication in society.
  • Concepts:
    • Langage: Universal underlying structure for linguistic communication systems.
    • Langue: The system of rules and conventions scientists study.
    • Parole: Actual spoken utterances (e.g., individual speech).
    • Synchronic: Study of language at a specific time.
    • Diachronic: Study of language change over time.

Signs in Structuralism

  • Sign Composition: Sign = Signifier + Signified
    • Signifier: The sound-image.
    • Signified: The concept or meaning linked to the signifier.
    • Both are termed “abstract mental entities” (Thwaites et al., 1994).

Characteristics of Linguistic Signs

  1. Arbitrary Nature of the Sign
    • Based on social convention.
    • Fixed by established rules.
  2. Linear Nature of the Signifier
    • Structured sequentially by time (oral) or space (writing).
  3. Immutability
    • Signs appear fixed, governed by language itself.
    • Reflects the “inherent conservatism of language”.
  4. Mutability
    • Arises from the arbitrariness, allowing collective change, though often unintentional.
    • Changes follow continuity principles (de Saussure, 1989).

Structuralist Anthropology: Claude Lévi-Strauss (1908-2009)

  • Binary Oppositions: Structure of society based on oppositions.
  • Methodology: Understand meanings in any society through patterns and categories of opposition.
  • Examples of Binary Oppositions: Human/Non-human; Nature/Culture.
  • Influence: Major impact on film studies.

Part 2: Semiotics (Semiology)

  • Definition of Semiology: "Study of signs" (from Greek).
  • Defined as the science of communication and sign systems — understanding phenomena and mental organization.
    • Reference to Marcel Danesi (1946-).

Language as a System of Signs

  • Language comprises: Langage = Langue + Parole (de saussure).
  • Key Insights:
    • Language is form, not substance.
    • Langue: Encompasses rules & conventions necessary for creating meanings.
    • Parole: Refers to effective language in use, or utterances.

Types of Signs in Semiotics

  1. Iconic Signs: Resemble what they represent.
  2. Indexical Signs: Have a logical connection with what they signify.
  3. Symbolic Signs: Based on arbitrary links established through convention.

The Arbitrary Nature of Linguistic Signs

  • A linguistic sign is recognized as arbitrary.
  • Example: The word "c-a-t" signifies the mental concept of a "cat" because it is distinct from other similar phonetic constructs, such as mat, hat, or rat.

Codes in Semiotics

  • Specific meanings arise only when signs are understood in relation to each other.
  • Codes establish arrangements of signs within particular contexts.
    • Examples of codes: traffic light colors, wedding attire, funeral attire.

Paradigm and Syntagm in Semiotics

  • Paradigm: Refers to the selection of signifiers (vertical), indicating choices.
  • Syntagm: Refers to a sequence or combination of signifiers (horizontal).
  • Meaning: Results from the interplay between selection and combination, supported by the underlying linguistic structure (Storey, 1998).

Part 3: Mythology

Roland Barthes (1915-1980)

  • Background in classical letters and multiple disciplines including sociology.
  • Wrote impactful works on cultural theories merging structuralism & semiotics into post-structuralism.

Key Works

  • Mythologies (1957/1972): Comprised 54 mini-essays critiquing French culture (e.g., wrestling, food, toys).
  • “Myth Today” (1957): Expounds concepts of mythology in contemporary contexts.

Definition of Myth

  • Common Definitions:
    • (a) A traditional story explaining origins of practices or beliefs.
      • Example: Ancient Greek or Celtic myths.
    • (b) A fictional story (Penguin Concise English Dictionary).

Barthes's Understanding of Mythology

  • Mythology Composition: Mythology is a combination of Semiology + Ideology.
  • Barthes redefines ‘myths’ to be historically based, not eternal.
  • Various media, including images and texts, contribute to myth-making.
  • Semiology: “science of forms”
  • Ideology: “historical science”

The Form of Myth vs. Content

  • Barthes asserts that myth is defined by the method of message delivery rather than its content.
    • “Myth is not defined by the object of its message, but by the way in which it utters this message” (Barthes, 1998).
  • Mythology arises in the 2nd (or 3rd) order of signification.

Signification Orders

  1. 1st Order of Signification: Denotation
    • Literal meaning, how sign says what it says.
    • Example: A cat defined as a cat, a red rose as a flower with thorns and scent.
  2. 2nd Order of Signification: Connotation
    • Associations evoked by the denotative meaning.
    • Produces expressive and evaluative meanings (O'Sullivan et al., 1983).

Transformation of Connotation into Myth

  • Case Study from Paris Match Magazine (1953):
    • First Order: Denotation with direct image reference.
    • Second Order: Connotation with contextual political influences.
    • Second (or third) Order translates to Myth: a politically charged depiction obscured as natural.

Characteristics of Myth

  • Myths present as natural and eternal but are inherently historical.
  • "Myth" often serves to back dominant ideology, detaching social realities from the political discourse (Bignell, 2002).
  • Myths reflect historical shifts and are transformational in nature.

Comparative Analysis in Cultural Contexts

  • Example: United Colors of Benetton campaign and its interplay with societal issues.
  • Consideration of modern myths from significant events, such as the Vietnam War representation.

Conclusion

  • Barthes’ theory posits myths as constructs that mask the historical context of ideas, turning them into perceived truths, thus influencing ideology and social narratives.
  • Understanding semiotics and mythology is crucial in analyzing media and cultural texts, revealing deeper meanings and societal implications.