Dependency Theory:
Weathly nations = core countries
Developing nations = periphery nations
Dependency theory - idea that developed countires exploit raw materials and cheap labour of devloping countries making developed countries richer and developing countries remain poor
Why Periphery countries stay poor:
Exploitation:
Core nations trade with periphery nations through exploiting their raw materials and cheap labour
Core nations then create expensive products with the raw material and sell the products back at a higher price leading to periphery countries staying poor whilst core nation become richer
Other ways:
Core sells periphery nations products that are often not needed
Core countries offer loans and aid to periphery countries as incentives to stay loyal to core countries
Structural adjustment programmes where periphery nations many to change the structure of their economy to favour free trade in order to get loans from core nations
Periphery countries that are dependent on 1/2 raw material products rely on core nations to buy them
Criticism of this model?
Many right winged free market economies have criticised the theory as the theory is based on left wing and Marxist perspectives
It is a outdated due to its simplistic view of the world, as it only sees the world as developed vs developing but it doesn't take into account the variation with each category
Emerging countries such as China and India defy this theory
Examples:
1962 total value of exports from Argentina was $106 mil whilst they paid $399 million for US imports
