Conical Pile Related Rates Problem
Problem Setup
- Conveyor belt pours sand at a constant volumetric rate.
- Given rate: dtdV=25 ft3/min
- Sand forms a pile shaped as a right circular cone.
- Visual cue: classic conical heap where base always perfectly circular.
- Geometric constraint: height equals diameter at every instant.
- Expressed as h=d.
- Since diameter d=2r, the relation becomes h=2r⇒r=2h (radius always half the height).
- Instant of interest: pile is h=18 ft tall.
- Target: find dtdh (rate of change of height) at that moment.
- Volume of a right circular cone:
V=31πr2h - Substitute radius–height relation to reduce variables (optional but conceptually useful):
V=31π(2h)2h=121πh3
- Many instructors keep r in place for implicit differentiation; both paths are valid.
- Keep variables symbolic, differentiate volume formula with respect to time t using implicit differentiation.
- Use product rule for r2h term if radius is not eliminated beforehand.
- Inject known numeric values ((h, r, \dfrac{dV}{dt})) and algebraically isolate dtdh.
- Leverage the permanent proportion dtdr=21dtdh derived from r=2h to eliminate the extra rate.
Differentiation (keeping $r$ explicit)
- Start: V=31πr2h
- Differentiate both sides w.r.t. t:
dtdV=31π(r2dtdh+h(2r)dtdr)
- Product rule applied to r2⋅h (first (r^2), second (h)).
- Chain rule invoked for r2 (derivative 2rdtdr).
Substitution of Numeric & Functional Data
- Compute instantaneous radius when h=18 ft:
r=2h=218=9 ft - Express dtdr via height rate:
dtdr=21dtdh - Plug into differentiated equation:
25=31π[(9)2dtdh+18⋅2⋅9(21dtdh)] - Simplify inside brackets:
- 92=81
- Factor 18⋅2⋅9=324 then times 21→162
- Combined expression: 81dtdh+162dtdh=243dtdh
- Isolate dtdh:
25=31π(243)dtdh⟹75=243πdtdh
dtdh=243π75≈0.0982 ft/min
Interpretation & Accuracy Check
- Height grows roughly 0.098 ft (E1.18 in) each minute at the specified instant.
- Units validate: (ft³/min)/(ft²) yields ft/min.
- Consistency: Positive sign shows pile is growing taller.
- Sensitivity: Any change in pour rate or cone proportion would alter result proportionally.
Quick Comparison: One-Variable Method (optional)
- Using V=121πh3 eliminates r and dtdr entirely.
- Differentiate: dtdV=41πh2dtdh
- Insert h=18 ft, dtdV=25:
25=41π(18)2dtdh⇒dtdh=81π25≈0.0982 ft/min
- Confirms original answer, showcasing elegance of variable reduction.
Broader Connections & Real-World Relevance
- Related-rates technique extends to:
- Liquid draining/filling, spread of light/shadows, motion in physics.
- Geometric similarity (constant ratio between variables) often simplifies analysis.
- Understanding derivative chains crucial for multivariable systems in engineering.
Ethical & Practical Implications
- Accurate rate calculations can prevent overflows or structural failures in industrial silos and hoppers.
- Misjudging pour rates may lead to environmental spills or economic loss.
Key Takeaways
- Always identify all rates and relations before differentiating.
- Decide whether to substitute constraints early (reduces algebra) or keep variables (eases conceptual tracking); both must yield same result.
- Keep units visible; they serve as an algebraic error-check.
- For cones with proportional dimensions, volume often simplifies to a single-variable power, yielding quick differentiation.