Rhetorical Analysis Lecture Notes
Definition of Rhetoric
Rhetoric = the art of persuasion or effective communication.
Focuses on the techniques used to compose a message or argument.
Key maxim to memorize: “Rhetoric is not what we are arguing, but how we are arguing it.”
“Mind the GAP” Framework
GAP = Genre — Audience — Purpose.
Whenever you craft or critique a message, always ask:
Genre: What kind of text is it (speech, tweet, email, essay, meme, etc.)?
Audience: Who is meant to receive it (best friend, professor, boss, child, voting public)?
Purpose: What is the communicator trying to achieve (inform, persuade, entertain, commemorate, call-to-action)?
What Is a Rhetorical Analysis?
An evaluation of how the author/speaker constructed their message, not a commentary on the topic itself.
Guiding question: “Which rhetorical choices were the most (or least) effective, and why?”
Involves judging each choice against GAP.
Difference Between Content Analysis vs. Rhetorical Analysis
Perspective | Primary Concern | Typical School Task? |
|---|---|---|
Content / Argument Analysis | What is being said; logical claims, evidence, accuracy | Very common |
Rhetorical Analysis | How it is being said; style, organization, appeals | Less familiar, source of confusion |
Reminder: A rhetorical analysis is a reaction to how something is discussed, not to what is discussed.
Factors That Shape Effective Rhetorical Choices
1. Audience
Language, tone, complexity, cultural references all shift with the audience.
Example: Explaining current events to fellow adults vs. simplifying for a child.
2. Genre
Form determines length, formality, and even allowable media.
Tweet → short, possibly includes GIFs/emojis.
Email to boss → longer, formal, emoji-free.
3. Purpose
Desired outcome governs style.
If the goal is to break up with “Salmon” (humorous classroom placeholder for a person), the message differs from making future plans.
Attempting to entertain allows jokes; explaining a devastating war demands seriousness.
A conceptual formula:
\text{Effectiveness} = f\big(\text{Audience},\;\text{Genre},\;\text{Purpose}\big)
Common Rhetorical Choices (Non-Exhaustive List)
Organization / structure
Quantity & quality of examples
Quotations & outside research
Word choice (diction)
Tone & register
Formatting / typographic emphasis
Anecdotes (short illustrative stories)
Images, graphics, GIFs, emojis
Rhetorical questions
Repetition & parallelism
Figurative language (metaphor, simile, analogy)
"Anything the author decides to do can count as a rhetorical choice – as long as you can point to it in the text and discuss its effect."
Step-by-Step Procedure for Performing a Rhetorical Analysis
Read / View the Text Carefully
Annotate noticeable choices; note immediate reactions.
Identify Rhetorical Choices
Highlight what technique is used and where it occurs.
Judge Effectiveness Using GAP
Ask: Did this choice move the intended audience closer to the author’s purpose within the constraints of the genre?
Gather Evidence
Collect direct quotations, timestamps, screenshots, or other concrete proof.
Draft the Analysis
Follow the Rules for Writing (below).
Rules for Writing a Rhetorical Analysis (3-Part Formula)
Claim — Clearly state whether the choice was effective or ineffective.
Evidence — Provide specific passages or examples from the text that illustrate the choice.
Reasoning — Explain why the choice worked (or failed) in relation to audience, genre, and purpose.
Avoid These Pitfalls
Don’t assume the reader sees what you see; always point explicitly to the example.
Don’t skip justification; explain why the choice matters.
Illustrative Classroom Examples Mentioned
Opening sentence in an essay: Some students start with a quotation; the rhetorical analysis compares whose opening line works best and why.
Tweet vs. Email: Demonstrates genre constraints (length, formality, media).
Adult-to-child explanation of world events: Shows audience adaptation.
Joke while describing war: Reveals mismatch between tone and purpose (ineffective).
Ethical & Practical Implications
Ethical communication requires sensitivity to audience and purpose; joking about tragedies can undermine credibility.
Misjudging rhetorical context can lead to misunderstanding, offense, or failure to persuade.
Connections to Future Lessons
Upcoming example: Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. speech — students will evaluate his choices against his civil-rights audience, sermonic-speech genre, and purpose to inspire social change.
Key Questions to Master (Step One Review)
What is a rhetorical analysis? — Evaluation of how messages are built.
What must you consider? — G + A + P (Genre, Audience, Purpose).
How do you decide if a choice was effective? — Measure against GAP and provide evidence.
What must you remember when discussing a choice? — Always (a) label the choice, (b) cite textual evidence, and (c) explain why it succeeds or fails.
End of comprehensive notes — these can stand in place of the original lecture transcript.