Soft-drink vs bottled water trend
Media headline: consumers seemingly switch to healthier bottled water.
Economics lens: a >20 % decline in the relative price of water vs soft drinks also drives the shift.
Milk market anecdote
\text{Money price of milk}\downarrow\ \text{by >}\frac{1}{3}\ \Rightarrow\ \text{Quantity supplied}\downarrow by “millions of gallons.”
Illustrates joint operation of demand & supply.
Market (general definition)
All institutional/physical arrangements enabling exchange.
Examples: automobile, health-care, high-speed Internet.
Central activity: price determination.
3.1 Law of demand.
3.2 Change in demand vs change in quantity demanded.
3.3 Law of supply.
3.4 Change in supply vs change in quantity supplied.
3.5 Interaction → equilibrium price & quantity.
Definition
Schedule showing quantities consumers will purchase at alternative prices in a given time period, ceteris paribus.
Law of Demand
Inverse P\uparrow \Rightarrow Qd\downarrow; P\downarrow \Rightarrow Qd\uparrow (holding all else constant).
Ceteris-Paribus Conditions held constant on a single demand curve
Income, tastes/preferences, prices of related goods, expectations, number of buyers, etc.
Money vs Relative Prices
Money price = nominal P^{\$}.
Relative price = price expressed in terms of another good: P{A/B}=\frac{PA}{P_B}.
Example (restaurant meals vs groceries, 2008-present): P{restaurant}/P{home} rose 12 %.
Quality-adjusted price example (old vs modern violins)
Blindfold tests ⇒ modern $\$1{,}000$ violins judged superior; old “Strads” had higher quality-adjusted prices.
Table lists {price, quantity} for constant-quality unit per period.
Demand curve = downward-sloping visual of schedule.
Figure 3-1 Example (wireless earbuds):
Combination A–E shows 10 \rightarrow 50 units as P falls 5\$ \rightarrow 1\$.
Pay-What-You-Want (PWYW) behavior
Charitable settings: altruism ⇒ actual payments > self-interested WTP.
Horizontal summation of individual curves: QD^{market}=\sumi Q_{di}(P).
Figure 3-2: two buyers → combined demand for earbuds rises from 20 to 110 units as P moves 5→1.
Figure 3-3: whole market (millions of earbuds) illustrates same principle.
Conceptual rule
Any change in a ceteris-paribus factor shifts the entire curve; price change alone ⇒ move along curve.
Graphical representation (Fig. 3-4): right shift D1 \rightarrow D2, left shift D1 \rightarrow D3.
Determinants & Direction
Income
Normal good: income↑ ⇒ demand↑.
Inferior good: income↑ ⇒ demand↓.
Prices of related goods
Substitutes: P{sub}\uparrow \Rightarrow D{good}\uparrow (same direction).
China solar vs coal: cheaper solar ↓→ coal demand falls >4 %/yr.
Complements: P{comp}\uparrow \Rightarrow D{good}\downarrow (opposite direction).
Expectations
Expected future price ↑ ⇒ current demand ↑.
Expected future income ↑ ⇒ current demand ↑.
Expected shortages ↓availability ⇒ current demand ↑.
Market size (# buyers) ↑ ⇒ demand curve shifts right.
Change vs. Movement
Shift = “change in demand.”
Movement = “change in quantity demanded.” (Fig. 3-5 illustrates point‐to‐point moves.)
Definition
Schedule of quantities sellers will offer at alternative prices during a time period, c.p.
Law of Supply
Direct relationship: P\uparrow \Rightarrow Qs\uparrow\,,\; P\downarrow \Rightarrow Qs\downarrow.
Supply Schedule & Curve
Figure 3-6: producer supplies 55k → 20k units as P falls 5→1.
Market Supply
Horizontal addition: QS^{market}=\sumj Q_{sj}(P).
Figure 3-7: two suppliers; Figure 3-8: whole industry (millions of units).
Rule analogue to demand
Shift when a non-price determinant changes; movement when P itself changes.
Determinants
Technology/Productivity ↑ ⇒ supply right (costs ↓).
Ex: additive manufacturing (3-D printed jewelry) allows more output at any P.
Input costs ↑ ⇒ supply left.
Price expectations
Anticipated future P↑ ⇒ suppliers hold back today ⇒ supply left.
Note simultaneous buyer reaction: demand right (What-Happens-When box).
Taxes ↑ / Subsidies ↓ ⇒ supply left; reverse moves right.
# Firms ↑ ⇒ supply right.
Graph (Fig. 3-9): S1 \rightarrow S2 (right shift) lowers market price at each quantity.
Equilibrium (market-clearing) price P^*
Defined by intersection where Qd(P^)=Qs(P^).
Stable; absent shocks price gravitates to P^*.
Table/Graph (Fig. 3-10)
Earbuds: P^=3\$\,,\; Q^=6 million/yr.
Surplus (excess supply) when P> P^*: drives price down.
Shortage (excess demand) when P< P^*: drives price up.
Shortage vs Scarcity
Scarcity = fundamental limited resources; always present.
Shortage = market phenomenon at given P < P^*.
International vegetable shortage
UK heat wave ↓ supply → equilibrium prices ↑: broccoli +37 %, cauliflower +81 %, etc.
Panera Bread kiosks
Waiting time ↓ 8→1 min reduces quality-adjusted price; demand for meals ↑.
Soft-drink vs Bottled water case study (Issues & Apps)
Demand shift story (health) incomplete; relative price of water ↓ >20 % while soft-drink price ↑.
Water & soda are substitutes; fall in P_{water} shifts water demand right & soda demand left.
Demand for tourism depends on P, income, tastes, and complements/substitutes.
Key c.p. variable: number of tourists.
Big-data/AI improve estimation accuracy → better policy & pricing decisions.
3.1 Law of demand: P\uparrow \Rightarrow Q_d\downarrow; people react to relative, not nominal prices only.
3.2 Change in demand vs quantity demanded: shift vs movement.
3.3 Law of supply: P\uparrow \Rightarrow Q_s\uparrow.
3.4 Change in supply vs quantity supplied: shift vs movement.
3.5 Equilibrium via intersection: surplus when P>P^, shortage when P.
Relative price formula: P{A/B}=\frac{PA}{P_B}.
Table 3-1 cloud servers vs external drives example:
Year 1: P_{cloud/ex} = \frac{300}{150}=2.0.
Year 2: P_{cloud/ex} = \frac{210}{140}=1.5.
Horizontal summation (demand or supply): Q^{market}(P) = \sumi Qi(P).
Market-clearing condition: Qs(P^) = Qd(P^)$$.