Universal Quantifier (∀): Read as "for all" or "for every". A statement (∀x∈E):P(x) is true if and only if the predicate P(x) holds true for every element x in the set E.
Existential Quantifier (∃): Read as "there exists at least one". A statement (∃x∈E):P(x) is true if there exists at least one element x0∈E for which P(x0) is true.
Rules of Logical Negation:
Negation of Universal Statement: (∀x∈E):P(x)⟺(∃x∈E):P(x)
Negation of Existential Statement: (∃x∈E):P(x)⟺(∀x∈E):P(x)
Negation of Implication: P⟹Q⟺P∧Q
De Morgan's Laws: P∧Q⟺P∨Q and P∨Q⟺P∧Q
Methods of Proof:
Direct Deduction: To prove P⟹Q, assume P is true and apply logical deductions to arrive at Q.
Proof by Counterexample: To prove that a universal proposition (∀x∈E):P(x) is false, construct a specific element x0∈E (a counterexample) for which P(x0) is false.
Proof by Contrapositive: The implication P⟹Q is logically equivalent to its contrapositive Q⟹P. Proving Q⟹P establishes P⟹Q
Proof by Logical Equivalence: To prove P⟺Q, demonstrate a chain of reversible logic steps P⟺R1⟺R2⟺⋯⟺Q, or prove both implications P⟹Q and Q⟹P
Proof by Disjunction of Cases: If the universal domain E can be partitioned into exhaustive cases E1,E2,…,Ek, proving the statement for each individual case proves it for all E
Proof by Contradiction (Reductio ad Absurdum): To prove P is true, assume its negation P is true, and derive a logical impossibility or contradiction (such as 1=0 or a∧a).
Mathematical Induction: To prove a proposition P(n) for all integers n≥n0:
Initialization (Base Case): Show P(n0) is true.
Heredity (Inductive Step): Assume P(k) is true for an arbitrary integer k≥n0, and prove P(k+1) is true.
Conclusion: Conclude that P(n) is true for all integers n≥n0
Exercise 1: Quantified Statements, Truth Values, and Negations
Statement P1:
Form: P1:(∃x∈R):3x+6=0
Truth Value Analysis: Solving 3x+6=0 yields x=−2. Since −2∈R, there exists a real solution.
Truth Value: True
Negation: P1:(∀x∈R):3x+6=0
Statement P2:
Form: P2:(∃x∈R):x2−3x+2=0
Truth Value Analysis: The quadratic equation has discriminant Δ=(−3)2−4(1)(2)=1>0, providing real solutions x=1 and x=2. Thus, the existential condition is satisfied.
Truth Value: True
Negation: P2:(∀x∈R):x2−3x+2=0
Statement P3:
Form: P3:(∀x∈[1;6]):x2−7x+6≤0
Truth Value Analysis: Factorizing the quadratic gives x2−7x+6=(x−1)(x−6). For any x∈[1;6], x−1≥0 and x−6≤0. The product of a non-negative number and a non-positive number is non-positive (≤0). Thus, the inequality holds for all x in the interval.
Truth Value: True
Negation: P3:(∃x∈[1;6]):x2−7x+6>0
Statement P4:
Form: P4:(∀x∈R):x2−2x+3>0
Truth Value Analysis: Rewriting as a completed square yields x2−2x+3=(x−1)2+2. Since (x−1)2≥0 for all real x, (x−1)2+2≥2>0. Alternatively, discriminant Δ=4−12=−8<0 with coefficient a=1>0, so the polynomial is strictly positive everywhere on R.
Truth Value: True
Negation: P4:(∃x∈R):x2−2x+3≤0
Exercise 2: Proof by Counterexample
Disproving Proposition P1:
Proposition: P1:(∀x∈R):x2=x
Counterexample Construction: Choose x=−2∈R.
Verification: (−2)2=4=2. However, x=−2. Since 2=−2, x2=x for x=−2.
Conclusion: P1 is false.
Disproving Proposition P2:
Proposition: P2:(∀x∈R):x2≥x
Counterexample Construction: Choose x=21∈R.
Verification: x2=(21)2=41. Comparing values, 41<21, which means x2<x.
Conclusion: P2 is false.
Negation of Implication Proposition (R):
Given Proposition: (R):(∀x∈R):[x2=2x⟹x=0]
Applying the negation rule A⟹B⟺A∧B:
Negation: R:(∃x∈R):[x2=2x et x=0]
Deducing Truth Value of Proposition (R):
Test x=2∈R:
Evaluating premises: 22=4 and 2×2=4, so x2=2x is true.
Evaluating conclusion condition: x=2=0, so x=0 is true.
Since R is true for x=2, the original statement (R) is false.
Exercise 3: Counterexample Method Applied to Real Functions
Setting: Function f defined on R by f(x)=x2−3x+2
Solving f(x)=0 in R:
Equation: x2−3x+2=0
Factorization: (x−1)(x−2)=0
Solutions: x=1 or x=2
Solution Set: S={1,2}
Negation of Proposition (P):
Given Proposition: (P):(∀(a,b)∈R2):f(a)=f(b)⟹a=b
Negation: P:(∃(a,b)∈R2):[f(a)=f(b) et a=b]
Deducing (P) is False:
Choose a=1 and b=2.
From the roots solved above, f(1)=0 and f(2)=0, so f(1)=f(2).
Since 1=2, the negation P holds true.
Conclusion: Proposition (P) is false (meaning f is not injective).
Evaluation of f(1) and f(−1) and Function Parity Analysis:
Calculation of f(1): f(1)=12−3(1)+2=0
Calculation of f(−1): f(−1)=(−1)2−3(−1)+2=1+3+2=6
Testing Evenness Condition ((∀x):f(−x)=f(x)):
For x=1, f(−1)=6 and f(1)=0. Since 6=0, f(−1)=f(1). Thus, f is not even.
Testing Oddness Condition ((∀x):f(−x)=−f(x)):
For x=1, f(−1)=6 and −f(1)=−0=0. Since 6=0, f(−1)=−f(1). Thus, f is not odd.
Conclusion: The function f is neither even nor odd.
Exercise 4: Direct Implication and Contraposition
Setting: Real variable x∈R and proposition (P):(x2=4x)⟹(x=0 ou x=4)
Direct Proof that (P) is True:
Assume the premise x2=4x
Subtract 4x from both sides: x2−4x=0
Factor out x: x(x−4)=0
Apply zero-product property: x=0 ou x−4=0
Solving the linear term gives x=0 ou x=4
Since the conclusion follows directly from the premise, proposition (P) is true.
Determining the Contrapositive Implication:
General Rule: The contrapositive of A⟹B is B⟹A
Here, premise A is x2=4x
Conclusion B is (x=0 ou x=4)
Negation B: (x=0 ou x=4)⟺(x=0 et x=4)
Negation A: x2=4x
Contrapositive Form: (x=0 et x=4)⟹x2=4x
Exercise 5: Domain of Definition of Real-Valued Functions
Function 1:f(x)=x4−5x−2
Type: Polynomial function
Constraint: Defined for all real numbers
Domain of Definition: Df=R
Function 2:f(x)=x2−4x+4
Type: Rational function
Constraint: Denominator must be non-zero
Condition: x2−4=0⟺(x−2)(x+2)=0⟺x=2 et x=−2
Domain of Definition: Df=R∖{−2,2}=]−∞,−2[∪]−2,2[∪]2,+∞[
Function 3:f(x)=6−2x
Type: Square root function
Constraint: Radicand must be non-negative
Condition: 6−2x≥0⟺2x≤6⟺x≤3
Domain of Definition: Df=]−∞,3]
Function 4:f(x)=x2−2x+2
Type: Square root function
Constraint: x2−2x+2≥0
Discriminant Analysis: Δ=(−2)2−4(1)(2)=4−8=−4<0
Sign Analysis: Since Δ<0 and leading coefficient a=1>0, x2−2x+2>0 for all x∈R
Domain of Definition: Df=R
Function 5:f(x)=x2−5x
Type: Square root function
Constraint: x2−5x≥0
Factorization: x(x−5)≥0
Roots: x=0 and x=5
Sign Table Analysis: The product is positive outside the roots (−∞,0] and [5,+∞), and negative inside (0,5)
Domain of Definition: Df=]−∞,0]∪[5,+∞[
Exercise 6: Direct Deductive Reasoning
Proof 1: Let x∈R and y∈R. Show (x2+y2=2xy)⟹(x=y)
Proof:
x2+y2=2xy⟹x2−2xy+y2=0(x−y)2=0x−y=0x=y
Proof 2: Let x∈R and y∈R. Show (1+xy−x−y=0)⟹(y=1 ou x=1)
Proof by Factorization:
1+xy−x−y=0⟹(1−x)−y(1−x)=0(1−x)(1−y)=01−x=0 ou 1−y=0x=1 ou y=1
Proof 3: Show that if m and n are two odd natural integers, then m+n is even
Proof:
Since m and n are odd natural numbers, by definition there exist integers k∈N and p∈N such that m=2k+1 and n=2p+1
Adding the expressions:
m+n=(2k+1)+(2p+1)=2k+2p+2=2(k+p+1)
Define k′=k+p+1∈N. Then m+n=2k′, which matches the definition of an even integer.
Since (x−1)2≥0 and 2(x2+1)>0 for all real x, the final inequality is unconditionally true. Thus, by equivalence, the initial inequality holds.
Proof 2: For x,y∈R+, show x+y=x+y⟺(x=0 ou y=0)
Equivalence Chain (squaring non-negative expressions):
x+y=x+y⟺(x+y)2=(x+y)2⟺x+y=x+2xy+y⟺0=2xy⟺xy=0⟺xy=0⟺x=0 ou y=0
Proof 3: For a,b∈R+, show (a+b=0)⟺(a=0 et b=0)
Right-to-Left Implication (⇐):
If a=0 and b=0, then a+b=0+0=0.
Left-to-Right Implication (⇒):
Assume a+b=0. Since a≥0 and b≥0, if either a or b were strictly positive, the sum a+b would be strictly positive (>0). Hence, for non-negative terms to sum to zero, both must be zero (a=0 and b=0).
Proof 4: For x,y∈R+, show (x+y+13=4x+6y)⟺(x=4 et y=9)
Since squares of real numbers are non-negative, the sum of two squares equals zero if and only if each squared term is zero:
⟺x−2=0 et y−3=0⟺x=2 et y=3⟺x=4 et y=9
Exercise 8: Proof by Disjunction of Cases
Problem 1: Show that for all n∈N, n2+n+1 is odd using cases n=2k and n=2k+1
Case 1 (n is even, n=2k where k∈N):
n2+n+1=(2k)2+2k+1=4k2+2k+1=2(2k2+k)+1
Set k′=2k2+k∈N. n2+n+1=2k′+1, which is odd.
Case 2 (n is odd, n=2k+1 where k∈N):
n2+n+1=(2k+1)2+(2k+1)+1=4k2+4k+1+2k+1+1=4k2+6k+3=2(2k2+3k+1)+1
Set k′′=2k2+3k+1∈N. n2+n+1=2k′′+1, which is odd.
Conclusion: In all cases, n2+n+1 is odd.
Problem 2: Show that n(n+1)(n+2) is a multiple of 3 using cases n=3k, n=3k+1, n=3k+2
Case 1 (n=3k):
n(n+1)(n+2)=3k(3k+1)(3k+2)=3[k(3k+1)(3k+2)], divisible by 3.
Case 2 (n=3k+1):
n+2=(3k+1)+2=3k+3=3(k+1)n(n+1)(n+2)=(3k+1)(3k+2)⋅3(k+1)=3[(3k+1)(3k+2)(k+1)]
divisible by 3.
Case 3 (n=3k+2):
n+1=(3k+2)+1=3k+3=3(k+1)n(n+1)(n+2)=(3k+2)⋅3(k+1)⋅(3k+4)=3[(3k+2)(k+1)(3k+4)]
divisible by 3.
Conclusion: n(n+1)(n+2) is always a multiple of 3.
Problem 3: Show (∀x∈R):x2+1−x>0 using cases x<0 and x≥0
Case 1 (x<0):
Since x<0, −x>0. Additionally, x2+1>0.
The sum of two strictly positive numbers x2+1+(−x)=x2+1−x>0
Case 2 (x≥0):
x2+1>x2⟹x2+1>x2=∣x∣=x (since x≥0).
Subtracting x from both sides yields x2+1−x>0
Conclusion: The inequality holds for all x∈R.
Problem 4: Solve equations in R using disjunction of cases:
Equation (E1):x2−∣x−1∣−1=0
Case 1 (x<1⟹∣x−1∣=−(x−1)=1−x):
x2−(1−x)−1=0⟺x2+x−2=0
Factorization: (x+2)(x−1)=0⟹x=−2 ou x=1
Filtering by constraint x<1 gives solution S1={−2}
Case 2 (x≥1⟹∣x−1∣=x−1):
x2−(x−1)−1=0⟺x2−x=0⟺x(x−1)=0⟹x=0 ou x=1
Filtering by constraint x≥1 gives solution S2={1}
Total Solution Set: S=S1∪S2={−2,1}
Equation (E2):∣x+1∣−3∣x−2∣+1=0
Partitioning R around critical points x=−1 and x=2:
Sub-case 1 (x∈]−∞,−1[):
∣x+1∣=−x−1 and ∣x−2∣=−(x−2)=2−x−x−1−3(2−x)+1=0⟺2x−6=0⟺x=3
Since 3∈/]−∞,−1[, there are no solutions in this interval.
Sub-case 2 (x∈[−1,2]):
∣x+1∣=x+1 and ∣x−2∣=2−x(x+1)−3(2−x)+1=0⟺4x−4=0⟺x=1
Since 1∈[−1,2], x=1 is a valid solution.
Sub-case 3 (x∈]2,+∞[):
∣x+1∣=x+1 and ∣x−2∣=x−2(x+1)−3(x−2)+1=0⟺−2x+8=0⟺x=4
Since 4∈]2,+∞[, x=4 is a valid solution.
Total Solution Set: S={1,4}
Exercise 9: Proof by Contrapositive
Problem 1a: For y∈R and x∈R∗, show (y=2 et y=−2)⟹(2y2−8=0)
Contrapositive Statement: (2y2−8=0)⟹(y=2 ou y=−2)
Proof of Contrapositive:
2y2−8=0⟹2(y2−4)=0⟹y2=4⟹y=2 ou y=−2
Since the contrapositive is true, the original implication holds.
Problem 1b: For x∈R∗, show (x=0)⟹(x+1=1+2x)
Contrapositive Statement: (x+1=1+2x)⟹(x=0)
Proof of Contrapositive:
Assume x+1=1+2x
Squaring both sides:
x+1=(1+2x)2=1+x+4x2
Subtracting x+1 from both sides:
0=4x2⟹x2=0⟹x=0
Since the contrapositive is true, the original implication holds.
Problem 2: For n∈N, show that if n2 is even, then n is even
Contrapositive Statement: If n is odd, then n2 is odd.
Proof of Contrapositive:
Assume n is odd, so n=2k+1 for some k∈N.
n2=(2k+1)2=4k2+4k+1=2(2k2+2k)+1=2k′+1
where k′=2k2+2k∈N. Thus, n2 is odd.
Conclusion: By contraposition, if n2 is even, then n is even.
Problem 3: For x,y∈]2;+∞[, show (x=y)⟹(x2−4x=y2−4y)
Contrapositive Statement: (x2−4x=y2−4y)⟹(x=y)
Proof of Contrapositive:
Assume x2−4x=y2−4yx2−y2−4x+4y=0⟹(x−y)(x+y)−4(x−y)=0(x−y)(x+y−4)=0
Since x>2 and y>2, adding the inequalities gives x+y>4, which implies x+y−4>0.
Since x+y−4=0, we divide by (x+y−4) to get x−y=0⟹x=y
Conclusion: The original implication is proved.
Exercise 10: Proof by Contradiction (Absurdity)
Problem 1: Show that (∀x∈R−{32}):3x−24x+1=34
Proof by Contradiction:
Assume there exists x∈R∖{32} such that 3x−24x+1=34
Cross-multiplying yields:
3(4x+1)=4(3x−2)12x+3=12x−8
Subtracting 12x from both sides:
3=−8
This is an impossible mathematical contradiction. Hence, the original proposition is true.
Problem 2: Show that (∀n∈N):4n+26n+5∈/N
Proof by Contradiction:
Assume there exists n∈N such that k=4n+26n+5∈N6n+5=k(4n+2)=2k(2n+1)
Analyzing parity:
Left side: 6n+5=2(3n+2)+1, which is an odd integer.
Right side: 2[k(2n+1)], which is an even integer.
An odd integer cannot equal an even integer (contradiction). Thus, 4n+26n+5∈/N.
Problem 3: Show that (∀x∈R):x−x2+1<0
Proof by Contradiction:
Assume there exists x∈R such that x−x2+1≥0
Rearranging gives x≥x2+1
Since x2+1>0, x must be strictly positive (x>0).
Squaring both non-negative sides:
x2≥(x2+1)2⟹x2≥x2+1⟹0≥1
This is a contradiction. Therefore, x−x2+1<0 for all x∈R.
Exercise 11: Mathematical Induction and Summation Formulas
Setting: For all n∈N∗, let Sn=1+2+⋯+n
Calculating First Terms:
S1=1
S2=1+2=3
S3=1+2+3=6
Proof by Recurrence of Formula Sn=2n(n+1):
Initialization: For n=1, S1=1 and 21(1+1)=22=1. The formula holds for n=1
Since Sn=2n(n+1)∈N as a sum of natural integers, multiplying both sides by 2 gives n(n+1)=2Sn.
Because n(n+1) is expressed as 2 times an integer Sn, n(n+1) is always even.
Calculating S100:
S100=2100(100+1)=50×101=5050
Exercise 12: Divisibility, Inequalities, and Sums by Recurrence
Problem 1: Prove (∀n∈N∗):7n−2n is divisible by 5
Initialization: For n=1, 71−21=5=5×1, divisible by 5. True for n=1
Heredity: Let k∈N∗. Assume 7k−2k=5m for some m∈N.
7k+1−2k+1=7⋅7k−2⋅2k=7⋅7k−7⋅2k+7⋅2k−2⋅2k=7(7k−2k)+2k(7−2)=7(5m)+5(2k)=5(7m+2k)
Since 7m+2k∈N, 7k+1−2k+1 is divisible by 5.
Conclusion:7n−2n is divisible by 5 for all n∈N∗
Problem 2: Prove (∀n∈N):1+4+42+⋯+4n=34n+1−1
Initialization: For n=0, Left Side = 40=1, Right Side = 340+1−1=33=1. True for n=0
Heredity: Let k∈N. Assume 1+4+⋯+4k=34k+1−1.
1+4+⋯+4k+4k+1=34k+1−1+4k+1=34k+1−1+3⋅4k+1=34⋅4k+1−1=34k+2−1
Conclusion: True for all n∈N
Problem 3: Prove (∀n∈N):1+23+33+⋯+n3=[2n(n+1)]2
Initialization: For n=0, sum is 0 and [20]2=0. For n=1, 13=1 and [21(2)]2=1. True.
Heredity: Assume true for k∈N.
13+23+⋯+k3+(k+1)3=[2k(k+1)]2+(k+1)3=(k+1)2[4k2+(k+1)]=(k+1)2[4k2+4k+4]=(k+1)24(k+2)2=[2(k+1)(k+2)]2
Conclusion: True for all n∈N
Problem 4: Prove (∀n∈N):2n≥n
Initialization: For n=0, 20=1≥0. True for n=0
Heredity: Let k∈N. Assume 2k≥k.
2k+1=2⋅2k≥2k=k+k
For k≥1, k+k≥k+1, so 2k+1≥k+1.
For k=0, 21=2≥1, which also holds.
Conclusion:2n≥n for all n∈N
Exercise 13: Polynomial Expansion and Induction on Sum of Squares
Expanding Product (n+2)(2n+3):
(n+2)(2n+3)=n(2n)+3n+2(2n)+6=2n2+3n+4n+6=2n2+7n+6
Proof by Recurrence for Sum of Squares Formula:
Proposition: (∀n∈N∗):12+22+⋯+n2=6n(n+1)(2n+1)
Initialization: For n=1, Left Side = 12=1. Right Side = 61(1+1)(2(1)+1)=61⋅2⋅3=1. True for n=1
Heredity: Let k∈N∗. Assume 12+22+⋯+k2=6k(k+1)(2k+1).
Adding (k+1)2 to both sides:
12+22+⋯+k2+(k+1)2=6k(k+1)(2k+1)+(k+1)2
Factor out (k+1):
=(k+1)[6k(2k+1)+(k+1)]=(k+1)[62k2+k+6k+6]=(k+1)[62k2+7k+6]
Substitute the expansion result 2k2+7k+6=(k+2)(2k+3):
=6(k+1)(k+2)(2k+3)
Conclusion: By induction, 12+22+⋯+n2=6n(n+1)(2n+1) holds for all n∈N∗