CH 5.3_factors that help explain differences in educational achievement and experience
Patterns in educational achievement and experience
Educational inequality – differences in educational achievement and experience between social groups.
Sociologists study patterns based on:
Social class
Ethnicity
Gender
Global differences in education
Different groups may:
Be treated differently in schools
Experience different teaching methods
Achieve different levels of success
Have different experiences of education
Important reminder
Sociological patterns apply to large groups, not every individual.
Some individuals from disadvantaged backgrounds achieve highly, even if overall patterns show inequality.
Patterns and explanations for differences in educational achievement and experience based on social class
Social class and education
Social class is a major factor influencing educational achievement.
Historically:
Education mainly for upper-class children.
Working-class children received little or very basic schooling.
System was effectively two-tier:
Basic or no schooling for most children
High-quality education for privileged groups.
Example: UK historical system
Working-class children → basic primary schools run by churches/charities.
Upper-class children → private boarding schools.
Modern changes
Most children now attend similar state schools.
However, fee-paying private schools still give advantages to wealthier families
I. Material factors
Material deprivation
Material deprivation – lack of money and resources that affects a child's education.
Ways poverty can disadvantage students
No quiet place to study (small or crowded homes).
Poor diet → tiredness and poor concentration.
Cannot afford school uniforms, equipment, trips, sports kit.
Lack of pre-school education, leading to starting school behind others.
Limited digital access (no laptop, tablet, internet).
Example: COVID-19 pandemic
Some students could study online at home.
Others without internet could not continue learning effectively.
Other disadvantages
Few books or educational materials at home.
Part-time jobs to support family income → less time to study.
II. Cultural and social factors
Cultural deprivation
Cultural deprivation – lack of values, attitudes, and behaviours that support educational success.
Possible working-class cultural factors
Fatalism
Belief that individuals cannot control their future.
May reduce motivation to succeed at school.
Immediate gratification
Preference for short-term rewards (earning money now).
Less focus on long-term goals like university.
Deferred gratification (middle-class value)
Willingness to delay rewards for future benefits (better job, higher income).
Search for excitement
Lack of opportunities may lead some youth to deviant behaviour or crime.
Linked to masculinity culture valuing risk and rule-breaking.
Parental attitudes
Some parents may value education less due to negative school experiences.
Criticism of cultural deprivation theory
Suggests working-class culture is inferior, which many sociologists reject.
Many working-class parents:
Value education
Want their children to succeed.
Possible real issues
Lack of knowledge of the education system.
Lack of confidence to challenge schools.
Some parents avoid school contact due to bad past experiences.
III. Cultural capital
Cultural capital (Pierre Bourdieu)
Cultural capital – knowledge, values, skills, and cultural experiences that help individuals succeed in education.
Two types of capital
Economic capital
Financial resources available to support education.
Cultural capital
Cultural knowledge and behaviours valued by schools.
Examples of cultural capital
Familiarity with books and reading.
Visits to museums, galleries, concerts.
Strong belief in importance of education.
Middle-class advantages
Parents understand how the education system works.
Can help children navigate exams, school choices, and opportunities.
Working-class disadvantage
Less cultural capital.
Teachers may perceive them less favourably.
IV. Home and community factors
Home and community influences
Home and community environments may reinforce educational disadvantage.
Examples
Attending schools in poorer areas
Often have fewer resources and funding.
Higher levels of social or behavioural problems.
Families may be unable to afford university education.
Children may lower their ambitions early.
Community loyalty
Moving up socially may be seen as rejecting your community.
Lack of role models
If no one around has succeeded academically, education may seem irrelevant.
Local problems
Crime, gangs, drugs can disrupt education.
Middle-class advantage
Parents more able to:
Buy books and resources
Pay for private tutors or extra lessons.
V. Linguistic factors
Language codes (Basil Bernstein, 1971)
Restricted code
Informal everyday language used with family and friends.
Limited vocabulary.
Meanings often implicit because people share context.
Elaborated code
Language used in schools, textbooks, formal writing.
Meanings explicit and detailed.
Allows expression of complex and abstract ideas.
Bernstein's argument
Middle-class children more familiar with elaborated code.
Teachers may interpret this as greater ability.
Important note
Restricted code is not inferior.
Everyone uses it.
Advantage lies in being able to switch between both codes.
VI. Compensatory education
Compensatory education
Government programmes designed to reduce educational disadvantage.
Aim to compensate for disadvantages in children's backgrounds.
Examples
Extra funding for disadvantaged schools.
Incentives to attract high-quality teachers to poorer areas.
Free preschool programmes for disadvantaged children.
Goal
Ensure children start school with basic literacy and social skills.
VII. In-school factors
School influence on achievement
Some sociologists argue school factors also affect achievement.
Michael Rutter (1979) – Fifteen Thousand Hours
Found school quality can influence life chances.
Effective schools have:
Good organisation
Clear rules
High expectations for students
Tim Morris (2021)
Children who enjoy school at age 6 often achieve higher exam results at 16.
Problems in disadvantaged schools
Less funding.
More behavioural and social problems.
Lower academic expectations.
Peer groups and sub-cultures
Pro-school subculture
Students who support school values and norms.
Believe in studying hard and academic success.
Often linked with middle-class learners.
Anti-school subculture (counter-school subculture)
Students reject school values.
Often formed by learners who struggle academically.
Examples of anti-school behaviour
Truanting (missing school without permission).
Avoiding schoolwork.
Cheating in homework or tests.
Being aggressive or disrespectful towards teachers.
Bullying hard-working students.
Involvement in delinquency or crime.
Reason for anti-school subcultures
Provide status and self-esteem among peers when academic success is unlikely.
Patterns and explanations for differences in educational achievement and experience based on ethnicity
Link with social class
Many minority ethnic groups are more likely to be working class
This leads to:
Material disadvantage
Lower access to educational resources
Some immigrant groups:
Come from low-income backgrounds
Or lose previous social status after migration
So ethnic inequality often overlaps with class inequality
I. Institutional racism
Definition
Institutional racism – discrimination built into institutions (education, justice, health, etc.), often unintentionally
In education
Schools may:
Treat ethnic minority learners unfairly
Reinforce inequality through systems and practices
Examples of institutional racism
Higher exclusion rates for some ethnic groups
Unequal expectations from teachers
Biased disciplinary systems
Ethnic stereotypes influencing school decisions
Effects
Ethnic minority learners may:
Feel excluded or unfairly treated
Develop negative attitudes toward school
Rebel against school authority
Experience lower achievement
II. Ethnocentric curriculum
Definition
Ethnocentrism – belief that the dominant culture is superior or “normal”
Ethnocentric curriculum – school curriculum based mainly on dominant culture
Examples in schools
Language teaching – minority languages seen as less valuable
Literature – focus on majority culture texts
History – lack of minority ethnic history
Religion – dominant religion prioritised in assemblies
Festivals – majority culture celebrations dominate
Effects
Minority ethnic learners may:
Feel excluded or unrepresented
Lose interest in education
Feel their culture is inferior
Colonial influence
Some countries still use:
Colonial language (e.g. English/French)
Curriculum based on former coloniser’s culture
III. Role models
Institutional racism can lead to lack of role models
Few ethnic minority teachers or professionals in:
Schools
Business
Politics
Effects
Learners may:
Have lower aspirations
Believe success is less achievable
Limit career goals
IV. Linguistic factors
Language disadvantage
Some learners are taught in a non-native language
This can cause:
Difficulty understanding lessons
Slower academic progress
Devaluation of languages
Minority languages may be seen as:
“Incorrect” or “uneducated”
Example:
African American Vernacular English (AAVE)
Once wrongly seen as “bad English”
Labov showed it has rules and structure
Impact
Learners may be:
Marked down unfairly
Misjudged as low ability
Bilingual advantage
Being bilingual or multilingual can:
Improve cognitive skills
Help learning flexibility
V. Cultural, material and social factors
Cultural factors
Education success may depend on:
Value placed on schooling
Religion or cultural expectations
Conflicts between school and home values may:
Reduce achievement
Teacher stereotypes
Appearance, speech, or behaviour may:
Reinforce stereotypes
Lead to self-fulfilling prophecy
Material factors
Minority ethnic groups may be more likely to be:
Working class
This leads to:
Lack of resources
Reduced access to educational support
VI. Home and community factors
Parental support and aspiration
Example: Chinese learners in UK (Archer)
Parents strongly value education
High expectations (“be the best” not just “do your best”)
Frequent involvement in education
Effects of strong home support
Clear educational goals
High motivation
Strong achievement outcomes
Community influence
Family and community culture can:
Encourage or discourage academic success
Shape ambition levels
Influence attitudes toward education
VII. In-school factors
Institutional racism in schools
Schools may:
Place minority ethnic learners in lower sets/streams
Use ethnocentric curriculum
Hold lower expectations
Fail to challenge racism
Labelling and self-fulfilling prophecy
Teachers may label students as:
“Troublemakers”
“Low ability”
This can lead to:
Lower achievement
Behaviour changes matching label
Pro-school and anti-school subcultures
Pro-school subculture
Supports school values
Encourages:
Hard work
Academic success
Anti-school subculture
Rejects school authority
May involve:
Truancy
Disruptive behaviour
Resistance to teachers
Examples
Tony Sewell
Studied African Caribbean boys
Found some formed anti-school “rebels”
Linked to experiences of racism
Mac an Ghaill (“Black sisters”)
Minority ethnic girls
Criticised school system but still succeeded academically
Shows subcultures are not always purely anti-education
VIII. Labelling theory
Definition
Labelling theory – behaviour and achievement influenced by labels given by others (especially teachers)
Key ideas
Teachers may:
Label ethnic minority learners as low ability or disruptive
Base judgement on stereotypes, not ability
Effects
Self-fulfilling prophecy
Low expectations → low achievement
Master status
Label becomes main identity (e.g. “troublemaker”)
Learners may:
Accept label
Or reject it and resist authority
Peer labelling
Peers can also label students (e.g. “geek”)
This can:
Pressure learners to stop working hard
Affect identity and achievement
Unequal expectations
Example: Chinese learners (Archer study)
High expectations from teachers
Less support offered because success is assumed
Shows labelling can also disadvantage “successful” groups in different ways
Patterns and explanations for differences in educational achievement and experience based on gender
Gender and educational achievement
Gender differences in education exist in most countries.
Patterns have changed over time:
Historically:
Boys had more access to education
Girls often left early for marriage or domestic roles
Modern societies (e.g. UK):
Girls now often outperform boys at GCSE level
Gender inequality is now studied through questions like:
Why are girls doing better?
Why are boys underachieving?
How have expectations changed over time?
I. Differential gendered socialisation and social control
Gender socialisation
Gender socialisation – learning gender roles and expectations from society
From early childhood:
Girls → expected to become mothers/wives
Boys → expected to become workers/providers
Effects on education (traditional view)
Girls may:
See education as less important
Expect shorter working lives
Boys may:
See education as necessary for future employment
Changing patterns (modern societies)
More women now have career aspirations
Girls are more motivated due to:
Increased job opportunities
Female role models
Education now seen as important for both genders
Economic changes
Decline in manual male jobs (e.g. mining, engineering)
Rise of knowledge-based jobs
ICT, business, finance
Boys may underachieve in some contexts if:
They believe qualifications are not needed for future jobs
Gender and subject choice
Gender socialisation affects subject selection
Boys more likely to choose:
Maths, physics, computing
Careers: engineering, IT, finance
Girls more likely to choose:
Humanities (history, sociology, literature)
Careers: teaching, nursing, caring professions
II. Teacher expectations
Teachers may treat boys and girls differently:
Boys’ poor behaviour seen as “normal”
Girls expected to be well-behaved and hardworking
Gender stereotypes influence expectations:
Boys → dominant, disruptive
Girls → quiet, organised
Some teachers may also:
Have lower expectations of girls’ ability
Or fail to encourage them in some subjects
III. Cultural and social factors
Material and cultural factors
Less relevant than class/ethnicity, but still important in some cases:
Limited family resources may prioritise boys’ education over girls’
Gender differences in achievement
Girls often:
Work more consistently
Spend more time on homework
Are more organised
Perform better in coursework/continuous assessment
Boys often:
Do better in exams requiring short-term revision
Explanations for differences
Girls may:
Mature earlier
Take education more seriously earlier
Boys may:
Be overconfident
Underestimate need for effort
Peer pressure:
Girls → encourage hard work
Boys → discourage effort (linked to masculinity norms)
Some boys (especially working-class):
Avoid effort to maintain masculine identity
Risk joining anti-school subcultures
Subject interest differences
Boys may prefer active/practical learning
Reading is often seen as a female activity
Early socialisation (e.g. mothers reading to children) reinforces this
IV. Access to education
In some countries:
Girls have less access to schooling
Girls leave education earlier
Causes:
Financial constraints
Cultural traditions
(Linked to global inequality in education)
V. In-school factors
Hidden curriculum
Schools send gender messages through organisation:
Separate boys/girls registers
Gender-based seating
Different uniforms
Subject bias
Some subjects seen as gendered:
Science/technology → male-dominated
Dance/domestic subjects → female-dominated
Representation in schools
Textbooks may show:
More male scientists/engineers
Teaching staff:
More female teachers overall
But senior roles often male-dominated
Effect on learners
Girls may feel:
Some subjects are “not for them”
Boys may avoid:
Subjects seen as feminine
Policy changes
Many schools now promote:
Equal opportunities
Gender-neutral career advice
Programs encourage girls into:
STEM subjects
Peer groups and subcultures
Peer groups influence achievement:
Female peer groups → more pro-school, supportive of learning
Male peer groups → more likely to form anti-school subcultures
Masculinity and status
Some boys value:
Peer respect over academic success
Academic achievement may be seen as:
“Uncool” or feminine
Result:
Disruption, underachievement
Changing behaviour (Jackson)
Some working-class girls:
Show “masculine” behaviours (e.g. aggression)
Explanation:
Resistance to pressure to succeed
Self-protection from fear of failure
VI. Labelling theory
Gender labelling in schools
Teachers may label students based on gender:
Girls → neat, polite, hardworking
Boys → disruptive, creative, problematic
Behaviour patterns
Boys:
More likely to be excluded from school
More likely to be labelled as troublemakers
Girls:
Less visible behaviour problems
Effects of labelling
Self-fulfilling prophecy
Labels influence achievement over time
Boys labelled negatively may:
Lose motivation
Engage in disruptive behaviour
VII. Feminist explanations
Feminist perspective
Focus on gender inequality in education and society
Argue education is still influenced by patriarchy
Key concerns
Even though girls now outperform boys, feminists argue girls still face:
Lack of confidence in ability
Male dominance in classrooms
Less teacher attention
Gendered subject choices
Gender bias in teacher expectations
Key idea
Improvements in girls’ achievement do not mean equality has been achieved
Education still shapes unequal life chances for women
Global differences in educational achievement
I. Availability of schools
In many countries, widespread schooling is relatively recent
Example: African countries after independence (1950s–60s)
Few schools existed
Education mainly for colonial elites
Problems in developing school systems:
Lack of money and trained teachers
Few teaching materials
Current issues in some countries
Insufficient number of schools
Long travel distances (especially rural areas)
Very large class sizes (often 50+ learners)
Poor school conditions may include:
No electricity
No clean drinking water
No toilets
Poor ventilation
Lack of books/resources
Lack of science equipment
Few qualified teachers
Unsafe or insecure buildings
II. Poverty and wealth
Poverty and education
Many children:
Do not attend school
Or leave school early
Reasons:
Need to work (farm, family business, household labour)
Education costs still exist (uniforms, books, transport)
Schooling = lost income for families
Health and poverty link
Poor health reduces attendance:
Malaria and other diseases cause frequent absence
Poor living conditions:
No electricity → cannot study at night
Limited study space/resources
Wealth advantages
Wealthy families can:
Pay for private tutoring
Provide extra learning resources
Leads to higher achievement regardless of ability
III. Access to education for girls
Gender inequality in global education
In many developing countries:
Boys more likely to attend school than girls
Reasons:
Sons seen as future breadwinners
Daughters expected to marry and leave family
Families prioritise education of boys when money is limited
School barriers for girls
Lack of facilities:
About 1 in 3 African schools has no toilets
Menstruation issues:
Girls may miss school due to lack of sanitation and privacy
Global efforts
UN promotes education as a human right
Sustainable Development Goal:
Universal literacy and numeracy by 2030
Problem:
~129 million girls worldwide still not in school (UNESCO estimate)
Benefits of educating girls
Improved:
Family health and nutrition
Living standards
Later marriage
Fewer and healthier children
Higher income and employment opportunities
IV. Variations in class sizes
Smaller classes → generally higher achievement
Large classes reduce:
Teacher attention
Individual support
Global differences
Industrialised countries:
Around 25–30 students per class
Developing countries:
Often 70+ students per class (e.g. Malawi, Tanzania)
Effects
Poor start to education (especially in early years)
Overcrowding → less effective learning
V. Norms, values and cultural differences
Schooling is not universally seen as important
Some communities:
Do not value formal education highly
May have parents who had no schooling themselves
Impact on achievement
Low value placed on education → low attendance or motivation
High value placed on education:
Seen as route out of poverty
Leads to higher participation and achievement
VI. Access to internet and digital resources
Digital divide
Schools vary greatly in:
Internet access
Availability of computers
Electricity supply
Benefits of digital access
Access to:
Online learning materials
ICT skill development
Wider educational resources
Disadvantages without access
No electricity or internet → limited learning
Strong inequality during COVID-19:
Some students continued learning online
Others received no education during lockdowns
COVID-19 impact
Highlighted global inequality in education
Created a “Covid Generation” concern
Strengths and limitations of explanations for differences in educational achievement
Key idea
No single explanation fully explains global educational inequality
Factors interact and vary across contexts
Interaction of factors
Social class, ethnicity, and gender overlap:
Working-class groups often overlap with ethnic minorities
Gender differences vary by class:
Working-class girls may underachieve compared to middle-class girls
Key conclusion
Social class is often the strongest factor globally
Poor countries and poor families tend to have lowest achievement
However:
Education systems vary between countries
No universal pattern applies everywhere