Aggregate Expenditure Model & Multiplier Effect (Week 5)
Aggregate Expenditure (AE) Model – Short-Run Overview
- Focus: relationship between total (planned) spending and real GDP in the short run, holding the overall price level constant.
- AE components:
- Consumption (C)
- Planned (intended) Investment (I_P)
- Government Purchases (G)
- Net Exports (NX = X - M)
- Core equilibrium idea:
- Demand side (planned AE) intersects supply side (actual production Y).
- If AE = Y → macroeconomic equilibrium.
- Restaurant example:
- Plans to serve 10 portions (planned investment in inventory).
- Actual customers may differ ⇒ actual investment (change in inventories) diverges from plan.
- Macro link:
- AE > Y → inventories fall → firms raise production → GDP & employment rise.
- AE < Y → inventories rise → firms cut production → GDP & employment fall.
Consumption (C) – Determinants & Function
- Long-run upward trend (real, 2012 dollars) since 1980s.
- Key determinants
- Current Disposable Income (Y_D = Y + TR - T)
- Household Wealth (\text{Wealth}=\text{Assets}-\text{Liabilities})
- Positive relationship with C.
- Expected Future Income
- E.g., students spend based on higher anticipated post-graduation earnings.
- Price Level (CPI)
- Higher prices ↓ real wealth ↓ C; lower prices ↑ real wealth ↑ C.
- Real Interest Rate (r{real}=r{nom}-\pi)
- r_{real} \uparrow → saving ↑, borrowing ↓, C ↓.
- r_{real} \downarrow → saving ↓, borrowing ↑, C ↑.
Consumption Function
- Linear form:
C = \bar C + c\,Y_D
- \bar C = autonomous (necessity) consumption (exists even with zero income).
- c (= MPC, 0<c<1) = marginal propensity to consume.
- Example calculation:
- \Delta C = 39.7 \text{ billion},\; \Delta Y_D = 51.9 \text{ billion}
- MPC = \frac{\Delta C}{\Delta Y_D} = 0.76 ⇒ each extra 1 of income → 0.76 spent, 0.24 saved.
MPC & MPS Relationship (national level)
- Income identity (ignoring NX): Y = C + S + T.
- Changes: \Delta Y = \Delta C + \Delta S + \Delta T.
- For balanced-budget assumption ( \Delta T = 0 ):
1 = MPC + MPS where MPS = \frac{\Delta S}{\Delta Y}. - Table illustration: MPC = 0.6, MPS = 0.4 satisfy identity.
Planned Investment (I_P) – Drivers
- Expected future profitability (optimism ↑ ⇒ I_P ↑).
- Real interest rate (higher cost of borrowing ↓ I_P).
- Corporate taxes (higher taxes ↓ IP; tax cuts ↑ IP — policy link e.g., Trump era).
- Cash flow (internal funds = revenues − expenses; more cash → easier self-finance).
Government Purchases (G)
- Real government spending (2012 dollars) has trended upward.
- Often financed via borrowing (public or foreign savers).
Net Exports (NX)
- NX>0 → exports exceed imports (trade surplus).
- NX<0 → imports exceed exports (trade deficit). Post-2010 Canada shows persistent negatives in example graph.
45-Degree Diagram & Macroeconomic Equilibrium
- Axes:
- Vertical: Real AE.
- Horizontal: Real GDP (Y).
- 45° line: all points where AE=Y.
- AE schedule: AE = C + I_P + G + NX (upward-sloping, intercept = autonomous spending).
- Regions:
- Above 45° → AE>Y → expansionary pressure (inventories ↓, GDP ↑, unemployment ↓).
- Below 45° → AE<Y → recessionary pressure (inventories ↑, GDP ↓, unemployment ↑).
- Intersection → potential GDP (Y^*) with only natural unemployment (structural + frictional).
Multiplier Effect
Concept
- Change in autonomous expenditure (
\Delta A in \bar C,\; \bar I,\; G,\; NX) causes more than proportional change in equilibrium GDP. - Simple multiplier (no taxes/trade):
k = \frac{1}{1-MPC}
Algebraic Derivation
- Aggregate expenditure:
AE = \bar{AE} + cY (where \bar{AE}=\bar C+\bar I+G+NX). - Equilibrium: Y=\bar{AE}+cY \Rightarrow Y = \frac{\bar{AE}}{1-c}.
- Therefore \Delta Y = k \; \Delta \bar{AE}.
Numerical Illustration
- Initial \bar I = 75, \bar C = 30, c=0.8 ⇒ \bar{AE}=105.
Y_1=\frac{105}{0.2}=525. - Increase \bar I by 5 ⇒ \bar{AE}=110 ⇒ Y_2=\frac{110}{0.2}=550.
- Result: \Delta Y = 25 even though \Delta I = 5.
- Multiplier: k= \frac{25}{5}=5 = \frac{1}{1-0.8}.
Intuitive Spending Chain (geometric series)
- First round: firm buys computer 5.
- Second: computer shop spends 0.8\times5 = 4.
- Third: parts maker spends 0.8\times4=3.2.
- Sum: 5[1+0.8+0.8^2+\ldots]=\frac{5}{1-0.8}=25.
Factors Affecting Multiplier
- Higher MPC ⇒ larger k (denominator 1-MPC smaller).
- Leakages (taxes, imports) in reality reduce k below simple model.
Aggregate Demand (AD) Curve & Price Level Link
- Transition from 45° diagram (fixed price) to AD (varying price).
- Axes:
- Vertical: Price Level (P).
- Horizontal: Real GDP (Y).
- AD is downward-sloping because:
- Wealth Effect: P \uparrow → real wealth ↓ → C ↓ → Y ↓.
- International-Trade Effect: P \uparrow → domestic goods relatively dear → exports ↓, imports ↑, NX ↓ → Y ↓.
- Shift mechanism: any rise in autonomous spending (e.g., I_P boost) shifts AE up → higher Y at given P → entire AD curve shifts right.
Comprehensive Numerical Example (with G & NX)
- Given:
- C = 100 + 0.8Y
- I_P = 125
- G = 125
- NX = -30
- Equilibrium:
Y = C + I_P + G + NX = 100+0.8Y +125 +125 -30
0.2Y = 320 \Rightarrow Y = 1600. - Multiplier k = 5 (because MPC=0.8).
- Policy change: \Delta G = +20 ⇒ \Delta Y = k\,\Delta G = 5 \times 20 = 100 ⇒ new Y=1700.
Policy & Real-World Relevance
- Stimulus Packages: Government raises G during recessions; via multiplier, GDP expands more than the initial outlay.
- Corporate Tax Cuts: Intended to boost I_P; can shift AE & AD right but may raise inequality (ethical debate: "tax cuts for the rich").
- Interest-Rate Policy: Central bank lowering r{real} raises both C and IP, amplifying GDP through multiplier.
- Trade Balance Concerns: Persistent NX<0 subtracts from AE; export promotion or import substitution strategies counteract.
- Aggregate Expenditure: AE = C + I_P + G + NX
- Disposable Income: Y_D = Y + TR - T
- Consumption Function: C = \bar C + cY_D
- MPC: MPC = \frac{\Delta C}{\Delta Y_D}
- MPS: MPS = 1 - MPC
- Equilibrium GDP (simple model): Y = \frac{\bar{AE}}{1-MPC}
- Simple Expenditure Multiplier: k = \frac{1}{1-MPC}
- Real Interest Rate: r{real}=r{nom}-\pi
- Net Exports: NX = X - M
Ethical & Practical Implications Discussed
- Government debt financing vs. future tax burden.
- Equity concerns of corporate tax cuts (who benefits?).
- Use of stimulus spending to mitigate cyclical unemployment.
Study Tips & Connections to Previous Material
- Relate price-level effects back to Week-3 CPI discussion (real vs. nominal comparisons).
- Compare individual demand curve vs. economy-wide AD curve (same inverse P-Y relationship but different scale & drivers).
- Understand the difference between autonomous vs. induced (income-dependent) spending—core to multiplier logic.
- Practice drawing 45° diagram → shift AE → map movement to AD graph.