Aggregate Expenditure Model & Multiplier Effect (Week 5)
Aggregate Expenditure (AE) Model – Short-Run Overview
- Focus: relationship between total (planned) spending and real GDP in the short run, holding the overall price level constant.
- AE components:
- Consumption (C)
- Planned (intended) Investment (IP)
- Government Purchases (G)
- Net Exports (NX=X−M)
- Core equilibrium idea:
- Demand side (planned AE) intersects supply side (actual production Y).
- If AE=Y → macroeconomic equilibrium.
- Restaurant example:
- Plans to serve 10 portions (planned investment in inventory).
- Actual customers may differ ⇒ actual investment (change in inventories) diverges from plan.
- Macro link:
- AE > Y → inventories fall → firms raise production → GDP & employment rise.
- AE < Y → inventories rise → firms cut production → GDP & employment fall.
Consumption (C) – Determinants & Function
- Long-run upward trend (real, 2012 dollars) since 1980s.
- Key determinants
- Current Disposable Income (YD=Y+TR−T)
- Household Wealth (Wealth=Assets−Liabilities)
- Positive relationship with C.
- Expected Future Income
- E.g., students spend based on higher anticipated post-graduation earnings.
- Price Level (CPI)
- Higher prices ↓ real wealth ↓ C; lower prices ↑ real wealth ↑ C.
- Real Interest Rate (r<em>real=r</em>nom−π)
- rreal↑ → saving ↑, borrowing ↓, C ↓.
- rreal↓ → saving ↓, borrowing ↑, C ↑.
Consumption Function
- Linear form:
C=Cˉ+cYD
- Cˉ = autonomous (necessity) consumption (exists even with zero income).
- c (= MPC, 0<c<1) = marginal propensity to consume.
- Example calculation:
- ΔC=39.7 billion,ΔYD=51.9 billion
- MPC=ΔYDΔC=0.76 ⇒ each extra 1 of income → 0.76 spent, 0.24 saved.
MPC & MPS Relationship (national level)
- Income identity (ignoring NX): Y=C+S+T.
- Changes: ΔY=ΔC+ΔS+ΔT.
- For balanced-budget assumption ( ΔT=0 ):
1=MPC+MPS where MPS=ΔYΔS. - Table illustration: MPC=0.6, MPS=0.4 satisfy identity.
Planned Investment (IP) – Drivers
- Expected future profitability (optimism ↑ ⇒ IP ↑).
- Real interest rate (higher cost of borrowing ↓ IP).
- Corporate taxes (higher taxes ↓ I<em>P; tax cuts ↑ I</em>P — policy link e.g., Trump era).
- Cash flow (internal funds = revenues − expenses; more cash → easier self-finance).
Government Purchases (G)
- Real government spending (2012 dollars) has trended upward.
- Often financed via borrowing (public or foreign savers).
Net Exports (NX)
- NX>0 → exports exceed imports (trade surplus).
- NX<0 → imports exceed exports (trade deficit). Post-2010 Canada shows persistent negatives in example graph.
45-Degree Diagram & Macroeconomic Equilibrium
- Axes:
- Vertical: Real AE.
- Horizontal: Real GDP (Y).
- 45° line: all points where AE=Y.
- AE schedule: AE=C+IP+G+NX (upward-sloping, intercept = autonomous spending).
- Regions:
- Above 45° → AE>Y → expansionary pressure (inventories ↓, GDP ↑, unemployment ↓).
- Below 45° → AE<Y → recessionary pressure (inventories ↑, GDP ↓, unemployment ↑).
- Intersection → potential GDP (Y∗) with only natural unemployment (structural + frictional).
Multiplier Effect
Concept
- Change in autonomous expenditure (
ΔA in Cˉ,Iˉ,G,NX) causes more than proportional change in equilibrium GDP. - Simple multiplier (no taxes/trade):
k=1−MPC1
Algebraic Derivation
- Aggregate expenditure:
AE=AEˉ+cY (where AEˉ=Cˉ+Iˉ+G+NX). - Equilibrium: Y=AEˉ+cY⇒Y=1−cAEˉ.
- Therefore ΔY=kΔAEˉ.
Numerical Illustration
- Initial Iˉ=75, Cˉ=30, c=0.8 ⇒ AEˉ=105.
Y1=0.2105=525. - Increase Iˉ by 5 ⇒ AEˉ=110 ⇒ Y2=0.2110=550.
- Result: ΔY=25 even though ΔI=5.
- Multiplier: k=525=5=1−0.81.
Intuitive Spending Chain (geometric series)
- First round: firm buys computer 5.
- Second: computer shop spends 0.8×5=4.
- Third: parts maker spends 0.8×4=3.2.
- Sum: 5[1+0.8+0.82+…]=1−0.85=25.
Factors Affecting Multiplier
- Higher MPC ⇒ larger k (denominator 1−MPC smaller).
- Leakages (taxes, imports) in reality reduce k below simple model.
Aggregate Demand (AD) Curve & Price Level Link
- Transition from 45° diagram (fixed price) to AD (varying price).
- Axes:
- Vertical: Price Level (P).
- Horizontal: Real GDP (Y).
- AD is downward-sloping because:
- Wealth Effect: P↑ → real wealth ↓ → C ↓ → Y ↓.
- International-Trade Effect: P↑ → domestic goods relatively dear → exports ↓, imports ↑, NX ↓ → Y ↓.
- Shift mechanism: any rise in autonomous spending (e.g., IP boost) shifts AE up → higher Y at given P → entire AD curve shifts right.
Comprehensive Numerical Example (with G & NX)
- Given:
- C=100+0.8Y
- IP=125
- G=125
- NX=−30
- Equilibrium:
Y=C+IP+G+NX=100+0.8Y+125+125−30
0.2Y=320⇒Y=1600. - Multiplier k=5 (because MPC=0.8).
- Policy change: ΔG=+20 ⇒ ΔY=kΔG=5×20=100 ⇒ new Y=1700.
Policy & Real-World Relevance
- Stimulus Packages: Government raises G during recessions; via multiplier, GDP expands more than the initial outlay.
- Corporate Tax Cuts: Intended to boost IP; can shift AE & AD right but may raise inequality (ethical debate: "tax cuts for the rich").
- Interest-Rate Policy: Central bank lowering r<em>real raises both C and I</em>P, amplifying GDP through multiplier.
- Trade Balance Concerns: Persistent NX<0 subtracts from AE; export promotion or import substitution strategies counteract.
- Aggregate Expenditure: AE=C+IP+G+NX
- Disposable Income: YD=Y+TR−T
- Consumption Function: C=Cˉ+cYD
- MPC: MPC=ΔYDΔC
- MPS: MPS=1−MPC
- Equilibrium GDP (simple model): Y=1−MPCAEˉ
- Simple Expenditure Multiplier: k=1−MPC1
- Real Interest Rate: r<em>real=r</em>nom−π
- Net Exports: NX=X−M
Ethical & Practical Implications Discussed
- Government debt financing vs. future tax burden.
- Equity concerns of corporate tax cuts (who benefits?).
- Use of stimulus spending to mitigate cyclical unemployment.
Study Tips & Connections to Previous Material
- Relate price-level effects back to Week-3 CPI discussion (real vs. nominal comparisons).
- Compare individual demand curve vs. economy-wide AD curve (same inverse P-Y relationship but different scale & drivers).
- Understand the difference between autonomous vs. induced (income-dependent) spending—core to multiplier logic.
- Practice drawing 45° diagram → shift AE → map movement to AD graph.