Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) and Arbitrage Pricing Theory (APT)

Chapter 1: Introduction

  • This chapter discusses capital asset pricing model and arbitrage pricing theory.
  • It builds upon the concepts of risk and return from Chapters 5 and 6.
  • The chapter covers CAPM, APT, and the Fama-French model.

Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM)

  • CAPM is a theoretical description of how the market prices individual securities based on their risk.
  • It considers the risk class of an asset during pricing.
  • CAPM predicts the relationship between an asset's risk and its expected return.
  • It serves two vital functions:
    • Provides a benchmark rate of return for evaluating possible investments.
    • Helps to make an educated guess as to the expected return on an asset that has not yet been traded in the marketplace.
  • CAPM is a centerpiece of modern financial economics.
  • William Sharpe proposed the model and was awarded the 1990 Nobel Prize in Economics.

Price of Risk

  • The price of risk is determined by two factors:
    • Market price of risk.
    • Quantity of risk of asset I.

Chapter 2: Price Of Risk

  • CAPM is an equilibrium model derived using principles of diversification and simplified assumptions about investor behavior and market conditions.
  • Market equilibrium refers to a condition where market prices balance the demand of buyers and the supply of sellers.
  • These prices are called equilibrium prices.
  • CAPM relates the expected required rate of return for any security to its risk, as measured by beta.
  • Total risk is the sum of systematic and unsystematic risk.
  • Unsystematic risk can be diversified away at no cost, so the market will not reward holders of unsystematic risk.

Chapter 3: Market Unsystematic Risk

  • Unsystematic risk is related to the firm and can be diversified.
  • Systematic risk cannot be diversified away without cost.
  • The market compensates for systematic risk with a risk premium.
  • Beta measures systematic risk, which is related to the market.
  • Investors have different risk tolerances and choose securities with different betas.
  • An aggressive investor might choose a portfolio with a beta of 2, while a conservative investor might choose a portfolio with a beta of 0.5.
  • Beta greater than 1 indicates higher risk, while beta less than 1 indicates lower risk.
  • Beta measures the sensitivity of a stock's return to the returns on the market portfolio.
  • Beta = \frac{Covariance(Return{security}, Return{market})}{Variance(Market)}

Chapter 4: Free Return Risk

  • Expected return of a security is calculated as:
    • Expected Return{security} = Risk Free Return + Covariance(Return{security}, Return_{market}) / Variance(Market) * Market Risk Premium
    • Where Market Risk Premium = Expected Return_{market} - Risk Free Return
  • Investors need to be compensated with a risk premium for bearing systematic risk.
  • The market reward to risk ratio is effectively the market risk premium.
  • If the expected rate of return of a security is known, the theoretical price can be derived by discounting the cash flows generated from the security at this expected rate of return.
  • The expected return beta relationship is viewed as a kind of asset pricing model.
  • Assumptions and predictions of the price is based on certain assumptions, some of which are unrealistic.

Chapter 5: Conclusion

  • Assumptions of the CAPM include:
    • All investors have a single period investment horizon.
    • Investors can invest in the universal set of publicly traded financial assets.
    • Investors can borrow or lend at the risk free rate unlimitedly.
    • No taxes or transaction costs.
    • Information is costless and available to all investors.
    • Investors are price takers.
    • All investors have homogenous expectations about the expected values, variance, and correlation of security returns.
    • All investors attempt to construct efficient frontier portfolios and are rational mean variance optimizers.
  • Investors are all very similar except in their initial wealth and their degree of risk aversion.
  • Several assumptions are unrealistic and ignore real world complexities, but they lead to powerful insights into the nature of equilibrium insecurity.