APES Tragedy of the Commons Assignment
The Tragedy of the Commons by Garrett Hardin (1968)
Introduction
The article begins with a quote from J.B. Wiesner and H.F. York regarding national security in a nuclear context.
They argue there is no technical solution to the dilemma of increasing military power and decreasing national security.
Hardin emphasizes that many assume problems have technical solutions, defined as requiring only changes in technological techniques without altering human values or morality.
This article focuses on the concept of "no technical solution problems," with the population problem being a key example.
Definition of No Technical Solution Problems
A technical solution is one requiring only techniques of the natural sciences.
Hardin asserts that many believe finding a solution is possible through technology without recognizing underlying moral or ethical issues.
Game Theory Example
Example: Tic-tac-toe game illustrates a no technical solution problem.
If both players understand the game perfectly, a win is impossible for either player under standard rules.
Alternative definitions of "winning" include cheating or abandoning the game, highlighting abandonment of standard rules.
The Population Problem
The population problem cannot be solved with technical means, akin to tic-tac-toe.
Most discussions focus on technological solutions like farming the seas or developing new wheat strains.
Malthusian Perspective
Refers to Malthus's assertion that population tends to grow geometrically (exponentially).
In a finite world, population growth leads to decreasing per-capita resources, facilitating human misery.
Question of Finite World
Hardin posits that we must treat the world as a finite resource for practical problem-solving.
The conclusion is that in a finite world, population growth must eventually cease.
Achieving Bentham's goal of "the greatest good for the greatest number" is theoretically and biologically impossible.
Mathematical Considerations
von Neumann and Morgenstern state it is not mathematically feasible to maximize multiple variables simultaneously.
Daily caloric intake requirements:
Maintenance calories for survival: Approximately 1600 kilocalories per day.
Additional enjoyment and work require extra calories (work calories).
Implications of Maximizing Population
Maximizing population implies lowering work calories per person to close to zero, effectively minimizing quality of life and goods.
Despite the advent of atomic energy, issues of energy dissipation arise with increasing population.
Optimum vs. Maximum Population
The optimum population must be less than the maximum, with defining "optimum" being a significant challenge requiring generations of analytical work.
What constitutes "good" varies by individual and cannot be universally measured or compared.
A proper criterion of judgment is survival, similar to natural selection processes.
Current Challenges in Population Control
No prosperous population has maintained a growth rate of zero, suggesting a lack of optimal population understanding.
Rapidly growing populations often rank among the most miserable, questioning the assumption that growth signals below-optimum status.
Critique of Adam Smith's Invisible Hand
Hardin challenges Adam Smith’s "invisible hand" theory where individual decisions supposedly benefit society as a whole.
The assumptions of individual optimal choices necessitate revisiting freedoms, possibly curbing them for the greater societal good.
Tragedy of the Commons
The Concept
Introduced by William Forster Lloyd, this concept illustrates that individual gain in shared resources leads to collective ruin.
Example: Open pasture for cattle souls.
Each herdsman aims to maximize herd size:
Positive utility of adding cattle: +1 (individual gain).
Negative utility from overgrazing: -1/n (shared by all herdsmen).
Their rational pursuit results in overgrazing and eventual tragedy.
Historical Understanding
cAwareness of the tragedy has existed since agriculture and property rights began.
Ongoing resource mismanagement reflects inadequate understanding of commons principles.
Examples include overgrazing on federal land and overfishing by maritime nations.
Pollution as a Commons Tragedy
Pollution issues arise not from resource extraction but from waste discharge into communal spaces like air and water.
Rational individuals may find it cheaper to pollute than to treat waste, resulting in collective degradation.
Description of private property limits natural resource use but fails to restrict pollution effectively.
Legislative Challenges
Legislation often lags behind societal need to legislate against pollution, leading to crises as populations grow dense.
Consequences of this oversight lead to a need for redefining property rights related to waste disposal.
The Morality of Acts in Context
System Sensitivity of Morality
The morality of actions fluctuates based on environmental conditions.
Historical examples demonstrate changing ethics regarding resource use over time.
Traditional moral laws need adaptations to address modern complexities.
Need for Administrative Law
The importance of administrative law in regulating behavior highlights systemic complexities.
The moral implications of acts demand nuanced understandings and regulations.
Appeals to conscience are seen as ineffective due to the nature of human behavioral variance.
The Challenge of Freedom to Breed
Hardin identifies that in welfare states, overbreeding poses moral and societal dilemmas.
The mindset promoting the freedom to breed is challenged, as it leads to the trajectory of overpopulation crises.
The United Nations' Universal Declaration of Human Rights is critiqued for perpetuating overpopulation principles:
Each family decides family size without external regulation, despite the implications for shared resources.
Conclusion
The Incompatibility of Conscience and Population Control
Overreliance on conscience for control will lead towards the genetic prevalence of those who ignore these appeals.
Hardin denounces the effectiveness of conscience appeals as long-term population control methods.
Mutual Coercion Agreements
Proposes mutual coercion, agreed upon by affected parties, as a better alternative to address the commons problem creatively.
The prevailing legal framework often creates inequalities in resource management and must evolve.
In summary, freedom must recognize the necessity of certain laws and limitations to prevent ruin, particularly regarding population control.
Final Thoughts
Hardin concludes with a pressing need to abandon the freedom to breed to mitigate the tragedy of the commons.
Emphasizes education as crucial in recognizing the necessity for such changes in societal structure.
vcv