APES Tragedy of the Commons Assignment

The Tragedy of the Commons by Garrett Hardin (1968)

Introduction

  • The article begins with a quote from J.B. Wiesner and H.F. York regarding national security in a nuclear context.

  • They argue there is no technical solution to the dilemma of increasing military power and decreasing national security.

  • Hardin emphasizes that many assume problems have technical solutions, defined as requiring only changes in technological techniques without altering human values or morality.

  • This article focuses on the concept of "no technical solution problems," with the population problem being a key example.

Definition of No Technical Solution Problems

  • A technical solution is one requiring only techniques of the natural sciences.

  • Hardin asserts that many believe finding a solution is possible through technology without recognizing underlying moral or ethical issues.

Game Theory Example
  • Example: Tic-tac-toe game illustrates a no technical solution problem.

    • If both players understand the game perfectly, a win is impossible for either player under standard rules.

    • Alternative definitions of "winning" include cheating or abandoning the game, highlighting abandonment of standard rules.

The Population Problem

  • The population problem cannot be solved with technical means, akin to tic-tac-toe.

  • Most discussions focus on technological solutions like farming the seas or developing new wheat strains.

Malthusian Perspective
  • Refers to Malthus's assertion that population tends to grow geometrically (exponentially).

  • In a finite world, population growth leads to decreasing per-capita resources, facilitating human misery.

Question of Finite World
  • Hardin posits that we must treat the world as a finite resource for practical problem-solving.

    • The conclusion is that in a finite world, population growth must eventually cease.

  • Achieving Bentham's goal of "the greatest good for the greatest number" is theoretically and biologically impossible.

Mathematical Considerations
  • von Neumann and Morgenstern state it is not mathematically feasible to maximize multiple variables simultaneously.

  • Daily caloric intake requirements:

    • Maintenance calories for survival: Approximately 1600 kilocalories per day.

    • Additional enjoyment and work require extra calories (work calories).

Implications of Maximizing Population
  • Maximizing population implies lowering work calories per person to close to zero, effectively minimizing quality of life and goods.

  • Despite the advent of atomic energy, issues of energy dissipation arise with increasing population.

Optimum vs. Maximum Population
  • The optimum population must be less than the maximum, with defining "optimum" being a significant challenge requiring generations of analytical work.

  • What constitutes "good" varies by individual and cannot be universally measured or compared.

  • A proper criterion of judgment is survival, similar to natural selection processes.

Current Challenges in Population Control
  • No prosperous population has maintained a growth rate of zero, suggesting a lack of optimal population understanding.

  • Rapidly growing populations often rank among the most miserable, questioning the assumption that growth signals below-optimum status.

Critique of Adam Smith's Invisible Hand

  • Hardin challenges Adam Smith’s "invisible hand" theory where individual decisions supposedly benefit society as a whole.

    • The assumptions of individual optimal choices necessitate revisiting freedoms, possibly curbing them for the greater societal good.

Tragedy of the Commons

The Concept
  • Introduced by William Forster Lloyd, this concept illustrates that individual gain in shared resources leads to collective ruin.

    • Example: Open pasture for cattle souls.

      • Each herdsman aims to maximize herd size:

      • Positive utility of adding cattle: +1 (individual gain).

      • Negative utility from overgrazing: -1/n (shared by all herdsmen).

      • Their rational pursuit results in overgrazing and eventual tragedy.

Historical Understanding
  • cAwareness of the tragedy has existed since agriculture and property rights began.

  • Ongoing resource mismanagement reflects inadequate understanding of commons principles.

  • Examples include overgrazing on federal land and overfishing by maritime nations.

Pollution as a Commons Tragedy

  • Pollution issues arise not from resource extraction but from waste discharge into communal spaces like air and water.

    • Rational individuals may find it cheaper to pollute than to treat waste, resulting in collective degradation.

  • Description of private property limits natural resource use but fails to restrict pollution effectively.

Legislative Challenges
  • Legislation often lags behind societal need to legislate against pollution, leading to crises as populations grow dense.

  • Consequences of this oversight lead to a need for redefining property rights related to waste disposal.

The Morality of Acts in Context

System Sensitivity of Morality
  • The morality of actions fluctuates based on environmental conditions.

  • Historical examples demonstrate changing ethics regarding resource use over time.

  • Traditional moral laws need adaptations to address modern complexities.

Need for Administrative Law
  • The importance of administrative law in regulating behavior highlights systemic complexities.

  • The moral implications of acts demand nuanced understandings and regulations.

  • Appeals to conscience are seen as ineffective due to the nature of human behavioral variance.

The Challenge of Freedom to Breed

  • Hardin identifies that in welfare states, overbreeding poses moral and societal dilemmas.

    • The mindset promoting the freedom to breed is challenged, as it leads to the trajectory of overpopulation crises.

  • The United Nations' Universal Declaration of Human Rights is critiqued for perpetuating overpopulation principles:

    • Each family decides family size without external regulation, despite the implications for shared resources.

Conclusion

The Incompatibility of Conscience and Population Control
  • Overreliance on conscience for control will lead towards the genetic prevalence of those who ignore these appeals.

  • Hardin denounces the effectiveness of conscience appeals as long-term population control methods.

Mutual Coercion Agreements
  • Proposes mutual coercion, agreed upon by affected parties, as a better alternative to address the commons problem creatively.

  • The prevailing legal framework often creates inequalities in resource management and must evolve.

  • In summary, freedom must recognize the necessity of certain laws and limitations to prevent ruin, particularly regarding population control.

Final Thoughts
  • Hardin concludes with a pressing need to abandon the freedom to breed to mitigate the tragedy of the commons.

  • Emphasizes education as crucial in recognizing the necessity for such changes in societal structure.

vcv