Normal Distribution Practice: Grocery Spending Study Guide
Chapter 6 Problem 19 Overview and Data
This problem is taken from the end-of-chapter 6 problems, specifically number 19 in the textbook. It is a classic normal distribution application involving household grocery spending.
Core Distribution Parameters
- Population Mean ():
- Population Standard Deviation ():
- Distribution Shape: Normal distribution. This is essential because the ability to use a unit normal table to look up proportions depends entirely on the distribution being normal.
Variable Definitions
- Proportion (): This value is always between and (or expressed as a percentage). If a problem asks for probability or proportion, it is asking for .
- Raw Score (): These are real-world units. In this problem, represents dollars (\) spent on groceries.
- -score (): A standardized score typically ranging from to .
The Two-Step Process for Normal Distribution Problems
- Algebra ( to or to ): Using the -score formula: .
- Table/Drawing ( to or to ): Drawing the distribution to determine if the area is a body or a tail and looking up values in the Unit Normal Table.
Part A: Proportion Spending More than per Week
This part asks: What proportion of the population spends more than per week? In probability notation: .
Step 1: Convert Raw Score () to -score
- Formula:
- Calculation:
- The -score is positive . It is exactly , not to be confused with the repeating decimal .
Step 2: Find the Proportion using Drawing and Table
- Drawing: On a number line where is the middle, is placed to the right.
- Direction: The problem asks for "more than," so the shading goes to the right of . This represents a tail.
- Table Lookup: Look up in the column. The tail proportion (Column C) is .
Final Answer for Part A: The proportion is or .
Logical Check: Since the average is , spending is above average. On a normal distribution, of scores are above average. Since is further above the mean, the proportion of people spending even more than that should be less than . is a reasonable result.
Part B: Probability of Spending Less than per Week
This part asks: What is the probability of randomly selecting a family that spends less than per week? In probability notation: .
Step 1: Convert Raw Score () to -score
- Calculation:
- The -score is negative because is less than the mean of . The deviation is .
Step 2: Find the Proportion using Drawing and Table
- Drawing: Place to the left of the center ().
- Direction: The problem asks for "less than," so the shading goes to the left of . This represents a tail.
- Table Lookup: The table only lists positive -score values. Look up the tail proportion for . The value is .
Final Answer for Part B: The probability is or .
Logical Context: Spending less than is significantly lower than the mean of . It is logically harder to spend that little, which aligns with the small probability of .
Part C: Finding the Spending Amount for the Top
This problem asks: How much money do you need to spend on groceries each week to be in the top of the distribution?
Concept Identification
- Given: A proportion () of or .
- Find: The raw score () in dollars.
- Whole Foods Metaphor: The instructor jokes that being in the top of spenders is usually achieved by shopping at Whole Foods, which his wife calls "Whole Paycheck."
Step 1: Table and Drawing to Find
- Drawing: "Top" means shading to the right. Since is less than , it must be a tail.
- Determining Sign: Shading a tail to the right requires a positive -score.
- Table Search: Search the tail column for a value closest to .
- gives a tail of
- gives a tail of
- Both are very close. In this specific class context, either is acceptable. However, the instructor notes that in later chapters, a habit of not "going over" the target value may be useful. Using leads to a -score of .
Step 2: Algebra to Find
- Plug the variables into the -score formula and solve for :
- Multiply both sides by :
- Add the mean:
Final Answer for Part C: To be in the top , a household must spend per week.
Testing and Precision Considerations
Precision Discrepancies
- If you used (as used in the instructor's key), the result would be .
- If you used , the result is .
- Instructor's Stance: The difference of is negligible. For testing purposes (e.g., multiple-choice quizzes), only one correct option will be provided. The other distractors will be significantly different (e.g., vs. ), not just off by cents.
Testing Strategy
- If you are unsure which value to use on a quiz, you can quickly test both -scores in the formula to see which exact match is provided in the options.
- The instructor emphasizes understanding concepts over test-taking mechanics, though he notes that drawing the distribution is the best way to ensure the correct sign (positive or negative) of the -score is used.