Karl popper : how science grows
Popper
many systems have claimed to have true knowledge about the world
Eg religions, politics, tradition, common sense, science
What distinguishes scientific knowledge from o their forms of knowledge?
Why has scientific knowledge been able to grow?
Fallacy of induction
rejects positivism
We should reject verificationism
The fallacy [error] of induction - process of moving rom the observation of particular instances of something to arrive at a general statement or law
Swans example - if observing swans and all are white, we could say that “all swans are white” however, one non white swan will disprove the theory
Falsification
opposite of verificationism
It is capable to be proven wrong by evidence when put to the test
2 features
Principle falsifiable but when tested, it stands up to attempt to disprove it
It is bold - makes big generalisations so is at greater risk of being falsified
Truth
provisional, temporary, capable of refutation at any moment
Criticism and open society
must be open to criticism
Science is a public activity