Family and social structure (post-modernists)
Key ideas
Emerged in the late 20th century
Emphasises choice, diversity and fluidity and the decline of traditional structures
No single dominant narrative- ‘pick and mix’ culture
Society is now more individualistic and less bound by traditional norms
Postmodernists view on family and households
Family diversity-
There is no longer a single dominant family type (Like the nuclear family)
Families come in all forms: Reconstructed, lone parent, same sex
Stacey- Women are the drivers of family change
Choice and personal freedom-
People have more freedom to choose their relationships and family structures
This creates greater instability but also more fulfilment and equality
Traditional roles are less rigid (gender roles in households are changing)
Giddens- ‘The pure relationship’
Relationships are now based on love and sexual attraction rather than duty or tradition
If a relationship isn’t satisfying, people feel free to leave
This has led to rising divorce rates but also more equality
Beck- Risk society and negotiated families
Modern life is full of uncertainty and risk
Families are now negotiated- Roles and expectations are discussed and agreed on rather than fixed by tradition
This increases freedom but also instability
Strengths-
Explains the increase in family diversity and decline of the nuclear family
Highlights how individual choice shapes modern family life
Weaknesses-
Overstates freedom- Choices are still influenced by social class, ethnicity and gender
Chester (Neo-conventional family)- Argue that most people live in nuclear like families even if not
Dosen’t account well for structural inequalities (Poverty, patriarchy)