8. the interactionist approach
Key terms
Interactionist approach — a way to explain development including biological and psychological factors. These factors interact
Diathesis-stress model — an interactionist approach to explaining behaviour. E.g schizophrenia is explained as the result of an underlying vulnerability (diathesis) and a trigger (stressor)
The interactionist approach
acknowledges there are biological, psychological and social factors in the development of schizophrenia
Biological factors = genetic vulnerability, neurochemical and neurological abnormality
Psychological factors = stress
Social factors = poor quality interactions in the family
Diathesis stress model
says that both a vulnerability to schizophrenia and a stress-trigger are necessary to develop the disorder
Meehls model
if a person doesn’t have a schizogene then no amount of stress would lead to schizophrenia
However in carriers of the gene chronic stress through childhood and adolescence, in particular the presence of a schizophrenogenic mother, could result in the development of the disorder
Modern understanding of diathesis
now clean that many genes increase genetic vulnerability, there is no single ‘schizogene’
There are also factors beyond genetic, such as psychological trauma. So this becomes the diathesis rather than the stressor
John Read proposed a neurodevelopmental model in which early trauma alters the developing brain. E.g the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal system may become overactive so they are more vulnerable to later stress, makes people 2-3% more likely to develop schizophrenia
Treatment
compatible with both biological and psychological treatments, such as combining antipsychotic medication and psychological therapies such as CBT
Turkington suggests that its not possible to adopt a purely biological approach and then to simultaneously treat them with psychological therapies such as CBT
Evaluation
Support for vulnerability and triggers
Tienari carried out a large scale study, investigating the impact of both genetic vulnerability and a psychological trigger (dysfunctional parenting)
Followed 19,000 Finnish adopted children whole biological mothers had been diagnosed with schizophrenia, these were compared to a control groups without a family history of schizophrenia
Adoptive parents had been assessed for child-rearing style, found that high criticism, hostility and low levels of empathy were associated with the development of schizophrenia in the high genetic risk group
Diathesis and stress are complex
oversimplified, the original model portrayed diathesis as a single schizogene and stress as schizophrenogenic parenting
However there are multiple factors, both biological and psychological, that affect both diathesis and stress
E.g Houston found that childhood sexual abuse was the diathesis and cannabis use was the trigger/ stress
Real world application
Able to combine biological and psychological treatments
Studies show that combining treatments enhances their effectiveness
Tarrier randomly allocated 315 participants to 3 groups: medication + CBT, medication + counselling, control/ medication only
Participants in group 1+2 showed lower symptoms following the trial
This suggests a clear practical advantage to the interactionist approach
— counterpoint — Jarvis suggests that successful treatment cannot be used to justify a particular explanation. Compared it to saying that because alcohol reduces shyness, shyness if caused by lack of alcohol
Urbanisation
schizophrenia is more commonly diagnosed in urban areas
This can be used to justify the interactionist approach as urban living is more stressful so can act as a trigger
However it may just be that schizophrenia is more likely to be diagnosed in cities, or that people with a diathesis for schizophrenia (e.g teenagers that were abused as children) tend to migrate to cities