Social Psych Ch. 4 Pt 1

Social Perception

  • Definition: Study of how we form impressions of and make inferences about others.
  • Questions addressed:
    • Why are people the way they are?
    • Why do people act as they do?
  • Importance: Understanding behavior helps predict social interactions.

Chapter Overview

  • Main Sections (pp. 121-143 & 148-155):
  1. We rely on (imperfect) memory.
  2. We make causal attributions.
  3. We form impressions of others.

Section 1: Remembering Things Past

  • Short-term vs. Long-term Memory:
  • Short-term memory: Activated information currently in use.
  • Long-term memory: Information from past experiences, may not always be activated.
  • Memory Formation Process:
  1. Encode
  2. Consolidate
  3. Retrieve

Memory as a Reconstructive Process

  • Retrieval influenced by:
  • Biases
  • Schemas
  • Motives
  • Goals
  • Easier to remember information consistent with existing schemas.
  • Highly inconsistent information may require more thorough processing.

Cohen's Experiment (1981)

  • Study on memory influenced by schemas:
  • Participants watched a video of a woman described as liking classical music and beer.
  • They had to identify her as a librarian or waitress; memory affected by schema activation.

Current Schemas Affecting Views on Past Events

  • Mood-congruent memory: People recall memories that match their current mood.
  • E.g., Positive mood aids retrieval of positive memories.

Example Study by McFarland & Ross (1987)

  • Subjects reflected on their feelings for partners two months post-evaluation; responses influenced by current emotional state.

The Misinformation Effect

  • Definition: Post-event cues can implant false memories.

Loftus et al. (1978) Experiment

  • Study on phrasing impact on memory:
  • Participants asked, "How fast was the car going when it hit the other car?" vs. "smash"; associated memories of broken glass impacted by phrasing.

Cognitive Biases Related to Memory

  • Availability Heuristic:
  • Judgments based on immediate examples that come to mind.
  • Faulty conclusions can arise from non-typical examples being more accessible.
  • Kadane & Tversky (1973) Study:
  • Participants estimate word frequency based on patterns (_ _ _ _ING vs. _ _ _ _ N); most guess incorrectly based on immediate retrieval ease, not actual frequency.

Further Examples of Cognitive Accessibility

  • Frequency of words starting with 'r' vs. in third position; examples accessible in memory led to biases.
  • Ease of retrieval demonstrated by Schwarz et al. (1991):
  • Participants recalled assertive behaviors; fewer examples led to higher self-rating of assertiveness due to retrieval ease.