POLI100 Class Lecture 3
Lecture Overview
The lecture covers key historical influences on the founding of liberal democracy, focusing on the Middle Ages, John Locke, and Montesquieu.
The Middle Ages and the Founders' Lessons
The founders of liberal democracy studied the Middle Ages to understand what not to replicate in their own governments.
Key Takeaways from the Middle Ages:
Need for separation of church and state to ensure liberty and rights are protected.
Overcoming feudalism is essential; rigid hierarchies hinder societal freedom.
The idea of hereditary nobility and absolute monarchies should be abandoned; politics should not serve religion.
The Rise of Individualism and the Protestant Reformation
The sixteenth and seventeenth centuries marked a period of increased individualism influenced by:
Protestant Reformation (1517): Initiated by Martin Luther's 95 theses; promoted individual relationships with God, reducing reliance on clergy.
Enabled individuals to read and interpret the Bible, fostering a sense of independence and personal faith.
The Enlightenment
The Enlightenment, dubbed the Age of Reason, prioritized science and reason over tradition and religious dogma.
Encouraged societies to seek progress and improve living conditions rather than focusing solely on the afterlife.
John Locke's Influence on the Founders
John Locke (English philosopher) profoundly impacted the United States' founding principles.
Natural Rights: Locke articulated that humans possess natural rights to life, liberty, and property.
These ideas are evident in the Declaration of Independence and the founding documents of the U.S.
Example of Locke's influence:
The phrase "pursuit of happiness" in the Declaration was at least partly derived from Locke's emphasis on property rights.
It was argued that using "happiness" was intended to include a broader segment of society beyond just property owners.
Natural Law vs. Positive Law
Natural Law: Universal moral principles that govern all people, discoverable by reason and ordained by God.
Examples of natural laws:
No one should harm another's life, liberty, or possessions.
Positive Law: Human-made laws, which must adhere to natural law.
If positive laws contradict natural laws, they are considered illegitimate.
People have the right to revolt against illegitimate laws.
State of Nature and the Need for Government
Locke's view of the State of Nature:
A pre-governmental society governed by natural law, where people had rights, including property.
A problem arises due to a lack of impartial judges for disputes:
Example: Joe and Emerson with Granny Smith apples illustrates potential conflicts and natural rights violations.
Disputes lead to a State of War, requiring government for conflict resolution.
Consent to be Governed
Locke emphasized that political authority derives from consent of the governed.
Citizens consent to relinquish some rights (such as judging disputes, punishing transgressors) in exchange for protection of their natural rights.
This consent serves as a cornerstone of political legitimacy.
Montesquieu's Contributions
Montesquieu (French political philosopher) introduced the concept of the Separation of Powers:
Unlike previous thinkers, he connected separation of powers to individual liberty.
Liberty is defined as an individual's perception of safety and the absence of arbitrary power.
Without clear separation between legislative, executive, and judiciary powers, arbitrary governance threatens liberty.
Classical Liberalism vs. Classical Republicanism
Classical Liberalism:
Characterized by a limited scope of government that primarily protects individual rights (life, liberty, property).
Associated with thinkers like Locke, Hobbes, Adam Smith.
Classical Republicanism:
Advocates for government responsibility in promoting the common good.
Examples include prohibiting harmful behaviors, like gambling or substance abuse, for the welfare of society.
Suggests that government should not only protect natural rights but also take an active role in improving societal welfare.
Discussion and Questions
Students engage in a discussion regarding consent to be governed and the implications of their civic duties.
Questions raised:
Do we consent to be governed?
What constitutes genuine consent?
Is government only responsible for protecting rights, or should it also promote societal welfare?
Conclusion
Locke's philosophy significantly shaped the Founders' perspectives on governance, liberty, rights, and the role of government.
Poli lecture 3