Chapter 18
Chapter 18: Oligopoly
Definition of Oligopoly
Oligopoly: A market structure where a few sellers offer similar or identical products.
Strategic Behaviour: Decisions made by a business regarding price (P) or quantity (Q) that can influence the reactions of other businesses.
Game Theory: The study of strategic decision-making among individuals or businesses.
Example: Cell Phone Duopoly in Smalltown
Population: 140 residents of Smalltown.
Good Provided: Cell phone service with unlimited minutes and free phones.
Demand Schedule: Illustrates consumer demand in relation to price.
Businesses Involved: Telus and Rogers (a duopoly, which is a specific type of oligopoly).
Cost Structure:
Fixed Costs (FC): $0
Marginal Cost (MC): $10
Competitive vs. Monopoly Outcomes
Competitive Outcome:
Price (P) = MC = $10
Quantity (Q) = 120
Profit = $0
Monopoly Outcome:
Price (P) = $40
Quantity (Q) = 60
Profit = $1,800
Collusion in Oligopoly
Collusion: An agreement among businesses about production quantities or prices.
Example Outcome:
Colluding to produce half the monopoly output:
Each produces Q = 30, P = $40
Profits = $900 each
Cartel: A group of firms that collude to act together.
Incentives Against Collusion
If one business (Telus) breaks the agreement and increases production:
Market quantity = 70, Price (P) = $35
Telus's profit = $1,000
As a result, each firm has an incentive to renege on collusion, typically leading to both firms losing cooperation.
Cooperation vs. Self-Interest in Oligopoly
Tension: Cooperation (collusion) versus self-interest.
Oligopolists would benefit more from sticking to agreements but are incentivized to act in their self-interest, leading to difficulty in maintaining cartels and limiting monopoly-like behavior.
Nash Equilibrium in Oligopoly
Nash Equilibrium: Where each participant's best strategy depends on the actions of others.
In the duopoly example, both firms producing Q = 40 is a Nash equilibrium since both firms' optimal strategy depends on the other producing the same.
Comparison of Oligopoly Market Outcomes
Production: Oligopoly Q is greater than monopoly Q but less than competitive Q.
Price: Oligopoly P is higher than competitive P but lower than monopoly P.
Output and Price Effects in Oligopoly
Output Effect: If P > MC, increasing output raises profits.
Price Effect: Increasing market quantity can lower market price, which reduces profit on all units sold.
Businesses continue to produce based on the comparison of output effect and price effect.
The Size and Nature of Oligopoly
Increasing the number of firms:
Price effects become smaller, leading to competitive market characteristics
Price approaches marginal cost
Market quantity approaches socially efficient levels.
Role of Game Theory in Oligopoly
Game Theory: Analyzes strategic interactions between firms.
Dominant Strategy: Preferred strategy regardless of the opponent's action.
Prisoners’ Dilemma: A scenario demonstrating that cooperation can be challenging even when mutually beneficial.
Prisoners' Dilemma Example
Bonnie and Clyde: Caught with limited evidence, offered a deal to confess.
Outcomes based on choices (Confess or remain silent). Each ends up with prison terms conflicting with a potential better outcome.
Dominant Strategy: For both Bonnie and Clyde to confess.
Application of Prisoners’ Dilemma in Oligopolies
Oligopolists face a similar dilemma when forming cartels. The mutual best outcome (monopoly profits) undermined by self-interest leads them to produce more than agreed, reducing overall profits.
Other Prisoners' Dilemma Examples
Advertising Wars: Companies spend on ads that cancel out effects, resulting in lower profits.
OPEC: Member countries attempt to cooperate, but self-interest often leads to individual renunciation.
Arms Race: Countries benefit from cooperation (disarm), but each acts in self-interest to arm themselves.
Prisoners’ Dilemma and Social Welfare
Non-cooperative Equilibrium: Ensures lower profits for businesses but aligns closer with social efficiency regarding output and pricing.
Challenges of Cooperation: In multiple scenarios, inability to cooperate can lead to social welfare declines.
Application: Covid-19 Toilet Paper Shortage
Consumer behavior during shortages leads to irrational racing to stores, similar to competitive environments.
Nash Equilibrium results in consumers racing to stock up on TP, potentially leading to shortages.
Why Cooperation May Occur
In repeated game scenarios:
Strategies such as “Tit-for-Tat” promote cooperation.
Public Policy Related to Oligopolies
Governments can improve market outcomes by promoting competition and preventing collusion.
Antitrust Laws: Regulations aim to stabilize market dynamics by disallowing practices that restrict trade.
Conclusion
Oligopolies can behave like monopolies or competitive markets, based on their inter-business relationships and number of competitors.
The prisoners' dilemma exemplifies challenges in cooperation within oligopolies, leading to regulatory responses for maintain market efficiency.