GOV Module 6
OVERVIEW QUESTIONS
What role does the Constitution designate for Congress in foreign policy?
What is the War Powers Act?
How does Congress shape foreign policy?
What is partisanship? How does partisanship affect congressional action on foreign policy? Describe some examples of congressional oversight over foreign policy.
What is divided government? How does it influence foreign policy?
How does Congress shape public opinion over foreign policy?
Identify the principal components of the Weissman argument about the role of Congress in shaping the use of military force. What examples does he cite as illustrating Congressional failure to uphold its constitutional responsibility with respect to the use of military force?
According to the McKeon and Tess reading, how might Congress reassert its role in foreign policy?
Intro
how congress influence american political system
exec and legislative branch have significant power over foreign policy
manifest in questions over how each branch of gov excercises its constitutional powers
congress has grown unwillingness in role for foreign policy
8 lecture segments
constitutional power over congres
war powers act (war powers resolution)
passed in 1973 over the veto of pres nixon
attempted to reestablish greater congressional involvement over foregin policy after serious expansion of presiential foreign policy
concept of institutions
rules of gov for politics
enormouse consequences for political outcomes
how partisanship introduces divided gov
presidents power doesnt hold majority in house or senate
how divided governemtn affects foreign policy
two assigned readings
weissman
McKeon and Tess
VIDEO 1
Congress and Partisanship in Foreign Policy
examine constitutional powers over foregin policyt posessed by congress
pres power has expanded over past few decades
DOESNT mean congress pays NO ROLE
congress still has important roles granted by constitution
CONGRESSIONAL POWERS OVER USE OF MILITARY FORCE
direct constitutional powers over
powers to make war(CONGRES ALONE)
finalize peace treaties
provisions citing this
article 1 section 8 (declare war)
establishing (funding)armed forces
senate has power to block pres. treaty if over 1/3 of senate objects
SUMMARY
Congress and declaration of war
congress and the power of the purse
senate and treaty veto
-
WW2 changed everything
USA rose to global superpower
numerous military interventions WITHOUT FORMAL DECLARATION OF WAR
vitenman
iraq
still doesnt mean congress doesnt play important role
congress can still have provision with senate blockign presidents treaty (over 1/3 must agree to BLOCK)
congressional check on pres. treaty negotiations
limits ability of US to use multilateral efforts (climate change, weapons, etc)
blanket rejectionism
keeps USA out of all sorts of intl agreements
WORKAROUNDS
pres loophole around supermajority senate required to ratify thier treaties
use exec power
pres can still make admin decisions that follow all mandates of the unratified treaty
EXAMPLE: senate refueses comprehensive test ban treaty
signatory states can test nuclear weapons
treaty was passed in UN 1996
US refused to join bc senate refused reratification in 1999
US Is not formally part of treaty
some presidents like George HW bush, Clinton, GEORGE W bush, obama, and biden, and trump all follow basic mandate of treaty
BUT trump has reopened possiblity of resuming nuclear tests
Non-binding agreemnts
intl agreement short of a treaty that doesnt need senate approval
gets around congress leverage of check on pres foreign policy power
BUT climate change issues and other long term issues need permanent long standing treaties to be impcactful
EXAMPLE: Paris Climate Accords
US keeps getting in and out
obama used exec orders to enter
trump withdrawed
biden reentered
trump withdrawed again
policy instability = downside of presidents’ political inability to gain 2/3 supermajority in senate to ratify official treaty battling climate change
VIDEO 2
War Powers Act
aka War Powers Resolution
US hasnt declared war since WW2
1973 congressional attempt to rein in presidential war-making power after the Vietnam war
passed over pres nixon’s veto
viewed by every pres since nixon as unconstiutional bc it violates separation of powers
argues that by interjecting congress into debates, rebalanced powers of pres and congress against what founding fathers intended
Necessary and proper clause
congress NOT PRES haspower to make necessary and proper laws vested by the constitution
gives congress broad powers over foreign policy
requires pres to notify congress within 48 hrs when pres dispatches military forces into armed hostilities
EXAMPLE: trump used strikes against drug boats sept 2, 2025
trump notified congress on sept 4th
watned to protect US and interests abroad
pres must get official authorization from congress (AUMF) for over 60 days military use
authorization for use of military force
to use military force for longer than 60 days
pres use old AUMFs to justify long after theyve been passed
EXAMPLE:
obama attacks islamic state(ISIS) in syria
used previous AUMF in 2001 after 9/11
but ISIS(syrian group) was diff from al qaeda (9/11 group)
VIDEO 3
practical politics of congressional oversight
decisions to go to war can impact politicains in future
ppl didint like hillary bc she wanted to go to war in iraq
obama opposed at time
VIDEO 4
Partisanship and Congress
congress can shape foreign policty
congress can check president (constitutional oversight)
can limit or embolden pres
divided gov based on partisanship?
congress checks more when divided government is present - dem president & republican majority in senate, etc
unified gov - single political party controls all three branches of exec, legislative, etc
UNDER BUSH
more expansion of military force (iraq war)
UNDER TRUMP
more isolationism
VIDEO 5
Divided Gov, congress, and foreign policy
DIVIDED GOVS
obama
UNIFIED GOV
trump rn
obama’s congress had criticized him
biden’s congress criticized his spending in ukraine
intelligence and info given to pres for better judgement
party opposing pres. will try to offset info advantage
pres is less likley to use military force as opposing party goes up
use of military force is still constrained by ocngress when div gov exists
VIDEO 6
bully pulpit used by congress can influence political opinion of president
hearings create public congress opportunity to voice displeasure
bipartisan support presence decreases news criticism
bipartisan support absence increases criticism
congress can shape public opinion abt foreing policy
EXMPALE: OBAMA WANTING TO GO TO SYRIA
challenged that US doesnt only rely on air power
there wasnt an arab country in the region capable to defeat isis
EXAPMLE TRUME
stornger restircions on immigration = bad
Trump saying NATO allies in europe not paying their share criticised
VIDEO 7
Discussion of weissman reading
broad critique of congressional inacctivity in foreign policy
argues that congress has abandoned active participation
attributes this to 9/11
note that congress hasnt always been paralized by gridlock (vietnam war)
congress failed to participate actively in decisoins to use military force in libya and syria
US and allies went beyond UN mandate
regime change
toppled libyas leader
provided ISIS group opportunith to expand
congress shoudlve challenege motivations/interests of white house
Sirya, congress was a bystander
congress unwiling ot pay political costs of pusihng obama to a more forceful military invasion
lengthened civil war
strengthened ISIS
congress abandonment of central constiutional role over foreign policy
CONGRESS CAN REASSERT BY
aggressive indpt policy assesments
challenge deception from execs
party leaders need to build stronger foreign policy coalitions within congress to speak with a collective voice
VIDEO 8
Discussion of McKeon
former dem foreign policy staffers written this
published in 2019
dems gained majority in HOR
tries to chart out dem congress navigating div gov
broader trend that congress continues to cede more responsiblity to execs
congress should reassert itself in trade policy
congress has to play larger role in military force (replace 2001 AUMF)
congress pass legislation of diplomacy (can draw thing that pres cant withdraw from NATO
draw public opinion to issues
buget authorization process pas bills to control exploitation of exec admin