FRA Packet 4

Troubled Debt Restructuring

Definition

  • Creditor concessions: This occurs when a creditor grants a concession to a debtor.

  • Trouble: A borrower is described as troubled when they are unable to pay the original loan.

Types of Troubled Debt Restructuring

  1. Settlement

    • Cancels the original loan through payment of consideration, which can be in cash or other assets.

    • The fair value (FV) of the consideration must be less than the original loan amount.

    • Borrower's Accounting:

      • Recognizes gain due to debt restructuring (this is a writedown of debt) and may also recognize gain or loss on asset transfer.

    • Lender's Accounting:

      • Recognizes a loss on debt restructuring calculated as (original NBV - new NBV).

  2. Continuation with Moderation of Terms

    • An alternative to a direct settlement where modifications are made to the existing loan terms.

    • This may include lowering interest rates and/or extending payment terms (i.e., creating a new loan agreement).

    • Borrower's Accounting:

      • May or may not recognize gain on debt restructuring and possibly gain or loss on asset transfer.

    • Lender's Accounting:

      • Recognizes loss on debt restructuring calculated as (original NBV - new NBV).

  • Combination: Both settlement and continuation with moderation can occur simultaneously.

Accounting Entries for Settlement

  • Lender:

    • DR: Consideration received (FMV)

    • DR: Loss on restructuring (plug)

    • CR: Note Receivable (NBV)

  • Borrower:

    • DR: Note Payable (NBV, same as above)

    • CR: Consideration paid (FMV, same as above)

    • CR: Gain on restructuring (plug, same as above)

  • Note: The lender's loss is equal to the borrower's gain in a settlement scenario.

Settlement Example

  • A case example involves an 8% zero coupon note with par value of $1M, 3 years to maturity, settled in exchange for an asset:

    • Asset's NBV = $500K

    • Asset's FMV = $650K

    • Pre-restructuring Debt NBV:
      ext{Debt NBV} = rac{1M}{(1.08)^3} = 793,832

    • Lender's Entries:

    • DR: Asset $650,000

    • CR: Note Receivable $793,832

    • Loss: $143,832 (793,832 - 650,000)

    • Borrower's Entries:

    • DR: Note Payable $793,832

    • CR: Asset $650,000

    • Gain: $143,832 (793,832 - 650,000)

    • Note about borrower’s implicit intermediate entry (not detailed in the original example):

    • DR: Asset $150,000

Continuation with Moderation of Terms

  • Two cases to consider:

    1. Case 1: Undiscounted sum of new cash flows (CFs) is greater than the lender’s discounted NBV of the loan.

    2. Case 2: Undiscounted sum of new CFs is less than the lender’s discounted NBV of the loan.

Case 1: Undiscounted CFs > Discounted NBV
  • No restructuring gain for the borrower (no writedown of debt).

  • The borrower must recompute the new interest rate such that the lender’s NBV equals the discounted sum of CFs, using this to calculate future interest expense.

  • This results in a new interest rate that is lower than the original rate (due to lower CFs), while the lender continues with the original (higher) rate.

  • The new (lower) NBV is derived from new (lower) CFs discounted at the original rate.

  • The lender recognizes a restructuring loss, calculated as follows:
    ext{Loss} = ext{original NBV} - ext{new NBV}

  • Note: The lender's interest income will be greater than the borrower's interest expense due to the differing rates.

Case 1 Entry Structure at Point of Restructuring
  • Borrower: No journal entry required; adjustment is made to compute interest expense using the new (lower) rate and amortize the loan accordingly.

  • Lender: Writes down the loan to the new NPV; loss calculated as follows:

    • DR: Loss on restructuring (Change in NPV)

    • CR: Note Receivable (Change in NPV)

Case 1 Example
  • The same note from slide 5 is used with pre-restructuring NBV of $793,832.

  • Assume modification requires the borrower to repay $867,442 at maturity.

  • The implicit interest rate is determined as follows:
    867,442/(1.03)^3 = 793,832

  • Lender’s new NBV calculation:
    ext{New NBV} = 867,442/(1.08)^3 = 688,603

  • The lender's loss is then calculated as:
    ext{Loss} = 793,832 - 688,603 = 105,229

  • Borrower's Entries:

    • DR: Interest Expense $23,815 (calculated as $793,832 * 0.03)

    • CR: Note/Payable $23,815

  • Lender's Entries:

    • DR: Restructuring Loss $105,229

    • CR: Note Receivable $105,229

    • DR: Note Receivable $55,088

    • CR: Interest Revenue $55,088

    • Interest revenue example: 688,603 * 0.08 = 55,088

Case 2: Undiscounted CFs < Discounted NBV
  • The borrower recognizes a gain on debt restructuring (writedown of debt).

  • Gain is calculated as:
    ext{Gain} = ext{Previous NBV} - ext{Undiscounted sum of new CFs}

  • The borrower continues with a zero interest rate, resulting in zero future interest expense, and all future cash payments are treated as a return of principal, which involves a debit (DR) to the liability.

  • Borrower's Entries:

    • DR: Note Payable (Change in NPV)

    • CR: Gain (Change in NPV)

  • Lender will follow a similar procedure as outlined in the previous case.

Case 2 Example
  • Using the same values as Case 1, with the borrower requiring a repayment of $700,000 at maturity.

  • Borrower’s Entries:

    • DR: Note/Payable $93,832

    • CR: Gain $93,832 (this is calculated as $793,832 - $700,000)

  • When the loan is repaid, entries include:

    • DR: Note/Payable $700,000

    • CR: Cash $700,000

    • Note: There is zero interest expense recorded.

  • For the lender:

    • The values lead to calculations, as shown:

      1. 700,000/(1.08)^3 = 555,683

      2. Gain calculation, 793,832 - 555,683 = 238,149

      3. Thus, the lender’s loss:

        • DR: Loss $238,149

        • CR: Note/Receivable $238,149

  • The lender’s interest revenue calculation:

    • DR: Note Receivable $44,455

    • CR: Interest Revenue $44,455

    • Interest revenue = 555,683 * 0.08

Summary and Key Issues

  • There is a notable difference in accounting between the borrower and lender due to the nature of their transactions.

  • Different loan values may result in differing interest rates leading to distinct gains and losses for each party.

  • Recognized gains and losses do not equate to economic gains and losses.

  • The borrower's true new interest rate could exceed the original rate; however, GAAP may assign a lower rate (possibly zero in Case 2) for practical consideration since accurately determining the true rate is complex.