City Community - 2010 - Shlay - Making Place The Shifting Green Line and the Development of Greater Metropolitan (1)
Introduction to Making Place in Jerusalem
This paper discusses the complexities surrounding place-making in Jerusalem, highlighting how territorial dynamics have evolved post the 1948 Arab-Israeli War. Specifically, it elaborates on the Green Line, which represents the ceasefire boundaries established after this conflict.
Definition and Consequences of the Green Line
The Green Line originated in 1949 as a demarcation of Israel's borders, although it changed following the 1967 Six-Day War when Israel annexed territories.
The paper argues the shifting perceptions of the Green Line have led to the instability of Jerusalem's identity and exacerbate the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
Frontier Cities and Social-Spatial Divisions
Jerusalem exemplifies a frontier city characterized by spatial separation and socio-political contests between different ethnic groups (Jews and Palestinians).
Place-making here is a dynamic process intertwined with power relations, where both sides contest rightful claims to territory.
Historical Context and Boundary Changes
Pre-1948 Period:
Under Ottoman rule (16th century–1917), religious groups lived in segregated neighborhoods.
The British mandate continued this trend until the UN proposed partition in 1947.
1948-1967:
Post-war division created disconnected capital cities under Jordanian and Israeli control.
The armistice line became known as the Green Line after 1949.
Post-1967 Developments:
Israel's capture of territories and subsequent urban expansion fostered a new metropolitan landscape, shifting perceptions of the Green Line.
Israeli policies intended to unify Jerusalem have altered its demographic and geographical boundaries, highlighting a shift in power dynamics.
The Role of Violence and Resistance
Acts of violence such as the intifadas and military responses significantly influenced planning and governance in Jerusalem.
The geographical division created by the wall/fence, constructed post-2000, further complicates everyday life and assists in the physical fragmentation of the city.
Political Implications
The development of neighborhoods and boundary expansions have broader geopolitical implications, including international responses and the ongoing struggle for Palestinian statehood.
Different narratives persist, with Israelis largely seeing development as legitimate while Palestinians uniformly view it as expansionist and a means of dispossessing their claims.
Conclusion: A Divided City
The shifting Green Line encapsulates the essence of power and territorial conflict within Jerusalem, creating an uncertain future for both communities.
Efforts from both sides to claim and legitimize their boundaries continue to drive the complex narrative surrounding Jerusalem, which remains a focal point of tension between Israel and Palestine.