Lecture 11 – Gentrification, Regent Park & Waterfront Toronto Study Notes

Readings Newly Assigned for the Final Exam

  • Six readings in total are examinable: three from earlier “Water” lectures + three new, shorter readings introduced in Lecture 11.
  • All new readings revolve around gentrification, city-re-formation and the creative-city paradigm.

Reading 1 — “Geographies of Displacement in the Creative City: Liberty Village” (Katungol, Leslie & He, 2009)

  • Case-study zone: Liberty Village, Toronto (north of Gardiner Expwy., bounded by Dufferin St., Strachan Ave., King St. W. & Douro St.).
  • Historic land-use: former heavy-industrial district ➔ deindustrialisation ➔ abandoned, polluted, “grey” landscape (oil spills, toxic soils, broken glass).
  • Today: mixed-use residential, patios, restaurants, creative/tech offices; marketed as a “creative district.”
  • Core concepts developed in the article:
    • Gentrification & Displacement: transformation attracts middle-class residents & tourists but displaces low-income industrial workers/artists.
    • Creative City Thesis: cities re-brand former industrial lands to compete for tourists, talent & investment.
    • Place-making scales analysed: \text{city} \rightarrow \text{neighbourhood} \rightarrow \text{precinct}.
    • Political economy: municipal drive for \text{economic development} + private real-estate capital + cultural branding.
  • Significance for exam: understand mechanisms, winners/losers, and Liberty Village’s role as Toronto’s archetype of “positive deformation.”

Reading 2 — “Shaping the Old City” (Ralph, Chapter 3, pp.27!–!43, 2014)

  • Provides historical context for Toronto’s inner-city evolution prior to major amalgamation.
  • Themes: post-war planning ideologies, rise of urban renewal, and the political actors who pushed redevelopment.
  • Note: several pages were not scanned; only study the pages provided (confirmed by instructor).

Reading 3 — “The Ascendancy of Metropolitan Toronto” (Ralph, Chapter 4, pp.44!–!58)

  • Continuation of Reading 2; shifts focus to metropolitan governance structures.
  • Highlights creation of Metro Toronto, fiscal tools for infrastructure, and early debates on suburban integration.

Video Case Study 1 — “Oak Street / Regent Park” (National Film Board, 15 – 16 minutes)

  • Documents Oak Street (east-downtown) before & after transformation into Regent Park, Canada’s first large-scale public-housing project.
  • Pre-redevelopment conditions: overcrowding, one bathroom for 6 families, vermin, sub-standard housing.
  • Redevelopment goals: clear slums, build 1\,300 modern units, create green space & dignity for low-income families.
  • Exam cues:
    • Visual contrasts (before/after streetscape).
    • Public-housing model vs. later mixed-income approaches.
    • Ethical questions: state-led displacement, paternalism, and long-term socio-economic outcomes.

Video Case Study 2 — “Toronto Booms” (NFB, early 1950\text{s})

  • Snapshot of post-war optimism: factories, branch plants, stock exchange bustle, Canada’s first subway (opened 1954).
  • Shows waterfront as undeveloped mudflats (no CN Tower, no high-rises) ➔ useful baseline for comparing Waterfront Toronto today.
  • Traffic congestion already flagged by Mayor MacCallum—illustrates perennial urban-mobility tensions.

Waterfront Toronto Megaproject (est. 2001)

  • Public-agency partnership: Federal Govt. + Ontario Govt. + City of Toronto.
  • Mandate: transform former industrial waterfront into a sustainable district for living, working, learning & recreation.
  • 59 individual projects; mix of completed, on-going, planned.

Foundational Objectives

  • Flood protection & climate resilience.
  • Economic stimulus & job creation.
  • Social inclusion (affordable housing, public realm, AODA compliance).
  • Environmental remediation & biodiversity enhancement.

West Don Lands (WDL)

  • Site: 32\,ha west of Don River.
  • Deliverables:
    • 5\,500 residential units (rent-geared-to-income + market).
    • 25\,ha Corktown Common park (also engineered berm for flood defense).
    • 11\,km storm-water sewers + 18\,km sanitary sewers feeding Cherry St. UV-disinfection plant.
    • Cooper Koo Family YMCA: social hub (job-search workshops, recreation).
  • Award: ULI Global Award for Excellence 2017.

Flood-Protection & Infrastructure Numbers

  • Portland’s Flood Protection budget: 1.25\text{ billion CAD} (tri-government funding, 2017).
  • Projected completion: early 2024 (COVID-delayed).
  • Economic ripple: 10\text{ billion} private investment leveraged; 4.1\text{ billion} return to public coffers.

East Bayfront (EBF)

  • 23\,ha precinct east of Bay St.
  • Anchor institutions: George Brown College – Waterfront Campus, high-speed fibre hub.
  • Landscapes: Sugar Beach (urban sand beach; no direct lake entry) & Boardwalk Promenade.
  • Ongoing high-rise construction (cranes visible).

Connectivity Projects

  • Queens Quay Revitalization: granite sidewalks, tree-lined boulevard, bike track, LRT right of way.
  • Martin Goodman Trail: continuous waterfront cycling/jogging route.
  • Ferry & Water-Taxi Expansion:
    • Existing docks: Jack Layton Terminal ➔ Ward’s, Centre, Hanlan’s Islands + Billy Bishop link.
    • Planned new docks (orange in map) to decentralise island access.
  • Bentway (under Gardiner Expwy.): future 11\,km linear park (skating, art, food, libraries).

Green Building & Ecology

  • Mandatory Minimum Green Building Requirements (LEED Gold or equivalent; low-carbon systems; rain-water harvesting).
  • Soil-Cell Technology: structural underground cages protecting roots ➔ 17\,000 trees planted; healthy canopy goals \ge 30\% coverage.
  • 95\% native‐species planting; 118\,000\,m^2 of new aquatic habitat.

Social & Ethical Dimensions

  • Balances place-making for tourists/creative class with commitments to affordability & accessibility (AODA).
  • Potential displacement risks parallel Liberty Village & Regent Park histories—critical lens required.

Overarching Concepts & Theoretical Connections

  • Creative-City Narrative (Florida et al.): culture & design as economic engines; contested by critics for fuelling inequality.
  • Gentrification Cycle: industrial decline ➔ artist/pioneer in-migration ➔ capital reinvestment ➔ displacement.
  • Public–Private Partnerships (P3s): Waterfront Toronto as exemplar; question of democratic accountability vs. delivery efficiency.
  • Climate-Urbanism: flood berms, storm sewers, wetlands turned into leisure amenities—“resilience sells.”
  • Place-Making: physical design + narrative branding; success judged by social mix & long-term sustainability.

Practical Exam-Preparation Tips

  • Read ALL pages provided even if scans have blank pages; blanks will not be examined.
  • Re-watch both NFB videos + TVO “Waterfront” documentary (≈ 52 min) multiple times; instructor will design direct video-based questions.
  • Memorise key statistics (areas, costs, units) & be ready to perform quick comparisons or calculations, e.g.
    • \frac{10\text{ billion}}{1.25\text{ billion}} \approx 8-fold private leverage.
  • Be able to locate Liberty Village, Regent Park, West Don Lands, East Bayfront & Corktown Common on a sketch map.
  • Prepare short-answer reflections on ethical trade-offs: Who benefits? Who is displaced? How is “public good” measured?

Big-Picture Takeaways

  • Toronto’s contemporary urban identity is inseparable from cycles of industrial decline ➔ creative re-branding ➔ displacement & renewal.
  • Waterfront Toronto showcases integrated planning: \text{environmental} + \text{economic} + \text{social} pillars executed via multilevel governance.
  • Historical films reveal continuity of issues (housing shortages, traffic, identity debates) despite radical physical change.
  • Understanding these layers equips you to critique future mega-projects and to answer final-exam questions with depth & nuance.